Negative emotional tendencies explained the link between low distress tolerance and cannabis use problems in daily users

A study of 203 daily cannabis users found that negative affectivity (the tendency to experience negative emotions) mediated the relationship between low perceived distress tolerance and cannabis use problems, withdrawal, cessation barriers, and low quitting self-efficacy.

Manning, Kara et al.·Addictive behaviors·2018·Moderate EvidenceCross-Sectional
RTHC-01745Cross SectionalModerate Evidence2018RETHINKTHC RESEARCH DATABASErethinkthc.com/research

Quick Facts

Study Type
Cross-Sectional
Evidence
Moderate Evidence
Sample
Not reported

What This Study Found

Researchers studied 203 urban adult daily cannabis users (29.2% female, mean age 37.7, 63% African American) to understand why low distress tolerance is linked to cannabis problems.

Negative affectivity (the general tendency to experience negative emotions) significantly mediated the relationship between distress tolerance and multiple cannabis outcomes:

- Cannabis use problems (b=-0.58, 95% CI [-1.14, -0.21])

- Cannabis withdrawal (b=-0.65, 95% CI [-1.36, -0.21])

- Self-efficacy for quitting (b=-0.83, 95% CI [-1.85, -0.22])

- Perceived barriers to cessation (b=-0.71, 95% CI [-1.51, -0.24])

In other words, people who perceive they cannot tolerate distress tend to experience more negative emotions generally, which in turn drives cannabis problems, withdrawal severity, low confidence in quitting, and perception of more barriers to stopping.

Key Numbers

203 daily cannabis users. 29.2% female, mean age 37.7, 63% African American. Significant indirect effects through negative affectivity on all four outcomes (all confidence intervals excluded zero).

How They Did This

Cross-sectional study of 203 daily cannabis users. Self-report measures of distress tolerance, negative affectivity, cannabis use problems, withdrawal, quitting self-efficacy, and perceived cessation barriers. Mediation analysis to test indirect effects.

Why This Research Matters

Identifying negative affectivity as the mechanism linking distress intolerance to cannabis problems suggests a specific treatment target. Interventions that help daily users manage negative emotions could potentially reduce cannabis problems and improve quitting success.

The Bigger Picture

This fits within a broader understanding of addiction as partly driven by emotional dysregulation. Rather than cannabis use being a "choice" issue, it may be fundamentally an emotion management issue for daily users, with cannabis serving as an ineffective coping strategy.

What This Study Doesn't Tell Us

Cross-sectional design cannot establish causal direction. Self-report measures of all variables. Sample limited to urban daily users, mostly African American, so generalizability is uncertain. Distress tolerance was measured as perceived capability, not actual behavioral tolerance.

Questions This Raises

  • ?Would emotion regulation interventions reduce cannabis problems in daily users?
  • ?Is negative affectivity a cause of cannabis problems or a consequence of daily use?
  • ?Would these findings replicate in non-urban or less frequent user populations?

Trust & Context

Key Stat:
Negative affectivity mediated the link between distress intolerance and all four cannabis outcomes
Evidence Grade:
Moderate. Clear mediation findings with appropriate statistical methods, but cross-sectional design limits causal inference.
Study Age:
Published in 2018. Emotion-focused approaches to cannabis use disorder treatment have continued to develop.
Original Title:
Negative affectivity as a mechanism underlying perceived distress tolerance and cannabis use problems, barriers to cessation, and self-efficacy for quitting among urban cannabis users.
Published In:
Addictive behaviors, 78, 216-222 (2018)
Database ID:
RTHC-01745

Evidence Hierarchy

Meta-Analysis / Systematic Review
Randomized Controlled Trial
Cohort / Case-Control
Cross-Sectional / ObservationalSnapshot without intervening
This study
Case Report / Animal Study

A snapshot of a population at one point in time.

What do these levels mean? →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is negative affectivity?

Negative affectivity is a personality trait reflecting the tendency to experience negative emotional states like anxiety, sadness, irritability, and nervousness. People high in negative affectivity tend to see the world more negatively and experience more emotional distress in daily life.

How could this help with cannabis treatment?

If negative affectivity is the key mechanism, then therapies targeting emotion regulation (like cognitive behavioral therapy, mindfulness, or dialectical behavior therapy) might be more effective than approaches focused solely on cannabis use behaviors. Treating the emotional root could address multiple cannabis outcomes simultaneously.

Read More on RethinkTHC

Cite This Study

RTHC-01745·https://rethinkthc.com/research/RTHC-01745

APA

Manning, Kara; Paulus, Daniel J; Hogan, Julianna B D; Buckner, Julia D; Farris, Samantha G; Zvolensky, Michael J. (2018). Negative affectivity as a mechanism underlying perceived distress tolerance and cannabis use problems, barriers to cessation, and self-efficacy for quitting among urban cannabis users.. Addictive behaviors, 78, 216-222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.11.041

MLA

Manning, Kara, et al. "Negative affectivity as a mechanism underlying perceived distress tolerance and cannabis use problems, barriers to cessation, and self-efficacy for quitting among urban cannabis users.." Addictive behaviors, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.11.041

RethinkTHC

RethinkTHC Research Database. "Negative affectivity as a mechanism underlying perceived dis..." RTHC-01745. Retrieved from https://rethinkthc.com/research/manning-2018-negative-affectivity-as-a

Access the Original Study

Study data sourced from PubMed, a service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

This study breakdown was produced by the RethinkTHC research team. We analyze and report published research findings without making health recommendations. All interpretations are based solely on the published abstract and study data.