Prenatal care providers avoid cannabis conversations to maintain patient trust
Maternal health providers in safety-net settings reported relying on self-education about cannabis, taking case-by-case approaches, and often avoiding cannabis discussions to preserve therapeutic relationships with patients.
Quick Facts
What This Study Found
Interviews with 10 maternal health providers revealed three patterns: relying on self-education due to lack of formal training, taking case-by-case approaches rather than following standardized protocols, and actively avoiding cannabis discussions to maintain patient alliances. Providers recognized that reluctance to counsel overlooks the lack of resources and healthcare alternatives available to low-income patients.
Key Numbers
10 providers interviewed (2 midwives, 6 OB/GYNs, 2 residents); all in Southern California safety-net settings; interviews conducted March-April 2022
How They Did This
Qualitative constructivist grounded theory study with semi-structured remote interviews of 10 providers (2 midwives, 6 OB/GYN physicians, 2 residents) in Southern California safety-net settings, conducted March-April 2022.
Why This Research Matters
When providers avoid cannabis discussions to preserve relationships, patients in safety-net settings lose access to one of their few sources of medical guidance, potentially reinforcing health disparities.
The Bigger Picture
The tension between maintaining therapeutic relationships and providing evidence-based counseling reflects a broader challenge in prenatal care as cannabis use becomes more normalized.
What This Study Doesn't Tell Us
Small sample of 10 providers from one region. Safety-net setting focus may not reflect private practice perspectives. Self-selected participants may represent those more willing to discuss cannabis.
Questions This Raises
- ?Would structured training and nonpunitive policies increase provider willingness to discuss cannabis?
- ?How do patients in safety-net settings perceive provider silence about cannabis?
Trust & Context
- Key Stat:
- Providers actively avoided cannabis discussions to preserve patient trust
- Evidence Grade:
- Small qualitative study with grounded theory methodology; provides rich contextual data but limited generalizability.
- Study Age:
- Published 2023
- Original Title:
- Legislation has Changed But Issues Remain: Provider Perceptions of Caring for People Who Use Cannabis During Pregnancy in Safety Net Health Settings, a Qualitative Pilot Study.
- Published In:
- Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.), 4(1), 400-408 (2023)
- Authors:
- Ceasar, Rachel Carmen(4), Gould, Erin, Stal, Julia, Laughter, Jen, Tran, Michelle, Wang, Shirlene D, Granacki, Jordan, Ziltzer, Ryan S, Santos, Jasmeen Joy
- Database ID:
- RTHC-04453
Evidence Hierarchy
Uses interviews or focus groups to understand experiences in depth.
What do these levels mean? →Frequently Asked Questions
Why don't prenatal providers discuss cannabis with patients?
Providers cited fear of damaging therapeutic relationships, lack of formal training (relying on self-education), and uncertainty about the evidence. Some worried that raising the topic could cause patients to disengage from prenatal care.
How does this affect low-income patients?
Providers recognized that avoiding cannabis counseling particularly disadvantages low-income patients in safety-net settings who have fewer alternative sources of medical information and fewer treatment options for symptoms driving cannabis use.
Read More on RethinkTHC
- 420-sober-survival-guide
- CBT-cannabis-recovery
- cannabis-relapse-cycle-pattern
- cold-turkey-vs-taper-quit-weed
- dating-sober-after-quitting-weed
- exercise-quitting-weed-anxiety-brain
- grieving-quitting-weed-loss
- help-someone-quit-weed
- how-to-quit-weed
- how-to-talk-to-teenager-about-weed
- journaling-weed-withdrawal
- kids-friends-smoke-weed-parent-guide
- marijuana-anonymous-SMART-recovery-compare
- meditation-mindfulness-weed-withdrawal
- parent-smokes-weed-kids-hypocrite
- partner-still-smokes-weed
- partner-still-smokes-weed-quitting
- pink-cloud-sobriety-cannabis
- quit-weed-cold-turkey
- quit-weed-or-cut-back-which-is-better
- quit-weed-regret-went-back
- quitting-weed-20s
- quitting-weed-30s
- quitting-weed-after-years
- quitting-weed-during-crisis-divorce-job-loss
- quitting-weed-exercise
- quitting-weed-grief-loss-coping
- quitting-weed-legal-state
- quitting-weed-parent
- quitting-weed-success-stories
- quitting-weed-teenager-young-adult
- quitting-weed-triggers-environment
- relapsed-smoking-weed-what-to-do
- relapsed-weed
- should-i-quit-weed
- sober-music-festival-concert-without-weed
- supplements-weed-withdrawal
- teenager-smoking-weed-parent-guide
- telling-friends-quitting-weed
- weed-relapse-prevention-plan
- weed-relapse-why-it-happens
- weed-ritual-replacement
- weed-ruined-relationships
- weed-social-media-triggers-quit
Cite This Study
https://rethinkthc.com/research/RTHC-04453APA
Ceasar, Rachel Carmen; Gould, Erin; Stal, Julia; Laughter, Jen; Tran, Michelle; Wang, Shirlene D; Granacki, Jordan; Ziltzer, Ryan S; Santos, Jasmeen Joy. (2023). Legislation has Changed But Issues Remain: Provider Perceptions of Caring for People Who Use Cannabis During Pregnancy in Safety Net Health Settings, a Qualitative Pilot Study.. Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.), 4(1), 400-408. https://doi.org/10.1089/whr.2023.0057
MLA
Ceasar, Rachel Carmen, et al. "Legislation has Changed But Issues Remain: Provider Perceptions of Caring for People Who Use Cannabis During Pregnancy in Safety Net Health Settings, a Qualitative Pilot Study.." Women's health reports (New Rochelle, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1089/whr.2023.0057
RethinkTHC
RethinkTHC Research Database. "Legislation has Changed But Issues Remain: Provider Percepti..." RTHC-04453. Retrieved from https://rethinkthc.com/research/ceasar-2023-legislation-has-changed-but
Access the Original Study
Study data sourced from PubMed, a service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.
This study breakdown was produced by the RethinkTHC research team. We analyze and report published research findings without making health recommendations. All interpretations are based solely on the published abstract and study data.