College students reported more hits and more negative consequences when using joints or blunts compared to bongs
A 4-weekend ecological momentary assessment study of 88 college students found that using joints, blunts, or vapes was associated with more hits per session and greater odds of negative consequences compared to bong use.
Quick Facts
What This Study Found
Participants reported more hits on days using joints, vapes, blunts, or other modes compared to bong use. Greater odds of negative consequences occurred on days using joints or blunts compared to bongs. Plant cannabis was the most common type and bongs the most common mode.
Key Numbers
88 participants, mean age 20.49. Plant was most endorsed cannabis type. Bongs were most common mode. Multilevel models showed more hits on joint, vape, blunt, and other mode days versus bong days. Greater odds of negative consequences on joint and blunt days versus bong days.
How They Did This
Ecological momentary assessment study over 4 weekends with 88 college students aged 18-25 who endorsed weekly simultaneous alcohol and cannabis use. Cannabis use behavior was assessed during morning prompts including type, mode, number of hits, and consequences.
Why This Research Matters
As cannabis legalization expands and consumption methods diversify, understanding which modes of use are linked to heavier consumption and more negative outcomes can inform harm reduction messaging for young adults.
The Bigger Picture
This is one of few studies using real-time daily assessment to compare how different cannabis consumption modes relate to use intensity and consequences, moving beyond the typical cross-sectional approach.
What This Study Doesn't Tell Us
Small sample of 88 students from one university. All participants used both alcohol and cannabis simultaneously, limiting generalizability. Self-reported data collected the morning after use. Short 4-weekend observation period.
Questions This Raises
- ?Why are joints and blunts associated with more hits and consequences?
- ?Is it the social context, the continuous nature of combustion, or the difficulty of dose-titrating?
- ?Would these patterns hold for cannabis-only users?
Trust & Context
- Key Stat:
- Joints and blunts linked to more hits and more negative consequences than bongs
- Evidence Grade:
- Preliminary: small observational EMA study with a narrow sample of simultaneous alcohol-cannabis users over a short observation period.
- Study Age:
- Published 2026.
- Original Title:
- Measuring cannabis use and cannabis-related consequences among college students who engage in simultaneous alcohol and cannabis use: Associations by type of cannabis product and mode of use on weekend days with cannabis.
- Published In:
- Addictive behaviors, 173, 108534 (2026)
- Authors:
- Shipley, Jennifer L, Chiang, Shou-Chun(2), Linden-Carmichael, Ashley N(5)
- Database ID:
- RTHC-08621
Evidence Hierarchy
Watches what happens naturally without intervening.
What do these levels mean? →Frequently Asked Questions
Does the way you use cannabis affect how much you consume?
This study found college students took more hits when using joints, vapes, or blunts compared to bongs, suggesting the mode of use influences consumption volume.
Are some cannabis consumption methods riskier than others?
Students reported greater odds of negative consequences on days they used joints or blunts compared to bongs, though the reasons for this pattern need further study.
Read More on RethinkTHC
- 420-sober-survival-guide
- CBT-cannabis-recovery
- cannabis-relapse-cycle-pattern
- cold-turkey-vs-taper-quit-weed
- dating-sober-after-quitting-weed
- exercise-quitting-weed-anxiety-brain
- grieving-quitting-weed-loss
- help-someone-quit-weed
- how-to-quit-weed
- how-to-talk-to-teenager-about-weed
- journaling-weed-withdrawal
- kids-friends-smoke-weed-parent-guide
- marijuana-anonymous-SMART-recovery-compare
- meditation-mindfulness-weed-withdrawal
- parent-smokes-weed-kids-hypocrite
- partner-still-smokes-weed
- partner-still-smokes-weed-quitting
- pink-cloud-sobriety-cannabis
- quit-weed-cold-turkey
- quit-weed-or-cut-back-which-is-better
- quit-weed-regret-went-back
- quitting-weed-20s
- quitting-weed-30s
- quitting-weed-after-years
- quitting-weed-during-crisis-divorce-job-loss
- quitting-weed-exercise
- quitting-weed-grief-loss-coping
- quitting-weed-legal-state
- quitting-weed-parent
- quitting-weed-success-stories
- quitting-weed-teenager-young-adult
- quitting-weed-triggers-environment
- relapsed-smoking-weed-what-to-do
- relapsed-weed
- should-i-quit-weed
- sober-music-festival-concert-without-weed
- supplements-weed-withdrawal
- teenager-smoking-weed-parent-guide
- telling-friends-quitting-weed
- weed-relapse-prevention-plan
- weed-relapse-why-it-happens
- weed-ritual-replacement
- weed-ruined-relationships
- weed-social-media-triggers-quit
Cite This Study
https://rethinkthc.com/research/RTHC-08621APA
Shipley, Jennifer L; Chiang, Shou-Chun; Linden-Carmichael, Ashley N. (2026). Measuring cannabis use and cannabis-related consequences among college students who engage in simultaneous alcohol and cannabis use: Associations by type of cannabis product and mode of use on weekend days with cannabis.. Addictive behaviors, 173, 108534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2025.108534
MLA
Shipley, Jennifer L, et al. "Measuring cannabis use and cannabis-related consequences among college students who engage in simultaneous alcohol and cannabis use: Associations by type of cannabis product and mode of use on weekend days with cannabis.." Addictive behaviors, 2026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2025.108534
RethinkTHC
RethinkTHC Research Database. "Measuring cannabis use and cannabis-related consequences amo..." RTHC-08621. Retrieved from https://rethinkthc.com/research/shipley-2026-measuring-cannabis-use-and
Access the Original Study
Study data sourced from PubMed, a service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.
This study breakdown was produced by the RethinkTHC research team. We analyze and report published research findings without making health recommendations. All interpretations are based solely on the published abstract and study data.