People of Color Are Severely Underrepresented in Cannabis Use Disorder Treatment Research
White participants were included at 49 times their share of cannabis use disorder cases in behavioral health trials, while no studies were culturally adapted for people of color.
Quick Facts
What This Study Found
Of 14 cannabis use disorder behavioral health RCTs (1994-2025), White people comprised 64% of participants despite having a smaller share of CUD cases, overrepresented at 49 times their proportional rate. Black participants were 19%, Latino 5%, Asian 0.6%, and Indigenous 0.4%. Zero studies were culturally adapted or designed to address challenges specific to people of color. Diversity has not improved over time.
Key Numbers
966 studies screened, 14 met criteria. White: 64% of participants (49x overrepresentation). Black: 19%. Latino: 5%. Multiracial/other: 0.8%. Asian: 0.6%. Indigenous: 0.4%. Zero culturally adapted studies.
How They Did This
Systematic review of PubMed, PsycINFO, and ClinicalTrials.gov for US-based adult cannabis use disorder behavioral health RCTs, identifying 14 of 966 studies for review.
Why This Research Matters
People of color have higher CUD prevalence and severity, face unique challenges like racial discrimination, and experience more severe legal consequences of cannabis use. Yet the treatments being developed are overwhelmingly tested on White populations with no cultural adaptation.
The Bigger Picture
This is part of a broader pattern in clinical research where treatment approaches are developed for and tested on predominantly White populations, then applied to diverse communities without adaptation. For CUD specifically, this means treatments may not address the role of racial discrimination, differential policing, and cultural factors in cannabis use patterns.
What This Study Doesn't Tell Us
Only US-based behavioral health RCTs were included. The small number of eligible studies (14) reflects the limited CUD treatment research overall. Self-identified race categories may not capture nuanced identities.
Questions This Raises
- ?Would culturally adapted CUD treatments be more effective for people of color?
- ?What specific modifications are needed to address the role of racial discrimination in CUD development and maintenance?
Trust & Context
- Key Stat:
- 49x overrepresentation of White participants in CUD trials
- Evidence Grade:
- Systematic review of all eligible US-based CUD behavioral health RCTs, providing a comprehensive assessment of the research landscape.
- Study Age:
- 2026 review covering 1994-2025.
- Original Title:
- Racial diversity in cannabis use disorder research: A systematic review.
- Published In:
- Drug and alcohol dependence, 278, 113008 (2026)
- Authors:
- Reid, Mallet R, Reynolds, Blake, Cape, Jacqueline, Ahmed, Zara, Ali, Hashim, Jaimes-Bautista, Edgar, Gott, Connor, Barajas, Arturo, Müller, Frank, Alshaarawy, Omayma
- Database ID:
- RTHC-08578
Evidence Hierarchy
Analyzes all available research on a topic using a structured method.
What do these levels mean? →Frequently Asked Questions
Why does racial representation in research matter?
Treatments tested primarily on White populations may not work as well for other groups, especially when cultural factors like racial discrimination play a role in the condition being treated.
Has diversity in CUD research improved?
No. Despite decades of calls for more inclusive research, the racial composition of CUD clinical trials has not improved over time.
Read More on RethinkTHC
- 420-sober-survival-guide
- CBT-cannabis-recovery
- cannabis-dependence-physical-psychological-addiction-science
- cannabis-perception-vs-evidence-gap
- cannabis-relapse-cycle-pattern
- cannabis-use-disorder-test
- cold-turkey-vs-taper-quit-weed
- cross-addiction-quit-weed-start-drinking
- dating-sober-after-quitting-weed
- exercise-quitting-weed-anxiety-brain
- grieving-quitting-weed-loss
- help-someone-quit-weed
- how-to-quit-weed
- is-weed-addictive
- is-weed-addictive-science
- journaling-weed-withdrawal
- marijuana-anonymous-SMART-recovery-compare
- meditation-mindfulness-weed-withdrawal
- partner-still-smokes-weed
- partner-still-smokes-weed-quitting
- pink-cloud-sobriety-cannabis
- quit-weed-cold-turkey
- quit-weed-or-cut-back-which-is-better
- quit-weed-regret-went-back
- quitting-weed-20s
- quitting-weed-30s
- quitting-weed-after-years
- quitting-weed-and-alcohol
- quitting-weed-during-crisis-divorce-job-loss
- quitting-weed-exercise
- quitting-weed-grief-loss-coping
- quitting-weed-legal-state
- quitting-weed-success-stories
- quitting-weed-triggers-environment
- rehab-for-weed-addiction-necessary
- relapsed-smoking-weed-what-to-do
- relapsed-weed
- should-i-quit-weed
- signs-of-cannabis-use-disorder
- sober-music-festival-concert-without-weed
- supplements-weed-withdrawal
- telling-friends-quitting-weed
- weed-relapse-prevention-plan
- weed-relapse-why-it-happens
- weed-ritual-replacement
- weed-ruined-relationships
- weed-social-media-triggers-quit
- weed-vape-pen-addiction
Cite This Study
https://rethinkthc.com/research/RTHC-08578APA
Reid, Mallet R; Reynolds, Blake; Cape, Jacqueline; Ahmed, Zara; Ali, Hashim; Jaimes-Bautista, Edgar; Gott, Connor; Barajas, Arturo; Müller, Frank; Alshaarawy, Omayma. (2026). Racial diversity in cannabis use disorder research: A systematic review.. Drug and alcohol dependence, 278, 113008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2025.113008
MLA
Reid, Mallet R, et al. "Racial diversity in cannabis use disorder research: A systematic review.." Drug and alcohol dependence, 2026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2025.113008
RethinkTHC
RethinkTHC Research Database. "Racial diversity in cannabis use disorder research: A system..." RTHC-08578. Retrieved from https://rethinkthc.com/research/reid-2026-racial-diversity-in-cannabis
Access the Original Study
Study data sourced from PubMed, a service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.
This study breakdown was produced by the RethinkTHC research team. We analyze and report published research findings without making health recommendations. All interpretations are based solely on the published abstract and study data.