Cannabis Dispensaries Were More Likely Located in Neighborhoods With Higher Black and Hispanic Populations
A national analysis found cannabis dispensaries were disproportionately located in census tracts with higher percentages of Black residents, Hispanic residents, and people living below the poverty line.
Quick Facts
What This Study Found
Census tracts with the highest percentage of Black residents had 2.07 times the odds of having a dispensary compared to those with the lowest. Similar patterns emerged for Hispanic/Latine residents and poverty levels. In contrast, areas with the most homeowner-occupied housing had only 0.21 times the odds of having a dispensary. These patterns held across all 18 states analyzed.
Key Numbers
3,167 dispensaries across 18 states. Highest vs lowest Black population quintile: OR=2.07 (95% CI: 1.70-2.52). Highest vs lowest homeownership quintile: OR=0.21 (95% CI: 0.17-0.26). Similar patterns for Hispanic/Latine population and poverty levels.
How They Did This
National analysis using dispensary locations from Weedmaps (November 2021, N=3,167) merged with US Census sociodemographic data for 18 states with legal recreational cannabis. Census tracts were categorized into quintiles, and generalized linear mixed models examined associations with dispensary presence.
Why This Research Matters
Cannabis legalization was partly intended to address racial disparities from prohibition. This finding that dispensaries cluster in minority and low-income neighborhoods raises questions about whether the commercial cannabis market is replicating rather than correcting existing inequities.
The Bigger Picture
This mirrors patterns seen with alcohol outlets and tobacco retailers, which are also disproportionately located in minority and low-income neighborhoods. As cannabis retail expands, these disparities could contribute to unequal health outcomes across communities.
What This Study Doesn't Tell Us
Weedmaps may not capture all dispensaries. Cross-sectional November 2021 snapshot may not reflect current distribution. Census tract-level analysis cannot capture within-tract variation. Does not measure whether dispensary proximity affects use patterns.
Questions This Raises
- ?Are local zoning laws driving dispensary placement toward minority neighborhoods?
- ?Does dispensary proximity increase problematic use in these communities?
- ?Should cannabis licensing include equity considerations for dispensary placement?
Trust & Context
- Key Stat:
- Neighborhoods with the most Black residents had 2.07x odds of having a dispensary; highest homeownership areas had 0.21x odds
- Evidence Grade:
- Moderate: national dataset with 18 states and robust statistical modeling, though cross-sectional and limited by Weedmaps data completeness.
- Study Age:
- 2025 study using November 2021 data.
- Original Title:
- Neighborhood Sociodemographic Correlates of Cannabis Dispensary Availability in States with Legalized Adult Recreational Use, United States, 2021.
- Published In:
- Cannabis and cannabinoid research, 10(6), 739-745 (2025)
- Authors:
- Lowery, Bryce C(2), Swayne, Madison R E, Kong, Amanda Y(5)
- Database ID:
- RTHC-06989
Evidence Hierarchy
A snapshot of a population at one point in time.
What do these levels mean? →Frequently Asked Questions
Why are dispensaries more common in minority neighborhoods?
The study did not determine causation but suggests zoning laws, commercial real estate patterns, and lower community opposition in some areas may contribute. The pattern mirrors alcohol and tobacco retail disparities.
Does having a dispensary nearby increase cannabis use?
This study did not measure use patterns, only dispensary location. Previous research suggests availability can influence use, but the relationship is complex and varies by community.
Read More on RethinkTHC
- 420-sober-survival-guide
- CBT-cannabis-recovery
- cannabis-relapse-cycle-pattern
- cold-turkey-vs-taper-quit-weed
- dating-sober-after-quitting-weed
- exercise-quitting-weed-anxiety-brain
- grieving-quitting-weed-loss
- help-someone-quit-weed
- how-to-quit-weed
- journaling-weed-withdrawal
- marijuana-anonymous-SMART-recovery-compare
- meditation-mindfulness-weed-withdrawal
- partner-still-smokes-weed
- partner-still-smokes-weed-quitting
- pink-cloud-sobriety-cannabis
- quit-weed-cold-turkey
- quit-weed-or-cut-back-which-is-better
- quit-weed-regret-went-back
- quitting-weed-20s
- quitting-weed-30s
- quitting-weed-after-years
- quitting-weed-during-crisis-divorce-job-loss
- quitting-weed-exercise
- quitting-weed-grief-loss-coping
- quitting-weed-legal-state
- quitting-weed-success-stories
- quitting-weed-triggers-environment
- relapsed-smoking-weed-what-to-do
- relapsed-weed
- should-i-quit-weed
- sober-music-festival-concert-without-weed
- supplements-weed-withdrawal
- telling-friends-quitting-weed
- weed-relapse-prevention-plan
- weed-relapse-why-it-happens
- weed-ritual-replacement
- weed-ruined-relationships
- weed-social-media-triggers-quit
Cite This Study
https://rethinkthc.com/research/RTHC-06989APA
Lowery, Bryce C; Swayne, Madison R E; Kong, Amanda Y. (2025). Neighborhood Sociodemographic Correlates of Cannabis Dispensary Availability in States with Legalized Adult Recreational Use, United States, 2021.. Cannabis and cannabinoid research, 10(6), 739-745. https://doi.org/10.1089/can.2024.0065
MLA
Lowery, Bryce C, et al. "Neighborhood Sociodemographic Correlates of Cannabis Dispensary Availability in States with Legalized Adult Recreational Use, United States, 2021.." Cannabis and cannabinoid research, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1089/can.2024.0065
RethinkTHC
RethinkTHC Research Database. "Neighborhood Sociodemographic Correlates of Cannabis Dispens..." RTHC-06989. Retrieved from https://rethinkthc.com/research/lowery-2025-neighborhood-sociodemographic-correlates-of
Access the Original Study
Study data sourced from PubMed, a service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.
This study breakdown was produced by the RethinkTHC research team. We analyze and report published research findings without making health recommendations. All interpretations are based solely on the published abstract and study data.