rethinkTHC Search
Menu
Study breakdown

What Australian police seizures reveal about cannabis potency and CBD levels

Cross SectionalModerate evidence
The takeaway

Cannabis seized from Australian street-level users averaged nearly 15% THC with almost no CBD, mirroring high-potency trends seen in other countries.

Read this if you want to understand how potent modern cannabis really is and why the disappearance of CBD from the supply matters.

14.88% average THC with only 0.14% CBD in seized Australian cannabis

What the researchers found

Researchers analyzed 206 cannabis samples confiscated from recreational users under the New South Wales Cannabis Cautioning scheme, along with 26 samples from known indoor or outdoor cultivation sites. The street-level samples averaged 14.88% THC content but only 0.14% CBD.

The near-absence of CBD is notable because CBD is thought to moderate some of the adverse psychological effects of THC. Very low levels of other cannabinoids were also detected, including minimal cannabichromene, cannabinol, and tetrahydrocannabivarin (all below 0.1%).

Samples from known indoor and outdoor cultivation sites showed no significant differences in THC content from each other.

Why it matters

Australia has one of the highest per capita rates of cannabis use globally, yet this was the first systematic analysis of the cannabinoid profile of cannabis available to Australian users. The findings confirmed that the high-THC, low-CBD trend seen in North American and European markets extends to Australia.

The numbers in context

Mean THC content was 14.88%. Mean CBD content was 0.14%. Cannabigerol averaged 1.18%. Other cannabinoids (CBC, CBN, THC-V) were all below 0.1%. A total of 232 samples were analyzed (206 street-level, 26 from cultivation sites).

How the study worked

Researchers used high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) to measure nine cannabinoids in 232 cannabis samples seized by New South Wales police. Street-level samples came from users holding 15 grams or less. Known provenance samples came from larger cultivation operations.

What this study cannot tell us

Samples were limited to New South Wales and may not represent cannabis across all of Australia. Only samples confiscated by police were included, which may not reflect the full range of products available. The study measured cannabinoid content but did not assess health outcomes.

How to read the evidence

Systematic analytical chemistry study of a large sample set, though limited to one Australian state.

When this study was published

Published in 2013. Cannabis potency trends have continued to shift in many markets since this analysis.

The bigger picture

The disappearance of CBD from the cannabis supply has public health implications. Research has suggested that CBD may buffer some of the anxiety and psychosis risk associated with THC. A cannabis market dominated by high-THC, near-zero-CBD products may carry different risk profiles than the more chemically diverse cannabis of previous decades.

Questions still open

  • Are users aware of the very low CBD content in available cannabis? Would access to cannabis with balanced THC-to-CBD ratios lead to different health outcomes? Has the cannabinoid profile of Australian cannabis changed further since 2013?

Common questions

How strong is cannabis in Australia?
This 2013 analysis of seized samples found average THC content of about 15%, comparable to trends in North America and Europe at the time.
Why does the lack of CBD in cannabis matter?
CBD is thought to moderate some adverse psychological effects of THC. When cannabis contains almost no CBD (0.14% average in this study), users get high THC exposure without that potential buffering effect.

Read the original research

Analysis of cannabis seizures in NSW, Australia: cannabis potency and cannabinoid profile.

PloS one, 8(7), e70052

Citation

Swift, Wendy; Wong, Alex; Li, Kong M; Arnold, Jonathon C; McGregor, Iain S. (2013). Analysis of cannabis seizures in NSW, Australia: cannabis potency and cannabinoid profile.. PloS one, 8(7), e70052. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0070052

Explore the wider topic