A Single THC Dose in Newborn Rats Caused Memory Problems in Females But Not Males

A single THC injection during the neonatal period caused spatial memory deficits and altered brain cell structure in female rats — but left males unaffected, revealing a stark sex difference.

Wadhwa, Meetu et al.·Cannabis and cannabinoid research·2026·Preliminary EvidenceAnimal StudyAnimal Study·1 min read
RTHC-08694Animal StudyPreliminary Evidence2026RETHINKTHC RESEARCH DATABASErethinkthc.com/research

Quick Facts

Study Type
Animal Study
Evidence
Preliminary Evidence
Sample
Male and female Sprague Dawley rat pups received THC or vehicle at postnatal day 3.
Participants
Male and female Sprague Dawley rat pups received THC or vehicle at postnatal day 3.

What This Study Found

Rat pups received a single injection of THC (5 mg/kg) or vehicle at postnatal day 3 — a period corresponding to late pregnancy/early postnatal brain development in humans. Weeks later, as young adults (postnatal weeks 6–8), they were tested on behavior and their brains were examined.

The sex difference was dramatic. Female rats exposed to that single neonatal THC dose showed significant spatial memory deficits on the Barnes maze — they were worse at learning and remembering the location of an escape hole. Male rats showed no memory impairment.

Anxiety-like behavior, measured in the open field and elevated plus maze, was not significantly affected in either sex.

Golgi-Cox staining of brain tissue revealed structural changes at the cellular level: THC-exposed animals showed alterations in dendritic morphology and spine density in the frontal cortex and hippocampus — the brain regions most critical for spatial memory and higher cognition. These structural changes provide a biological mechanism for the behavioral findings.

Key Numbers

Single dose: 5 mg/kg THC at postnatal day 3. Female rats: spatial memory deficit on Barnes maze. Male rats: no memory deficit. Neither sex: anxiety changes. Dendritic morphology and spine density alterations in frontal cortex and hippocampus (both sexes structurally affected, but only females showed behavioral consequence).

How They Did This

Male and female Sprague-Dawley rat pups received a single IP injection of THC (5 mg/kg) or vehicle (sesame oil) at postnatal day 3. Behavioral testing at postnatal weeks 6–8: Barnes maze (spatial memory), open field (anxiety), elevated plus maze (anxiety). Golgi-Cox staining for dendritic morphology and spine density in frontal cortex and hippocampus.

Why This Research Matters

This study is remarkable for two reasons: first, a single dose of THC was sufficient to produce lasting cognitive effects; second, only females were affected. This sex-specific vulnerability suggests that the developing female brain may be more sensitive to endocannabinoid system disruption — a finding with implications for prenatal cannabis exposure, since THC crosses the placenta.

The Bigger Picture

The sex difference here echoes the prenatal THC mouse MRI study (RTHC-00236), which also found females more affected. The BDNF study (RTHC-00284) provides a potential molecular mechanism — if BDNF changes are also sex-specific, they could explain why females are more vulnerable. The human ABCD data (RTHC-00241, RTHC-00285) can be re-examined for sex differences in prenatal exposure effects. Together, these studies build a consistent picture of female-specific vulnerability to early cannabinoid exposure.

What This Study Doesn't Tell Us

Single dose at a single timepoint — doesn't model chronic exposure. Neonatal injection is a different route than prenatal placental transfer. Rat brain development timing doesn't perfectly map to human development. Only one THC dose tested. The mechanism connecting structural changes (both sexes) to behavioral effects (females only) needs further investigation.

Questions This Raises

  • ?What makes the female brain more vulnerable to neonatal THC exposure?
  • ?Would multiple doses produce effects in males as well?
  • ?Does the sex difference in behavioral outcome despite structural changes in both sexes mean females lack a compensatory mechanism that males have?

Trust & Context

Key Stat:
Evidence Grade:
Controlled animal study with behavioral and structural brain outcome measures — strong for demonstrating the sex difference but translation to human neonatal exposure requires caution.
Study Age:
Published in 2026, contributing to the growing evidence that female brains may be more vulnerable to early cannabinoid exposure.
Original Title:
Sexually Dimorphic Effects of a Single Neonatal Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol Exposure on Neuronal Dendritic Morphology and Cognitive Functions in Rats.
Published In:
Cannabis and cannabinoid research, 11(1), 36-48 (2026)Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research is a peer-reviewed journal focusing on the science of cannabis and cannabinoids.
Database ID:
RTHC-08694

Evidence Hierarchy

Meta-Analysis / Systematic Review
Randomized Controlled Trial
Cohort / Case-Control
Cross-Sectional / Observational
Case Report / Animal StudyOne case or non-human subjects
This study

Tests effects in animals (usually mice or rats), not humans.

What do these levels mean? →

Read More on RethinkTHC

Cite This Study

RTHC-08694·https://rethinkthc.com/research/RTHC-08694

APA

Wadhwa, Meetu; Chinn, Gregory A; Duong, Katrina; Sasaki Russell, Jennifer; Hellman, Judith; Sall, Jeffrey W. (2026). Sexually Dimorphic Effects of a Single Neonatal Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol Exposure on Neuronal Dendritic Morphology and Cognitive Functions in Rats.. Cannabis and cannabinoid research, 11(1), 36-48. https://doi.org/10.1177/25785125251387835

MLA

Wadhwa, Meetu, et al. "Sexually Dimorphic Effects of a Single Neonatal Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol Exposure on Neuronal Dendritic Morphology and Cognitive Functions in Rats.." Cannabis and cannabinoid research, 2026. https://doi.org/10.1177/25785125251387835

RethinkTHC

RethinkTHC Research Database. "Sexually Dimorphic Effects of a Single Neonatal Δ9-tetrahydr..." RTHC-08694. Retrieved from https://rethinkthc.com/research/wadhwa-2026-sexually-dimorphic-effects-of

Access the Original Study

Study data sourced from PubMed, a service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

This study breakdown was produced by the RethinkTHC research team. We analyze and report published research findings without making health recommendations. All interpretations are based solely on the published abstract and study data.