rethinkTHC Search
Menu
Study breakdown

Online school program slowed substance use uptake in Australian teens but had limited effect on cannabis use

Clinical TrialStrong evidence
The takeaway

A three-session online harm reduction program called The Illicit Project slowed increases in binge drinking, nicotine, MDMA, cocaine, and prescription drug misuse among Australian high schoolers, but showed limited effects on cannabis use specifically.

School administrators and public health professionals designing substance use prevention programs; researchers studying harm reduction in adolescents.

67% reduction in binge drinking uptake; no effect on cannabis

What the researchers found

The intervention group showed significantly slower increases in binge drinking (OR 0.33), cocaine use (OR 0.06), and prescription drug misuse (OR 0.07) over 12 months compared to controls. Cannabis use showed no significant intervention effect. Drug literacy and harm reduction help-seeking skills remained higher in the intervention group.

Why it matters

School-based substance use programs often show weak effects. This online, neuroscience-based approach demonstrated meaningful reductions across multiple substances in a rigorous trial design, though the lack of cannabis-specific effects is notable.

The numbers in context

950 students across 8 schools. 63% completed 12-month follow-up. Binge drinking OR 0.33 (95% CI 0.12-0.89). Cocaine use OR 0.06 (95% CI 0.01-0.64). Prescription drug misuse OR 0.07 (95% CI 0.01-0.54). Cannabis use: no significant effect (P > 0.5).

How the study worked

Two-arm cluster-randomized controlled trial across 8 secondary schools in New South Wales, Australia. 950 students (mean age 15.9) were assigned to the intervention (5 schools, n=681) or active control (3 schools, n=269). Follow-up at 6 and 12 months.

What this study cannot tell us

Unequal cluster sizes (5 vs 3 schools). 37% attrition at 12 months. Self-reported outcomes. Australian context may not generalize to other countries. Active control received standard health education, not no intervention.

How to read the evidence

Cluster-RCT with active control and 12-month follow-up, though attrition and unequal clusters introduce some uncertainty.

When this study was published

2024 study

The bigger picture

Online harm reduction education may be more effective than traditional approaches for most substances, but cannabis use among teens appears resistant to this type of intervention, suggesting different drivers or cultural factors may be at play.

Questions still open

  • Why did the program work for other substances but not cannabis? Would a cannabis-specific module improve effectiveness?

Common questions

What was The Illicit Project?
A three-session online program using neuroscience-based content to teach students about how drugs affect the brain, with the goal of reducing harm rather than demanding abstinence.
Why did it not work for cannabis?
The study did not identify a specific reason. Cannabis use may be driven by different social or psychological factors that a general harm reduction program does not adequately address.

Read the original research

An on-line school-based substance use harm reduction programme: The Illicit Project randomized controlled trial results.

Addiction (Abingdon, England), 119(4), 741-752

Citation

Debenham, Jennifer; Birrell, Louise; Champion, Katrina E; Newton, Nicola. (2024). An on-line school-based substance use harm reduction programme: The Illicit Project randomized controlled trial results.. Addiction (Abingdon, England), 119(4), 741-752. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.16403

Explore the wider topic