Cannabis Use Linked to Lower Heart Attack Risk in UK Biobank, Similar to Red Wine

In a large UK cohort, marijuana use was associated with a 15.6% reduction in heart attack incidence, comparable to the protective effect seen with red wine.

Lehrer, Steven et al.·Cureus·2022·Moderate EvidenceRetrospective Cohort
RTHC-03998Retrospective CohortModerate Evidence2022RETHINKTHC RESEARCH DATABASErethinkthc.com/research

Quick Facts

Study Type
Retrospective Cohort
Evidence
Moderate Evidence
Sample
Not reported

What This Study Found

Multivariate logistic regression found marijuana use associated with reduced MI risk (OR 0.844), comparable to red wine consumption (OR 0.847). The analysis controlled for cigarette pack-years, diabetes, sex, BMI, hypertension, and age.

Key Numbers

Marijuana use OR 0.844 for MI; red wine OR 0.847 for MI; MI incidence decreased with marijuana use (P<0.001)

How They Did This

Retrospective analysis of UK Biobank data examining myocardial infarction incidence by marijuana use status, with red wine consumption as a comparator. Multivariate logistic regression controlled for standard cardiovascular risk factors.

Why This Research Matters

Previous evidence on cannabis and heart attack risk has been mixed. Finding a protective association comparable to red wine in a large cohort challenges the assumption that cannabis only poses cardiovascular harm.

The Bigger Picture

The 2017 National Academy of Sciences report found only limited evidence linking acute cannabis use to MI risk. This large cohort adds data suggesting the relationship may actually be protective, though the mechanism is unclear.

What This Study Doesn't Tell Us

Observational study cannot prove causation. Self-reported marijuana use. Could not control for all potential confounders. The "stress reduction" hypothesis for the mechanism is speculative.

Questions This Raises

  • ?Is the apparent protective effect due to stress reduction, anti-inflammatory properties, or unmeasured confounders?
  • ?Would the association hold in populations with different baseline cardiovascular risk?

Trust & Context

Key Stat:
OR 0.844 for MI with marijuana use
Evidence Grade:
Large UK Biobank cohort with multivariate controls, but observational design and self-reported use limit causal conclusions.
Study Age:
Published in 2022
Original Title:
Marijuana and Myocardial Infarction in the UK Biobank Cohort.
Published In:
Cureus, 14(2), e22054 (2022)
Database ID:
RTHC-03998

Evidence Hierarchy

Meta-Analysis / Systematic Review
Randomized Controlled Trial
Cohort / Case-ControlFollows or compares groups over time
This study
Cross-Sectional / Observational
Case Report / Animal Study

Looks back at existing records to find patterns.

What do these levels mean? →

Frequently Asked Questions

Does marijuana protect against heart attacks?

This observational study found an association between marijuana use and lower MI incidence (OR 0.844), but it cannot prove marijuana caused the reduction. The researchers speculated stress reduction might play a role.

How did marijuana compare to red wine for heart protection?

The protective associations were nearly identical: marijuana OR 0.844 versus red wine OR 0.847 for heart attack risk.

Read More on RethinkTHC

Cite This Study

RTHC-03998·https://rethinkthc.com/research/RTHC-03998

APA

Lehrer, Steven; Rheinstein, Peter H. (2022). Marijuana and Myocardial Infarction in the UK Biobank Cohort.. Cureus, 14(2), e22054. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.22054

MLA

Lehrer, Steven, et al. "Marijuana and Myocardial Infarction in the UK Biobank Cohort.." Cureus, 2022. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.22054

RethinkTHC

RethinkTHC Research Database. "Marijuana and Myocardial Infarction in the UK Biobank Cohort..." RTHC-03998. Retrieved from https://rethinkthc.com/research/lehrer-2022-marijuana-and-myocardial-infarction

Access the Original Study

Study data sourced from PubMed, a service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

This study breakdown was produced by the RethinkTHC research team. We analyze and report published research findings without making health recommendations. All interpretations are based solely on the published abstract and study data.