rethinkTHC Search
Menu
Study breakdown

A cautionary review of health effects seen in Colorado after cannabis legalization

ReviewModerate evidence
The takeaway

Since legalization in Colorado, health consequences observed include psychosis, suicide, other substance abuse, cognitive impairments, fatal motor vehicle collisions, cardiovascular and pulmonary effects, pediatric exposures, contaminant risks, and hash-oil burn injuries.

States considering legalization, public health officials, and cannabis policy researchers.

Psychosis, suicide, and substance abuse are the most concerning post-legalization effects

What the researchers found

The most concerning effects were psychosis, suicide, and other substance abuse. Cognitive impairments may not be reversible with abstinence. Additional concerns include fatal motor vehicle collisions, cardiovascular and pulmonary damage, pediatric exposures, contaminants (infectious agents, heavy metals, pesticides), and hash-oil burns. "Budtenders" provide medical advice without medical training.

Why it matters

Colorado is a real-world natural experiment in cannabis legalization. This review catalogs the negative health consequences that other states should anticipate and prepare for.

The numbers in context

Multiple categories of harm documented. Cannabis research may benefit seizures, MS spasticity, chemo nausea, chronic pain, cardiovascular outcomes, and sleep disorders.

How the study worked

Narrative review of health and safety effects observed in Colorado emergency departments since cannabis legalization.

What this study cannot tell us

Narrative review from one state. No systematic data collection or pre/post comparison. May overrepresent emergency presentations relative to overall population experience.

How to read the evidence

Moderate: comprehensive narrative review of a unique natural experiment, but lacks systematic methodology.

When this study was published

Published in 2019.

The bigger picture

The review presents a balanced view: acknowledging potential medical benefits while documenting significant real-world harms. The lack of standards for cannabis product composition and federal research restrictions are identified as barriers to progress.

Questions still open

  • How do other legalized states compare to Colorado? Would stricter product regulations reduce these harms? Can "budtender" advice be regulated or replaced with trained professionals?

Common questions

Does the review say legalization was a mistake?
The review does not take a definitive position but urges other states to carefully evaluate the evidence before legalizing. It acknowledges both medical potential and documented harms.
What are "budtenders"?
Dispensary employees who sell cannabis products. The review notes they often provide medical advice without medical training, which can be harmful to patients.

Read the original research

Legalized Cannabis in Colorado Emergency Departments: A Cautionary Review of Negative Health and Safety Effects.

The western journal of emergency medicine, 20(4), 557-572

Citation

Roberts, Brad A. (2019). Legalized Cannabis in Colorado Emergency Departments: A Cautionary Review of Negative Health and Safety Effects.. The western journal of emergency medicine, 20(4), 557-572. https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2019.4.39935

Explore the wider topic