At least 27 jurisdictions allow some form of home cannabis cultivation, creating potential for community supply models

A review of cannabis home cultivation policies across 27+ jurisdictions found wide variation in plant limits and sharing rules, and argues these policies could serve as the basis for community-level cannabis supply models that engage existing networks.

Belackova, Vendula et al.·The International journal on drug policy·2019·Moderate EvidenceReview
RTHC-01937ReviewModerate Evidence2019RETHINKTHC RESEARCH DATABASErethinkthc.com/research

Quick Facts

Study Type
Review
Evidence
Moderate Evidence
Sample
Not reported

What This Study Found

At least 27 jurisdictions have adopted non-prohibitive approaches to home cannabis cultivation, ranging from full legalization to de facto depenalization. Key policy limitations include possession thresholds for harvested product, rules about sharing, and disproportionate sanctions for violations. The authors argue home cultivation policies could be expanded into community-level supply models.

Key Numbers

27+ jurisdictions with non-prohibitive home cultivation. 12 jurisdictions fully legalized (including 3 US states with home-grow only). 8 jurisdictions decriminalized. Others depenalized through law or court rulings. Countries span from Uruguay to South Africa to Canada.

How They Did This

Policy review of laws and regulations pertaining to home cannabis cultivation in states and countries that have legalized, decriminalized, or applied other non-prohibitive approaches.

Why This Research Matters

Home cultivation is often overlooked in cannabis policy debates that focus on commercial markets. But it represents an alternative supply model that could engage existing cannabis communities, reduce black market reliance, and give users more control over product quality.

The Bigger Picture

As cannabis legalization spreads globally, the commercial market model dominates policy discussion. Home and community cultivation offers an alternative that is more inclusive, particularly for communities that were disproportionately affected by prohibition.

What This Study Doesn't Tell Us

Policy review without empirical data on outcomes. The feasibility of community supply models is theoretical. Regulatory details change rapidly. Some jurisdictions listed may have since changed their policies.

Questions This Raises

  • ?Can community cultivation models actually reduce black market activity?
  • ?How do plant limits affect whether home growing is practically viable?
  • ?Do home cultivation policies affect commercial market dynamics?

Trust & Context

Key Stat:
27+ jurisdictions allow home growing
Evidence Grade:
Rated moderate because this is a thorough policy review covering multiple jurisdictions, though it does not include empirical outcome data.
Study Age:
Published in 2019. Cannabis policies in many jurisdictions have continued to evolve since.
Original Title:
Overview of "home" cultivation policies and the case for community-based cannabis supply.
Published In:
The International journal on drug policy, 71, 36-46 (2019)
Database ID:
RTHC-01937

Evidence Hierarchy

Meta-Analysis / Systematic Review
Randomized Controlled Trial
Cohort / Case-Control
Cross-Sectional / ObservationalSnapshot without intervening
This study
Case Report / Animal Study

Summarizes existing research on a topic.

What do these levels mean? →

Frequently Asked Questions

Where is home cannabis cultivation legal?

As of this review, at least 27 jurisdictions had some form of non-prohibitive approach, including full legalization in multiple US states, Canada, and Uruguay, plus decriminalization in Belgium, the Netherlands, Czech Republic, and others.

What are community supply models?

The authors propose expanding home cultivation rules to accommodate pooled growing and sharing within communities, creating legitimate, local alternatives to commercial markets.

What limits do home growing policies typically have?

Common restrictions include maximum number of plants (per person and per property), possession limits for harvested product, and rules about whether sharing or distributing to others is allowed.

Read More on RethinkTHC

Cite This Study

RTHC-01937·https://rethinkthc.com/research/RTHC-01937

APA

Belackova, Vendula; Roubalova Stefunkova, Michaela; van de Ven, Katinka. (2019). Overview of "home" cultivation policies and the case for community-based cannabis supply.. The International journal on drug policy, 71, 36-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2019.05.021

MLA

Belackova, Vendula, et al. "Overview of "home" cultivation policies and the case for community-based cannabis supply.." The International journal on drug policy, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2019.05.021

RethinkTHC

RethinkTHC Research Database. "Overview of "home" cultivation policies and the case for com..." RTHC-01937. Retrieved from https://rethinkthc.com/research/belackova-2019-overview-of-home-cultivation

Access the Original Study

Study data sourced from PubMed, a service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

This study breakdown was produced by the RethinkTHC research team. We analyze and report published research findings without making health recommendations. All interpretations are based solely on the published abstract and study data.