Parents Divided on CBD Product Safety for Children

A survey of U.S. parents found widespread uncertainty about CBD product safety for children, with many unaware of poison control risks.

McNally, Michael et al.·Frontiers in public health·2025·Preliminary EvidenceCross-Sectional
RTHC-07105Cross SectionalPreliminary Evidence2025RETHINKTHC RESEARCH DATABASErethinkthc.com/research

Quick Facts

Study Type
Cross-Sectional
Evidence
Preliminary Evidence
Sample
Not reported

What This Study Found

While most parents and caregivers had heard of CBD, opinions split on whether CBD products pose safety risks to children. Many were unaware of the rising number of pediatric CBD-related poison control calls.

Key Numbers

Survey conducted among U.S. parents/caregivers; specific sample size and percentage breakdowns available in full text.

How They Did This

Cross-sectional online survey of U.S. parents and caregivers assessing knowledge, perceptions, and behaviors related to CBD products and child safety.

Why This Research Matters

As CBD products proliferate in households, understanding parent awareness of pediatric exposure risks helps inform public health messaging and product safety regulations.

The Bigger Picture

Pediatric exposures to CBD and cannabis products have surged alongside legalization and commercial availability. Parent education remains a gap in harm reduction efforts.

What This Study Doesn't Tell Us

Online survey with potential selection bias. Self-reported data may not reflect actual safety practices. Specific product types and formulations not differentiated.

Questions This Raises

  • ?What interventions most effectively increase parent awareness of CBD exposure risks?
  • ?Should child-resistant packaging mandates extend to all CBD products?

Trust & Context

Key Stat:
Many parents unaware of rising pediatric CBD poison control calls
Evidence Grade:
Cross-sectional survey design with potential selection bias limits causal inference.
Study Age:
2025 study reflecting current CBD market landscape.
Original Title:
Parent and caregiver perceptions of cannabidiol products may put children at risk for unintentional exposure.
Published In:
Frontiers in public health, 13, 1714993 (2025)
Database ID:
RTHC-07105

Evidence Hierarchy

Meta-Analysis / Systematic Review
Randomized Controlled Trial
Cohort / Case-Control
Cross-Sectional / ObservationalSnapshot without intervening
This study
Case Report / Animal Study

A snapshot of a population at one point in time.

What do these levels mean? →

Frequently Asked Questions

Are CBD products dangerous for children?

Pediatric poison control calls involving CBD products have been rising. This survey found many parents were unaware of these risks, suggesting a gap in safety awareness.

Do most parents know about CBD safety risks?

The survey found divided opinions, with a substantial portion of parents uncertain or unaware of the potential hazards CBD products pose to children.

Read More on RethinkTHC

Cite This Study

RTHC-07105·https://rethinkthc.com/research/RTHC-07105

APA

McNally, Michael; McFayden, Michael; Hime, Olivia; Kovasala, Michael; Brown, Grant; Geneau, Hunter; Holmes, Simeon; Brewer, Kori L; Jones, G Kirk. (2025). Parent and caregiver perceptions of cannabidiol products may put children at risk for unintentional exposure.. Frontiers in public health, 13, 1714993. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1714993

MLA

McNally, Michael, et al. "Parent and caregiver perceptions of cannabidiol products may put children at risk for unintentional exposure.." Frontiers in public health, 2025. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1714993

RethinkTHC

RethinkTHC Research Database. "Parent and caregiver perceptions of cannabidiol products may..." RTHC-07105. Retrieved from https://rethinkthc.com/research/mcnally-2025-parent-and-caregiver-perceptions

Access the Original Study

Study data sourced from PubMed, a service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

This study breakdown was produced by the RethinkTHC research team. We analyze and report published research findings without making health recommendations. All interpretations are based solely on the published abstract and study data.