Digital interventions reduced young adults cannabis use by nearly 7 days per month

A meta-analysis of 19 RCTs found digital interventions for young adults reduced cannabis use frequency by about 7 days per month at 3-month follow-up, with feedback on behavior being the most common active ingredient.

Côté, José et al.·Journal of medical Internet research·2024·Moderate EvidenceMeta-Analysis
RTHC-05232Meta AnalysisModerate Evidence2024RETHINKTHC RESEARCH DATABASErethinkthc.com/research

Quick Facts

Study Type
Meta-Analysis
Evidence
Moderate Evidence
Sample
N=6,710

What This Study Found

Digital interventions reduced cannabis use frequency by 6.79 days in the previous month at 3-month follow-up (95% CI: -9.59 to -4.00, p<.001) compared to controls. 184 behavior change techniques were identified across interventions (range 5-19 per intervention). Feedback on behavior was the most common technique (89% of interventions). Most interventions were web-based.

Key Numbers

19 RCTs, 6,710 participants. Cannabis use reduction: 6.79 fewer days/month at 3 months (p<.001). 184 behavior change techniques identified. Feedback on behavior used in 89% of interventions. 47% of studies showed intervention effect on frequency.

How They Did This

Systematic review and meta-analysis of 19 RCTs (n=6,710) from 7 databases through February 2023. Included web- or mobile-based interventions for cannabis use in community-dwelling young adults (16-35). Random-effects model with standardized mean differences. Behavior change technique coding applied.

Why This Research Matters

Young adults are the heaviest cannabis users but least likely to seek traditional treatment. Digital interventions can reach this population at scale, and this meta-analysis shows they produce meaningful reductions in use frequency.

The Bigger Picture

The digital intervention field for cannabis is growing rapidly. This meta-analysis establishes that web and mobile approaches can meaningfully reduce use in young adults, though questions remain about optimal dosing, duration, and which specific techniques drive the effect.

What This Study Doesn't Tell Us

High heterogeneity across studies. Mix of passive and active control conditions. Most interventions were web-based, limiting conclusions about mobile apps specifically. 3-month follow-up may not reflect long-term outcomes. Behavior change technique analysis identifies common ingredients but not which are most effective.

Questions This Raises

  • ?What is the optimal duration and frequency for digital cannabis interventions?
  • ?Which specific behavior change techniques drive the reduction in use?
  • ?Would digital interventions work for heavier users or those with CUD?

Trust & Context

Key Stat:
6.79 fewer days of cannabis use per month with digital interventions
Evidence Grade:
Systematic review and meta-analysis of 19 RCTs with large pooled sample. Limited by heterogeneity across studies and short follow-up periods.
Study Age:
Published in 2024 in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, covering literature through February 2023.
Original Title:
Digital Interventions for Recreational Cannabis Use Among Young Adults: Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Behavior Change Technique Analysis of Randomized Controlled Studies.
Published In:
Journal of medical Internet research, 26, e55031 (2024)
Database ID:
RTHC-05232

Evidence Hierarchy

Meta-Analysis / Systematic ReviewCombines many studies into one answer
This study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Cohort / Case-Control
Cross-Sectional / Observational
Case Report / Animal Study

Combines results from multiple studies to find an overall pattern.

What do these levels mean? →

Frequently Asked Questions

Can an app help reduce cannabis use?

This meta-analysis found that web and mobile-based interventions reduced cannabis use by about 7 fewer days per month in young adults. Most effective programs included personalized feedback about the user's cannabis use behavior.

How much did digital interventions reduce cannabis use?

On average, young adults using digital interventions used cannabis about 7 fewer days per month at 3-month follow-up compared to those who received no intervention or minimal information.

Read More on RethinkTHC

Cite This Study

RTHC-05232·https://rethinkthc.com/research/RTHC-05232

APA

Côté, José; Chicoine, Gabrielle; Vinette, Billy; Auger, Patricia; Rouleau, Geneviève; Fontaine, Guillaume; Jutras-Aswad, Didier. (2024). Digital Interventions for Recreational Cannabis Use Among Young Adults: Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Behavior Change Technique Analysis of Randomized Controlled Studies.. Journal of medical Internet research, 26, e55031. https://doi.org/10.2196/55031

MLA

Côté, José, et al. "Digital Interventions for Recreational Cannabis Use Among Young Adults: Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Behavior Change Technique Analysis of Randomized Controlled Studies.." Journal of medical Internet research, 2024. https://doi.org/10.2196/55031

RethinkTHC

RethinkTHC Research Database. "Digital Interventions for Recreational Cannabis Use Among Yo..." RTHC-05232. Retrieved from https://rethinkthc.com/research/cote-2024-digital-interventions-for-recreational

Access the Original Study

Study data sourced from PubMed, a service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

This study breakdown was produced by the RethinkTHC research team. We analyze and report published research findings without making health recommendations. All interpretations are based solely on the published abstract and study data.