People with suspected cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome remain skeptical about the diagnosis
Interviews with 24 chronic cannabis users with cyclic vomiting found many remained uncertain that cannabis caused their symptoms, and felt clinical recommendations to simply quit failed to address the complexity of stopping.
Quick Facts
What This Study Found
Twenty-four participants with chronic cannabis use and cyclic vomiting attributed their symptoms to food, alcohol, stress, and GI issues rather than cannabis. Many relied on at-home internet research to understand their condition. Clinical treatment focused on cannabis cessation, but patients felt this failed to acknowledge the difficulty of quitting and the therapeutic benefits they perceived from cannabis.
Key Numbers
24 participants interviewed; recruited from Rhode Island ED prospective cohort; many attributed symptoms to food, alcohol, stress rather than cannabis
How They Did This
Semi-structured interviews with 24 participants recruited from a prospective cohort of patients presenting to Rhode Island emergency departments with cyclic vomiting and chronic cannabis use. Thematic analysis using NVivo.
Why This Research Matters
CHS diagnosis requires accepting that a substance many use for nausea relief is actually causing nausea. Understanding patient skepticism can help clinicians communicate more effectively and develop support strategies beyond simple cessation advice.
The Bigger Picture
The disconnect between clinical understanding of CHS and patient experience highlights the need for patient-centered approaches that acknowledge the complexity of chronic cannabis use while providing evidence about the condition.
What This Study Doesn't Tell Us
Small qualitative sample from one state. Participants may not have had confirmed CHS (diagnosis was clinical). Self-selection may have favored those more willing to discuss cannabis use.
Questions This Raises
- ?Would gradual dose reduction instead of cessation be acceptable to CHS patients?
- ?Are there biomarkers that could help patients accept the cannabis-symptom connection?
Trust & Context
- Key Stat:
- Many patients attributed vomiting to food, stress, or GI issues rather than cannabis
- Evidence Grade:
- Qualitative study with thematic analysis providing patient perspective, but small single-site sample with unconfirmed CHS diagnoses.
- Study Age:
- Published 2023
- Original Title:
- "I still partly think this is bullshit": A qualitative analysis of cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome perceptions among people with chronic cannabis use and cyclic vomiting.
- Published In:
- Drug and alcohol dependence, 246, 109853 (2023)
- Authors:
- Collins, Alexandra B(4), Beaudoin, Francesca L(8), Metrik, Jane(16), Wightman, Rachel S
- Database ID:
- RTHC-04469
Evidence Hierarchy
Uses interviews or focus groups to understand experiences in depth.
What do these levels mean? →Frequently Asked Questions
Do people with CHS believe cannabis is causing their symptoms?
Many do not. In this study, participants with chronic cannabis use and cyclic vomiting often attributed symptoms to food, alcohol, stress, or GI issues, and remained uncertain about the cannabis connection.
Why is quitting cannabis hard for CHS patients?
Patients reported that cessation recommendations failed to consider the chronicity of their use, the therapeutic benefits they perceived (like anxiety relief), and the challenge of stopping a deeply embedded habit.
Read More on RethinkTHC
- 420-sober-survival-guide
- CBT-cannabis-recovery
- THC-potency-increase-over-time
- cannabis-harm-reduction-opioids-alcohol-replacement
- cannabis-legalization-effects-health-data
- cannabis-relapse-cycle-pattern
- cannabis-tolerance-break-guide
- cold-turkey-vs-taper-quit-weed
- dating-sober-after-quitting-weed
- exercise-quitting-weed-anxiety-brain
- grieving-quitting-weed-loss
- help-someone-quit-weed
- how-to-cut-back-on-weed-moderation
- how-to-quit-weed
- journaling-weed-withdrawal
- marijuana-anonymous-SMART-recovery-compare
- meditation-mindfulness-weed-withdrawal
- microdosing-cannabis-benefits
- partner-still-smokes-weed
- partner-still-smokes-weed-quitting
- pink-cloud-sobriety-cannabis
- quit-weed-cold-turkey
- quit-weed-or-cut-back-which-is-better
- quit-weed-regret-went-back
- quitting-weed-20s
- quitting-weed-30s
- quitting-weed-after-years
- quitting-weed-during-crisis-divorce-job-loss
- quitting-weed-exercise
- quitting-weed-grief-loss-coping
- quitting-weed-legal-state
- quitting-weed-success-stories
- quitting-weed-triggers-environment
- relapsed-smoking-weed-what-to-do
- relapsed-weed
- safer-cannabis-use-guidelines
- should-i-quit-weed
- sober-music-festival-concert-without-weed
- sober-october-weed
- supplements-weed-withdrawal
- telling-friends-quitting-weed
- tolerance-break-weed
- weed-for-opioid-withdrawal
- weed-relapse-prevention-plan
- weed-relapse-why-it-happens
- weed-ritual-replacement
- weed-ruined-relationships
- weed-social-media-triggers-quit
Cite This Study
https://rethinkthc.com/research/RTHC-04469APA
Collins, Alexandra B; Beaudoin, Francesca L; Metrik, Jane; Wightman, Rachel S. (2023). "I still partly think this is bullshit": A qualitative analysis of cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome perceptions among people with chronic cannabis use and cyclic vomiting.. Drug and alcohol dependence, 246, 109853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2023.109853
MLA
Collins, Alexandra B, et al. ""I still partly think this is bullshit": A qualitative analysis of cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome perceptions among people with chronic cannabis use and cyclic vomiting.." Drug and alcohol dependence, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2023.109853
RethinkTHC
RethinkTHC Research Database. ""I still partly think this is bullshit": A qualitative analy..." RTHC-04469. Retrieved from https://rethinkthc.com/research/collins-2023-i-still-partly-think
Access the Original Study
Study data sourced from PubMed, a service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.
This study breakdown was produced by the RethinkTHC research team. We analyze and report published research findings without making health recommendations. All interpretations are based solely on the published abstract and study data.