Cannabis Use in Pregnancy Linked to Preterm Birth, Low Birth Weight, and Small Babies Even After Accounting for Tobacco

An updated meta-analysis of over 21 million pregnancies found moderate-certainty evidence that cannabis use during pregnancy increased odds of preterm birth, low birth weight, and small-for-gestational-age babies, even after adjusting for tobacco co-use.

Lo, Jamie O et al.·JAMA pediatrics·2025·Strong EvidenceMeta-Analysis
RTHC-06972Meta AnalysisStrong Evidence2025RETHINKTHC RESEARCH DATABASErethinkthc.com/research

Quick Facts

Study Type
Meta-Analysis
Evidence
Strong Evidence
Sample
Not reported

What This Study Found

Cannabis use in pregnancy was associated with increased odds of low birth weight (OR=1.75), preterm birth (OR=1.52), small for gestational age (OR=1.57), and perinatal mortality (OR=1.29). The evidence certainty for the first three outcomes was upgraded to moderate from low/very low in the prior review. Critically, these associations held after adjusting for co-use of tobacco products.

Key Numbers

51 studies, 21.1 million participants. Low birth weight: OR=1.75 (95% CI: 1.41-2.18, 20 studies). Preterm birth: OR=1.52 (95% CI: 1.26-1.83, 20 studies). Small for gestational age: OR=1.57 (95% CI: 1.36-1.81, 12 studies). Perinatal mortality: OR=1.29 (95% CI: 1.07-1.55, 6 studies, low certainty).

How They Did This

Updated living systematic review and meta-analysis published in JAMA Pediatrics. Added 8 new studies (1.7 million participants) to the prior review for a total of 51 studies (21.1 million participants). Random-effects meta-analyses of adjusted odds ratios. Evidence graded using GRADE approach.

Why This Research Matters

This is one of the largest and most rigorous analyses of cannabis and pregnancy outcomes. The upgrade from low to moderate certainty evidence, combined with the enormous sample size, substantially strengthens the case that prenatal cannabis use carries real risks to newborns.

The Bigger Picture

As cannabis use during pregnancy increases and perceived risk decreases, this upgraded evidence provides clinicians with stronger data for patient counseling. The fact that associations persist after tobacco adjustment addresses a major prior criticism.

What This Study Doesn't Tell Us

Observational studies cannot fully eliminate confounding. Cannabis exposure is mostly self-reported. Different studies measured exposure at different points in pregnancy. Dose-response data is limited.

Questions This Raises

  • ?Is there a dose threshold below which prenatal cannabis is safe?
  • ?Do different consumption methods (smoking vs edibles) carry different risks?
  • ?Are there critical windows during pregnancy when exposure is most harmful?

Trust & Context

Key Stat:
Cannabis in pregnancy: 75% higher odds of low birth weight, 52% higher odds of preterm birth
Evidence Grade:
Strong: updated JAMA Pediatrics meta-analysis of 51 studies with 21 million participants, GRADE moderate certainty for primary outcomes, and adjustment for tobacco co-use.
Study Age:
2025 study with literature through April 2024.
Original Title:
Prenatal Cannabis Use and Neonatal Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Published In:
JAMA pediatrics, 179(7), 738-46 (2025)
Database ID:
RTHC-06972

Evidence Hierarchy

Meta-Analysis / Systematic ReviewCombines many studies into one answer
This study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Cohort / Case-Control
Cross-Sectional / Observational
Case Report / Animal Study

Combines results from multiple studies to find an overall pattern.

What do these levels mean? →

Frequently Asked Questions

Could tobacco use explain these findings instead of cannabis?

No. The meta-analysis specifically used studies that adjusted for tobacco co-use, and the associations with cannabis remained significant. This addresses a major prior criticism of earlier evidence.

How strong is this evidence compared to previous reviews?

The evidence was upgraded from low/very low certainty to moderate certainty in this update, reflecting both more studies and more consistent findings. This is published in JAMA Pediatrics, a top-tier journal.

Read More on RethinkTHC

Cite This Study

RTHC-06972·https://rethinkthc.com/research/RTHC-06972

APA

Lo, Jamie O; Ayers, Chelsea K; Yeddala, Snehapriya; Shaw, Beth; Robalino, Shannon; Ward, Rachel; Kansagara, Devan. (2025). Prenatal Cannabis Use and Neonatal Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.. JAMA pediatrics, 179(7), 738-46. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2025.0689

MLA

Lo, Jamie O, et al. "Prenatal Cannabis Use and Neonatal Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.." JAMA pediatrics, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2025.0689

RethinkTHC

RethinkTHC Research Database. "Prenatal Cannabis Use and Neonatal Outcomes: A Systematic Re..." RTHC-06972. Retrieved from https://rethinkthc.com/research/lo-2025-prenatal-cannabis-use-and

Access the Original Study

Study data sourced from PubMed, a service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

This study breakdown was produced by the RethinkTHC research team. We analyze and report published research findings without making health recommendations. All interpretations are based solely on the published abstract and study data.