rethinkTHC Search
Menu
Study breakdown

Youth, parents, and providers in Ontario described barriers to reducing cannabis harms after legalization

QualitativePreliminary evidence
The takeaway

Interviews with 88 people in Ontario revealed widespread concern about youth cannabis risks alongside normalization of use, with all groups identifying structural barriers like inaccessible services and inadequate public education.

Cannabis policy makers, youth substance use counselors, and harm reduction program designers

88 participants across three stakeholder groups

What the researchers found

Two themes emerged around perceived harms: concerns about addiction, brain development, motivation, and mental health impacts; and minimization of risks through conflicting messages, normalization, and perceptions of cannabis as less harmful than other substances. Harm reduction themes included implementation challenges and structural barriers such as unavailable services, easy cannabis access, and insufficient public education.

Why it matters

Five years after Canadian legalization, hearing directly from youth, parents, and service providers about what is and is not working for harm reduction provides actionable insights for policy improvement.

The numbers in context

88 participants: 31 youth, 26 parents, 31 service providers; 4 main themes identified; structural barriers included unavailable/inaccessible services, easy access to cannabis, inadequate public education, and insufficient lower-risk use guidelines

How the study worked

Community-based participatory research in partnership with Families for Addiction Recovery. Virtual semi-structured interviews with 88 participants (31 youth, 26 parents, 31 service providers) in Ontario, Canada. Data analyzed using thematic analysis.

What this study cannot tell us

Participants recruited through an addiction recovery charity, potentially skewing toward those with negative experiences; Ontario-specific findings; qualitative design not generalizable; no quantitative outcome measures

How to read the evidence

Qualitative study with purposive sampling through an addiction recovery organization, providing rich descriptive data but not population-representative.

When this study was published

2024 study conducted post-2018 Canadian legalization

The bigger picture

Canada legalized cannabis partly to protect youth, but this study suggests the public education and harm reduction components have not kept pace with legalization, leaving youth, parents, and providers struggling to navigate the new landscape.

Questions still open

  • What specific harm reduction messages resonate with youth versus parents? How can provinces improve service accessibility? Would standardized lower-risk guidelines reduce youth harms?

Common questions

What concerned youth, parents, and providers most about cannabis?
All groups raised concerns about addiction, brain development, impacts on motivation and concentration, and mental health effects. At the same time, they described a culture of normalization and conflicting messages that made it difficult to take cannabis risks seriously.
What barriers exist for harm reduction?
Participants identified structural barriers including unavailable and inaccessible services, easy access to cannabis for youth despite legal age restrictions, inadequate public education campaigns, and insufficient information about lower-risk cannabis use guidelines.

Read the original research

Reducing the harms of cannabis use in youth post-legalization: insights from Ontario youth, parents, and service providers.

Harm reduction journal, 21(1), 193

Citation

Kourgiantakis, Toula; Hamilton, Angie; Tait, Christine; Tekirdag Kosar, A Kumsal; Lau, Carrie K Y; McNeil, Sandra; Lee, Eunjung; Craig, Shelley; Goldstein, Abby L. (2024). Reducing the harms of cannabis use in youth post-legalization: insights from Ontario youth, parents, and service providers.. Harm reduction journal, 21(1), 193. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12954-024-01112-9

Explore the wider topic