CBD Improved Antioxidant Status in Rats Over 90 Days, While CBG Caused Liver Damage and Oxidative Stress
In a 90-day rat study, low-dose CBD improved blood and liver antioxidant status with no adverse effects, while CBG at similar doses caused oxidative stress, liver damage, and blood cell abnormalities.
Quick Facts
What This Study Found
CBD (0.66 mg/kg/day for 90 days) produced no changes in blood counts or biochemistry and improved redox status in blood plasma and liver, reducing malondialdehyde and carbonylated proteins. CBG (0.66-1.33 mg/kg/day) increased total oxidative stress, malondialdehyde, and carbonylated proteins, and caused hepatotoxic changes, disrupted white cell counts, and altered ALT, creatinine, and calcium. Both accumulated in tissues at low ng/g levels.
Key Numbers
CBD: 0.66 mg/kg/day, no adverse effects, improved redox markers. CBG: 0.66-1.33 mg/kg/day, increased oxidative stress, hepatotoxic changes, disrupted white cells, altered ALT/creatinine/calcium. Both accumulated at low ng/g in liver, brain, muscle, heart, kidney, skin.
How They Did This
90-day orogastric administration in rats. CBD at 0.66 mg/kg/day, CBG at 0.66/1.33 mg/kg/day. Assessed blood counts, biochemistry, GI and liver histology, oxidative stress markers, and tissue distribution by LC-MS.
Why This Research Matters
CBG is increasingly marketed alongside CBD as a beneficial cannabinoid, but this study shows dramatically different safety profiles. While CBD improved antioxidant status, CBG caused oxidative damage and liver toxicity at comparable doses. This is a critical safety distinction as CBG products proliferate.
The Bigger Picture
The authors attribute the toxicity difference to CBG's extra dimethyloctadienyl structural pattern, which is absent in CBD. This structural difference may explain the redox disruption. As minor cannabinoids like CBG gain popularity, this study is an important safety signal.
What This Study Doesn't Tell Us
Animal study at specific doses that may not reflect human supplementation levels. 90-day duration may not capture longer-term effects. Only two dose levels of CBG tested. Rat metabolism of cannabinoids differs from humans.
Questions This Raises
- ?Are current CBG supplement doses safe for human consumption?
- ?Should CBG products carry safety warnings based on this hepatotoxicity data?
Trust & Context
- Key Stat:
- CBD improved antioxidant status; CBG caused liver damage at the same dose
- Evidence Grade:
- 90-day controlled animal study with comprehensive safety assessment, providing important safety data requiring human confirmation.
- Study Age:
- Published 2023.
- Original Title:
- Safety assessment and redox status in rats after chronic exposure to cannabidiol and cannabigerol.
- Published In:
- Toxicology, 488, 153460 (2023)
- Authors:
- Polanska, Hana Holcova(2), Petrlakova, Katerina(2), Papouskova, Barbora, Hendrych, Michal, Samadian, Amir, Storch, Jan, Babula, Petr, Masarik, Michal, Vacek, Jan
- Database ID:
- RTHC-04853
Evidence Hierarchy
Tests effects in animals (usually mice or rats), not humans.
What do these levels mean? →Frequently Asked Questions
Is CBG as safe as CBD?
This 90-day rat study found CBD improved antioxidant status with no adverse effects, while CBG at comparable doses caused liver damage, oxidative stress, and blood abnormalities. Their safety profiles appear very different.
Does CBD have antioxidant effects?
Yes. In this study, 90 days of CBD reduced markers of oxidative damage (malondialdehyde, carbonylated proteins) in blood and liver, suggesting genuine antioxidant activity in vivo.
Read More on RethinkTHC
- 420-sober-survival-guide
- CBD-oil-quality-guide
- CBT-cannabis-recovery
- anxiety-medication-after-quitting-weed
- cannabis-chemotherapy-nausea
- cannabis-chronic-pain-research
- cannabis-epilepsy-CBD-Epidiolex
- cannabis-relapse-cycle-pattern
- cbd-anxiety-research-evidence
- cbd-for-weed-withdrawal
- cbd-vs-thc-difference
- cold-turkey-vs-taper-quit-weed
- dating-sober-after-quitting-weed
- exercise-quitting-weed-anxiety-brain
- grieving-quitting-weed-loss
- help-someone-quit-weed
- how-to-quit-weed
- journaling-weed-withdrawal
- marijuana-anonymous-SMART-recovery-compare
- medical-benefits-of-cannabis
- meditation-mindfulness-weed-withdrawal
- partner-still-smokes-weed
- partner-still-smokes-weed-quitting
- pink-cloud-sobriety-cannabis
- quit-weed-cold-turkey
- quit-weed-or-cut-back-which-is-better
- quit-weed-regret-went-back
- quitting-weed-20s
- quitting-weed-30s
- quitting-weed-after-years
- quitting-weed-before-surgery
- quitting-weed-during-crisis-divorce-job-loss
- quitting-weed-exercise
- quitting-weed-grief-loss-coping
- quitting-weed-legal-state
- quitting-weed-medication-interactions
- quitting-weed-pregnancy
- quitting-weed-pregnant
- quitting-weed-success-stories
- quitting-weed-triggers-environment
- relapsed-smoking-weed-what-to-do
- relapsed-weed
- seniors-older-adults-cannabis-risks-medications
- should-i-quit-weed
- sober-music-festival-concert-without-weed
- supplements-weed-withdrawal
- telling-friends-quitting-weed
- weed-breastfeeding-THC-breast-milk
- weed-relapse-prevention-plan
- weed-relapse-why-it-happens
- weed-ritual-replacement
- weed-ruined-relationships
- weed-social-media-triggers-quit
Cite This Study
https://rethinkthc.com/research/RTHC-04853APA
Polanska, Hana Holcova; Petrlakova, Katerina; Papouskova, Barbora; Hendrych, Michal; Samadian, Amir; Storch, Jan; Babula, Petr; Masarik, Michal; Vacek, Jan. (2023). Safety assessment and redox status in rats after chronic exposure to cannabidiol and cannabigerol.. Toxicology, 488, 153460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tox.2023.153460
MLA
Polanska, Hana Holcova, et al. "Safety assessment and redox status in rats after chronic exposure to cannabidiol and cannabigerol.." Toxicology, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tox.2023.153460
RethinkTHC
RethinkTHC Research Database. "Safety assessment and redox status in rats after chronic exp..." RTHC-04853. Retrieved from https://rethinkthc.com/research/polanska-2023-safety-assessment-and-redox
Access the Original Study
Study data sourced from PubMed, a service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.
This study breakdown was produced by the RethinkTHC research team. We analyze and report published research findings without making health recommendations. All interpretations are based solely on the published abstract and study data.