Largest fMRI study found no reward processing differences between cannabis users and non-users
In the largest brain imaging study of reward processing and cannabis use to date (125 participants), cannabis users showed no differences from controls in reward anticipation or core reward regions during feedback.
Quick Facts
What This Study Found
Cannabis users and controls had similar neural responses during reward anticipation and in reward-related brain regions during feedback. No User-Group or User-Group by Age-Group effects were found. Bayesian analysis supported these null findings. Adolescents showed no increased vulnerability compared to adults.
Key Numbers
125 participants total (adults 26-29 and adolescents 16-17). Cannabis users consumed 1-7 days per week. No differences in bilateral ventral striatum during anticipation. No differences in right ventral striatum or left vmPFC during feedback. Exploratory whole-brain analysis found greater fronto-parietal activity in users during feedback.
How They Did This
Part of the CannTeen study. 125 adult (26-29 years) and adolescent (16-17 years) cannabis users (1-7 days/week) and matched controls underwent fMRI during the Monetary Incentive Delay task. Region of interest analyses of ventral striatum and ventromedial prefrontal cortex, plus whole-brain analyses.
Why This Research Matters
The widespread belief that cannabis "hijacks" the brain's reward system is not supported by this large, well-designed study. The null findings, backed by Bayesian analysis, suggest reward processing may be largely intact in regular cannabis users.
The Bigger Picture
This challenges the "amotivation syndrome" narrative often applied to cannabis users. If the core reward system is functioning normally, the assumption that cannabis fundamentally alters motivation at a neural level may need reassessment.
What This Study Doesn't Tell Us
Cross-sectional design cannot rule out pre-existing differences. The Monetary Incentive Delay task measures monetary reward, which may not capture all dimensions of motivation. Cannabis users were regular but not necessarily heavy users.
Questions This Raises
- ?Would heavier cannabis users show reward processing differences?
- ?Does the greater fronto-parietal activity during feedback have functional significance?
- ?Would longitudinal data reveal changes that cross-sectional data miss?
Trust & Context
- Key Stat:
- No reward processing differences in adolescent or adult cannabis users
- Evidence Grade:
- Moderate: largest study of its kind with Bayesian support for null findings, but cross-sectional design.
- Study Age:
- Published in 2022.
- Original Title:
- Neural responses to reward anticipation and feedback in adult and adolescent cannabis users and controls.
- Published In:
- Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 47(11), 1976-1983 (2022)
- Authors:
- Skumlien, Martine(4), Mokrysz, Claire(11), Freeman, Tom P(51), Wall, Matthew B, Bloomfield, Michael, Lees, Rachel, Borissova, Anna, Petrilli, Kat, Carson, James, Coughlan, Tiernan, Ofori, Shelan, Langley, Christelle, Sahakian, Barbara J, Curran, H Valerie, Lawn, Will
- Database ID:
- RTHC-04232
Evidence Hierarchy
A snapshot of a population at one point in time.
What do these levels mean? →Frequently Asked Questions
Does this mean cannabis has no effect on the brain's reward system?
In this study, regular cannabis users showed normal reward anticipation and feedback responses in core reward regions. However, the whole-brain analysis found some differences in frontal and parietal areas during feedback, the significance of which is unclear.
Were adolescents more vulnerable?
No. Contrary to expectations, adolescent cannabis users showed no increased vulnerability to reward processing changes compared to adult users.
What is the CannTeen study?
CannTeen is a large research project comparing the effects of cannabis in adolescents and adults across multiple cognitive and neural measures.
Read More on RethinkTHC
- THC-amygdala-anxiety-brain
- anandamide-weed-withdrawal
- cannabinoid-receptors-recovery-time
- cannabis-developing-brain-teenagers
- cant-enjoy-anything-without-weed
- dopamine-recovery-after-quitting-weed
- endocannabinoid-system-explained-simply
- endocannabinoid-system-withdrawal
- nervous-system-weed-withdrawal-fight-flight
- teen-weed-use-under-18-effects-brain
- thc-brain-withdrawal
- thc-prefrontal-cortex-brain-effects
- weed-cortisol-stress-hormones
- weed-memory-loss-recovery
- weed-motivation-amotivational-syndrome
- weed-nervous-system-effects
- weed-reward-system-brain
- cannabis-effects-and-experience-science
- why-more-creative-when-high-thc-divergent
- thc-and-discipline-daily-use-willpower
- thc-creative-work-artists-musicians-writers
Cite This Study
https://rethinkthc.com/research/RTHC-04232APA
Skumlien, Martine; Mokrysz, Claire; Freeman, Tom P; Wall, Matthew B; Bloomfield, Michael; Lees, Rachel; Borissova, Anna; Petrilli, Kat; Carson, James; Coughlan, Tiernan; Ofori, Shelan; Langley, Christelle; Sahakian, Barbara J; Curran, H Valerie; Lawn, Will. (2022). Neural responses to reward anticipation and feedback in adult and adolescent cannabis users and controls.. Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 47(11), 1976-1983. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41386-022-01316-2
MLA
Skumlien, Martine, et al. "Neural responses to reward anticipation and feedback in adult and adolescent cannabis users and controls.." Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41386-022-01316-2
RethinkTHC
RethinkTHC Research Database. "Neural responses to reward anticipation and feedback in adul..." RTHC-04232. Retrieved from https://rethinkthc.com/research/skumlien-2022-neural-responses-to-reward
Access the Original Study
Study data sourced from PubMed, a service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.
This study breakdown was produced by the RethinkTHC research team. We analyze and report published research findings without making health recommendations. All interpretations are based solely on the published abstract and study data.