rethinkTHC Search
Menu
Study breakdown

Researchers propose 28 indicators to track whether cannabis legalization helps or hurts public health in Canada

ReviewModerate evidence
The takeaway

A comprehensive framework of 28 public health indicators across five themes was developed to evaluate Canada's cannabis regulation, with early data from other jurisdictions showing mixed results but some potential benefits.

Public health officials, policymakers, and researchers evaluating cannabis legalization outcomes.

28 indicators across 5 themes

What the researchers found

Twenty-eight indicators were identified under five themes: public safety, cannabis use trends, other substance use trends, cardiovascular/respiratory health, and mental health/cognition. Early data from US jurisdictions showed little consensus on harms but emerging evidence for benefits like reduced opioid use.

Why it matters

Canada's legalization is a natural experiment. Without agreed-upon metrics to track outcomes, it would be impossible to know whether the policy is working or where adjustments are needed.

The numbers in context

28 indicators identified across 5 broad themes. Preliminary data from legalized US jurisdictions referenced for each indicator where available.

How the study worked

Systematic search of five scientific databases to compile cannabis-related public health and safety indicators, supplemented with preliminary evidence from US states and Canadian provinces that had already legalized.

What this study cannot tell us

Framework is proposed rather than validated. Preliminary evidence from other jurisdictions may not translate to Canada. Many indicators lack reliable baseline data.

How to read the evidence

Moderate: systematic development of evaluation framework with preliminary supporting evidence.

When this study was published

Published in 2019.

The bigger picture

Most public discourse about cannabis legalization focuses on potential harms. This framework explicitly includes indicators for potential benefits, pushing back against one-sided evaluation of drug policy.

Questions still open

  • Which of the 28 indicators show the most meaningful changes after legalization? Are the proposed metrics sensitive enough to detect real-world policy effects?

Common questions

What are the five themes used to evaluate legalization?
Public safety, cannabis use trends, other substance use trends, cardiovascular and respiratory health, and mental health and cognition.
Does early evidence show legalization is harmful?
Early data from US jurisdictions showed little consensus on harms, with some evidence pointing to potential benefits like reduced opioid use and overdose.

Read the original research

Guidelines for public health and safety metrics to evaluate the potential harms and benefits of cannabis regulation in Canada.

Drug and alcohol review, 38(6), 606-621

Citation

Lake, Stephanie; Kerr, Thomas; Werb, Dan; Haines-Saah, Rebecca; Fischer, Benedikt; Thomas, Gerald; Walsh, Zach; Ware, Mark A; Wood, Evan; Milloy, M-J. (2019). Guidelines for public health and safety metrics to evaluate the potential harms and benefits of cannabis regulation in Canada.. Drug and alcohol review, 38(6), 606-621. https://doi.org/10.1111/dar.12971

Explore the wider topic