An Interdisciplinary Cannabis Training Program Improved Healthcare Trainees' Confidence

A virtual cannabis education program for healthcare trainees across four disciplines achieved strong satisfaction ratings, with 96% reporting improved ability to counsel patients about cannabis.

Cronin, Sean P et al.·Journal of cannabis research·2025·Preliminary EvidenceCross-Sectional
RTHC-06272Cross SectionalPreliminary Evidence2025RETHINKTHC RESEARCH DATABASErethinkthc.com/research

Quick Facts

Study Type
Cross-Sectional
Evidence
Preliminary Evidence
Sample
Not reported

What This Study Found

345 trainees in pharmacy, nursing, public health, and medicine completed the program. 96% reported improved ability to respond to patients interested in cannabis.

Key Numbers

345 trainees certified since 2023. 90% agreed it addressed a training need. 83% said it should be required. 96% reported improved patient response ability.

How They Did This

Implementation study using post-training surveys. The virtual training was developed using intervention mapping with four key strategies.

Why This Research Matters

Cannabis use is surging but healthcare professional training on cannabis remains minimal.

The Bigger Picture

As cannabis legalization expands, the gap between patient cannabis use and clinician knowledge grows.

What This Study Doesn't Tell Us

No control group or pre-post knowledge assessment. Self-reported satisfaction only.

Questions This Raises

  • ?Do trainees who complete this program actually provide better cannabis-related care?

Trust & Context

Key Stat:
96% of trainees reported improved ability to respond to cannabis-related patient questions
Evidence Grade:
Implementation study using satisfaction surveys without controls.
Study Age:
2025 publication covering training since 2023
Original Title:
"It's legal, now what?" development, implementation, and evaluation of interdisciplinary cannabis education for healthcare trainees.
Published In:
Journal of cannabis research, 7(1), 68 (2025)
Database ID:
RTHC-06272

Evidence Hierarchy

Meta-Analysis / Systematic Review
Randomized Controlled Trial
Cohort / Case-Control
Cross-Sectional / ObservationalSnapshot without intervening
This study
Case Report / Animal Study

A snapshot of a population at one point in time.

What do these levels mean? →

Frequently Asked Questions

Why do healthcare professionals need cannabis-specific training?

Most medical, nursing, and pharmacy programs include little or no cannabis education. Patients increasingly ask clinicians about cannabis.

What topics did the training cover?

Cannabis epidemiology, treatment applications, safety recommendations, potential risks and benefits, community resources, and patient-provider communication.

Read More on RethinkTHC

Cite This Study

RTHC-06272·https://rethinkthc.com/research/RTHC-06272

APA

Cronin, Sean P; Cruz, Josue; Cameron, Elena; Azemar, Sabrina; Dudley, Steven; Largent-Milnes, Tally M; Brady, Benjamin R; Wallace, Jessica S; Arnett, Margie R; Dahmer, Stephen M; Ibrahim, Mohab M; Padilla, Alyssa R; Vanderah, Todd W; De La Rosa, Jennifer S. (2025). "It's legal, now what?" development, implementation, and evaluation of interdisciplinary cannabis education for healthcare trainees.. Journal of cannabis research, 7(1), 68. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42238-025-00321-8

MLA

Cronin, Sean P, et al. ""It's legal, now what?" development, implementation, and evaluation of interdisciplinary cannabis education for healthcare trainees.." Journal of cannabis research, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42238-025-00321-8

RethinkTHC

RethinkTHC Research Database. ""It's legal, now what?" development, implementation, and eva..." RTHC-06272. Retrieved from https://rethinkthc.com/research/cronin-2025-its-legal-now-what

Access the Original Study

Study data sourced from PubMed, a service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

This study breakdown was produced by the RethinkTHC research team. We analyze and report published research findings without making health recommendations. All interpretations are based solely on the published abstract and study data.