rethinkTHC Search
Menu
Study breakdown

How Colorado tried to protect youth in its legal cannabis market

QualitativeModerate evidence
The takeaway

Five years after Colorado legalized recreational cannabis, no statistically significant increase in youth consumption had been identified, but stakeholders highlighted gaps in advertising restrictions and education funding.

Policymakers, public health officials, and anyone interested in legalization outcomes.

No statistically significant increase in youth consumption after 5 years

What the researchers found

Qualitative interviews with 32 key stakeholders and analysis of 13 government documents revealed five themes: advertising restrictions, education efforts, appropriation of funds for prevention, impact assessment challenges, and evolving messages in prevention campaigns. Stakeholders noted that while advertising restrictions existed pre-implementation, enforcement and funding for youth education were ongoing challenges.

Why it matters

As more jurisdictions legalize cannabis, Colorado serves as the longest-running case study for how youth protection measures play out in practice versus on paper.

The numbers in context

13 government documents analyzed. 32 stakeholders interviewed. 5 themes identified. Pre-implementation phase covered November 2012 through December 2013. Interviews conducted in 2016 and 2017.

How the study worked

Qualitative descriptive methodology using document analysis of 13 government documents from the pre-implementation phase (2012-2013) and 32 semi-structured interviews with regulators and stakeholders conducted in 2016-2017.

What this study cannot tell us

Qualitative study with no quantitative outcome measures. Limited to one state. Stakeholder perspectives may not fully represent youth experiences.

How to read the evidence

Qualitative research with systematic methodology, but limited generalizability.

When this study was published

2019 study examining Colorado data from 2012 to 2017.

The bigger picture

Youth protection is central to the legalization debate. This study provides a real-world look at the gap between what policymakers promised and what regulators experienced on the ground.

Questions still open

  • How effectively are prevention education funds being spent in legal cannabis states? Are advertising restrictions actually reducing youth exposure?

Common questions

Did youth cannabis use increase after Colorado legalized?
At the time of this study (5 years post-legalization), no statistically significant increase in youth consumption had been identified.
What youth protection measures did Colorado implement?
Measures included advertising restrictions, prevention education campaigns, and dedicated funding, though stakeholders noted enforcement and funding gaps.

Read the original research

Cannabis and youth protection in Colorado's commercial adult-use market: A qualitative investigation.

The International journal on drug policy, 74, 116-126

Citation

Subritzky, Todd; Lenton, Simon; Pettigrew, Simone. (2019). Cannabis and youth protection in Colorado's commercial adult-use market: A qualitative investigation.. The International journal on drug policy, 74, 116-126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2019.09.007

Explore the wider topic