Online school program slowed substance use uptake in Australian teens but had limited effect on cannabis use
A three-session online harm reduction program called The Illicit Project slowed increases in binge drinking, nicotine, MDMA, cocaine, and prescription drug misuse among Australian high schoolers, but showed limited effects on cannabis use specifically.
Quick Facts
What This Study Found
The intervention group showed significantly slower increases in binge drinking (OR 0.33), cocaine use (OR 0.06), and prescription drug misuse (OR 0.07) over 12 months compared to controls. Cannabis use showed no significant intervention effect. Drug literacy and harm reduction help-seeking skills remained higher in the intervention group.
Key Numbers
950 students across 8 schools. 63% completed 12-month follow-up. Binge drinking OR 0.33 (95% CI 0.12-0.89). Cocaine use OR 0.06 (95% CI 0.01-0.64). Prescription drug misuse OR 0.07 (95% CI 0.01-0.54). Cannabis use: no significant effect (P > 0.5).
How They Did This
Two-arm cluster-randomized controlled trial across 8 secondary schools in New South Wales, Australia. 950 students (mean age 15.9) were assigned to the intervention (5 schools, n=681) or active control (3 schools, n=269). Follow-up at 6 and 12 months.
Why This Research Matters
School-based substance use programs often show weak effects. This online, neuroscience-based approach demonstrated meaningful reductions across multiple substances in a rigorous trial design, though the lack of cannabis-specific effects is notable.
The Bigger Picture
Online harm reduction education may be more effective than traditional approaches for most substances, but cannabis use among teens appears resistant to this type of intervention, suggesting different drivers or cultural factors may be at play.
What This Study Doesn't Tell Us
Unequal cluster sizes (5 vs 3 schools). 37% attrition at 12 months. Self-reported outcomes. Australian context may not generalize to other countries. Active control received standard health education, not no intervention.
Questions This Raises
- ?Why did the program work for other substances but not cannabis?
- ?Would a cannabis-specific module improve effectiveness?
Trust & Context
- Key Stat:
- 67% reduction in binge drinking uptake; no effect on cannabis
- Evidence Grade:
- Cluster-RCT with active control and 12-month follow-up, though attrition and unequal clusters introduce some uncertainty.
- Study Age:
- 2024 study
- Original Title:
- An on-line school-based substance use harm reduction programme: The Illicit Project randomized controlled trial results.
- Published In:
- Addiction (Abingdon, England), 119(4), 741-752 (2024)
- Authors:
- Debenham, Jennifer(5), Birrell, Louise(4), Champion, Katrina E(6), Newton, Nicola
- Database ID:
- RTHC-05259
Evidence Hierarchy
Frequently Asked Questions
What was The Illicit Project?
A three-session online program using neuroscience-based content to teach students about how drugs affect the brain, with the goal of reducing harm rather than demanding abstinence.
Why did it not work for cannabis?
The study did not identify a specific reason. Cannabis use may be driven by different social or psychological factors that a general harm reduction program does not adequately address.
Read More on RethinkTHC
- 420-sober-survival-guide
- CBT-cannabis-recovery
- cannabis-relapse-cycle-pattern
- cold-turkey-vs-taper-quit-weed
- dating-sober-after-quitting-weed
- exercise-quitting-weed-anxiety-brain
- grieving-quitting-weed-loss
- help-someone-quit-weed
- how-to-quit-weed
- how-to-talk-to-teenager-about-weed
- journaling-weed-withdrawal
- kids-friends-smoke-weed-parent-guide
- marijuana-anonymous-SMART-recovery-compare
- meditation-mindfulness-weed-withdrawal
- parent-smokes-weed-kids-hypocrite
- partner-still-smokes-weed
- partner-still-smokes-weed-quitting
- pink-cloud-sobriety-cannabis
- quit-weed-cold-turkey
- quit-weed-or-cut-back-which-is-better
- quit-weed-regret-went-back
- quitting-weed-20s
- quitting-weed-30s
- quitting-weed-after-years
- quitting-weed-during-crisis-divorce-job-loss
- quitting-weed-exercise
- quitting-weed-grief-loss-coping
- quitting-weed-legal-state
- quitting-weed-parent
- quitting-weed-success-stories
- quitting-weed-teenager-young-adult
- quitting-weed-triggers-environment
- relapsed-smoking-weed-what-to-do
- relapsed-weed
- should-i-quit-weed
- sober-music-festival-concert-without-weed
- supplements-weed-withdrawal
- teenager-smoking-weed-parent-guide
- telling-friends-quitting-weed
- weed-relapse-prevention-plan
- weed-relapse-why-it-happens
- weed-ritual-replacement
- weed-ruined-relationships
- weed-social-media-triggers-quit
Cite This Study
https://rethinkthc.com/research/RTHC-05259APA
Debenham, Jennifer; Birrell, Louise; Champion, Katrina E; Newton, Nicola. (2024). An on-line school-based substance use harm reduction programme: The Illicit Project randomized controlled trial results.. Addiction (Abingdon, England), 119(4), 741-752. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.16403
MLA
Debenham, Jennifer, et al. "An on-line school-based substance use harm reduction programme: The Illicit Project randomized controlled trial results.." Addiction (Abingdon, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.16403
RethinkTHC
RethinkTHC Research Database. "An on-line school-based substance use harm reduction program..." RTHC-05259. Retrieved from https://rethinkthc.com/research/debenham-2024-an-online-schoolbased-substance
Access the Original Study
Study data sourced from PubMed, a service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.
This study breakdown was produced by the RethinkTHC research team. We analyze and report published research findings without making health recommendations. All interpretations are based solely on the published abstract and study data.