rethinkTHC Search
Menu
Study breakdown

Brain Scans Reveal How Cannabis Cues Hijack Attention in People with Use Disorder

Cross SectionalModerate evidence
The takeaway

People with moderate-to-severe cannabis use disorder show heightened brain activity across addiction-related circuits when exposed to cannabis images, correlating with arousal and withdrawal severity.

Addiction neuroscientists, CUD treatment developers, neuromarketing regulators

What the researchers found

Compared to controls, individuals with CUD showed greater cannabis cue reactivity in occipital, orbitofrontal, cingulate, cerebellar, hippocampal, temporal, and parietal cortices. Greater occipital/cerebellar activity correlated with subjective arousal and cannabis withdrawal. Anterior cingulate/parietal activity negatively correlated with urinary THC metabolite levels.

Why it matters

Understanding the neural basis of cannabis craving is essential for developing treatments that can break the cycle of cue-triggered relapse. These findings show cannabis cues activate the same addiction circuits seen with other substances.

The numbers in context

65 CUD participants, 43 controls. Heightened activity in multiple regions (p<0.001, FWE corrected, k>10). Occipital/cerebellar activity correlated with arousal and withdrawal. Anterior cingulate/parietal activity negatively correlated with THC metabolite:creatinine ratio.

How the study worked

fMRI cannabis cue-reactivity task in 65 individuals with moderate-to-severe CUD (non-treatment-seeking, with past quit attempts) and 43 controls. Group differences analyzed adjusting for age and sex; correlations with cannabis use characteristics and mental health assessed.

What this study cannot tell us

Cross-sectional — cannot determine if brain differences preceded CUD. Non-treatment-seeking sample may differ from those in treatment. Static images may not capture real-world cue reactivity (smell, social context). Modest sample size.

How to read the evidence

Rigorous fMRI methodology with family-wise error correction, limited by moderate sample size and cross-sectional design.

When this study was published

Published 2026, first large cue-reactivity study in non-treatment-seeking CUD.

The bigger picture

As cannabis marketing expands with legalization, people with CUD face increasing exposure to cues that their brains are wired to overreact to. This neuroimaging evidence supports the argument for regulating cannabis marketing similar to tobacco and alcohol.

Questions still open

  • Could neurofeedback targeting these circuits reduce craving? Do these neural patterns predict relapse? Would mindfulness-based interventions dampen cue reactivity? How does marketing exposure affect these circuits over time?

Common questions

Do cannabis ads trigger cravings in people with use disorder?
Brain scans show that people with cannabis use disorder have significantly heightened activity across attention, motivation, and reward circuits when viewing cannabis images — activity that correlates with how aroused they feel and how severe their withdrawal symptoms are.
Is cannabis addiction similar to other addictions in the brain?
Yes — the brain circuits activated by cannabis cues in people with CUD (salience evaluation, motivation, disinhibition) are consistent with prominent theories of addiction and findings with other substances like alcohol and opioids.

Read the original research

The Neurocircuitry of Cannabis Cue Reactivity in Cannabis Use Disorder: A Functional Neuroimaging Study.

Biological psychiatry global open science, 6(1), 100638

Citation

Lorenzetti, Valentina; Sehl, Hannah; Arun, Arush Honnedevasthana; McTavish, Eugene; Clemente, Adam; Thomson, Hannah; Quinones-Valera, Marianna; Gaillard, Alexandra; Beyer, Emillie; Thomson, Diny; Cousijn, Janna; Labuschagne, Izelle; Rendell, Peter; Terrett, Gill; Suo, Chao; Greenwood, Lisa-Marie; Manning, Victoria; Poudel, Govinda. (2026). The Neurocircuitry of Cannabis Cue Reactivity in Cannabis Use Disorder: A Functional Neuroimaging Study.. Biological psychiatry global open science, 6(1), 100638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpsgos.2025.100638

Explore the wider topic