Secondhand Cannabis Smoke Produced Detectable THC in Blood and Urine of Non-Smokers

Five people who never used cannabis tested positive for THC in blood and cannabinoids in urine after sitting in a car where others smoked marijuana for 30 minutes.

Mørland, J et al.·Journal of forensic sciences·1985·Preliminary EvidenceProspective Cohort
RTHC-00029Prospective CohortPreliminary Evidence1985RETHINKTHC RESEARCH DATABASErethinkthc.com/research

Quick Facts

Study Type
Prospective Cohort
Evidence
Preliminary Evidence
Sample
Not reported

What This Study Found

Five healthy volunteers who had never used cannabis sat in a small closed car (approximately 1,650 liters of air) while other people smoked marijuana or hashish for 30 minutes.

Immediately after exposure, THC was detectable in the blood of all five passive smokers at concentrations ranging from 1.3 to 6.3 nanograms per milliliter. Total cannabinoid blood levels exceeded 13 ng/mL in four of the five volunteers. Both THC and total cannabinoid concentrations dropped to near the detection limits of the assays within two hours.

Cannabinoids were also detectable in urine using both radioimmunoassay and EMIT testing methods. The researchers concluded that detecting cannabinoids in blood or urine is not unequivocal proof that someone actively smoked cannabis.

Key Numbers

Five volunteers. 30-minute exposure. Car air volume: approximately 1,650 L. Blood THC range: 1.3 to 6.3 ng/mL immediately after exposure. Blood levels fell near detection limits within 2 hours. Urine positive by both RIA (above 13 ng/mL) and EMIT (above 20 ng/mL).

How They Did This

Prospective study with five cannabis-naive volunteers passively exposed to cannabis smoke in a closed car (approximately 1,650 L air volume) for 30 minutes. Blood and urine were collected at multiple time points and tested using GC-MS for THC and RIA/EMIT for total cannabinoids.

Why This Research Matters

This study had direct implications for drug testing in workplaces, law enforcement, and forensic settings. It demonstrated that positive drug tests could result from passive exposure rather than active use, raising questions about the validity of drug test results as proof of cannabis consumption.

The Bigger Picture

This study launched decades of debate about passive cannabis exposure and drug testing. While modern studies have generally shown that realistic passive exposure (in ventilated spaces) rarely produces positive results at current testing thresholds, extreme exposure conditions can still trigger positive tests, an issue that remains relevant for workplace and legal drug testing.

What This Study Doesn't Tell Us

The exposure conditions were extreme: a small closed car with active smoking for 30 minutes. This does not represent typical secondhand exposure in normal indoor or outdoor environments. Only five participants. The study did not assess whether the absorbed THC levels produced any psychoactive effects.

Questions This Raises

  • ?At what exposure levels does passive inhalation fail to produce detectable cannabinoids?
  • ?Do modern drug testing cutoffs adequately account for passive exposure?
  • ?Did the participants experience any psychoactive effects at the detected blood levels?

Trust & Context

Key Stat:
Blood THC reached 1.3 to 6.3 ng/mL from passive exposure alone
Evidence Grade:
A controlled prospective study with objective measurements, but only five participants and extreme exposure conditions limit generalizability to real-world scenarios.
Study Age:
Published in 1985. Drug testing cutoff thresholds and assay sensitivities have changed since this study was conducted.
Original Title:
Cannabinoids in blood and urine after passive inhalation of Cannabis smoke.
Published In:
Journal of forensic sciences, 30(4), 997-1002 (1985)
Database ID:
RTHC-00029

Evidence Hierarchy

Meta-Analysis / Systematic Review
Randomized Controlled Trial
Cohort / Case-ControlFollows or compares groups over time
This study
Cross-Sectional / Observational
Case Report / Animal Study

Enrolls participants and follows them forward in time.

What do these levels mean? →

Frequently Asked Questions

Can you fail a drug test from secondhand cannabis smoke?

In this study, 30 minutes in a small closed car with active smokers produced positive blood and urine tests. However, the exposure conditions were extreme and may not reflect typical real-world secondhand exposure.

How long did the THC stay in their blood?

Blood THC and cannabinoid levels fell to near detection limits within two hours after the 30-minute exposure ended.

Read More on RethinkTHC

Cite This Study

RTHC-00029·https://rethinkthc.com/research/RTHC-00029

APA

Mørland, J; Bugge, A; Skuterud, B; Steen, A; Wethe, G H; Kjeldsen, T. (1985). Cannabinoids in blood and urine after passive inhalation of Cannabis smoke.. Journal of forensic sciences, 30(4), 997-1002.

MLA

Mørland, J, et al. "Cannabinoids in blood and urine after passive inhalation of Cannabis smoke.." Journal of forensic sciences, 1985.

RethinkTHC

RethinkTHC Research Database. "Cannabinoids in blood and urine after passive inhalation of ..." RTHC-00029. Retrieved from https://rethinkthc.com/research/morland-1985-cannabinoids-in-blood-and

Access the Original Study

Study data sourced from PubMed, a service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

This study breakdown was produced by the RethinkTHC research team. We analyze and report published research findings without making health recommendations. All interpretations are based solely on the published abstract and study data.