Topical THC and CBD balms were well tolerated for joint pain in breast cancer survivors on aromatase inhibitors
A randomized trial of 21 breast cancer survivors found topical cannabis balms well tolerated for aromatase inhibitor-related joint pain, with 86% reporting improvement and THC balm showing a higher rate of substantial improvement (50% vs 18%) than CBD balm.
Quick Facts
What This Study Found
86% of participants reported improvement in hand-related symptoms from baseline to week 2. A higher percentage of THC balm users reported over 50% improvement compared to CBD balm users (50% vs 18%). Compliance was high, with 71% continuing an additional 2 weeks. Minor skin irritation occurred in 24%, and only one discontinuation was for cosmetic reasons ("greasy" texture). Nearly half of participants had never used cannabis before.
Key Numbers
21 women; mean age 54; 86% White; 48% no prior cannabis use; 43% received adjuvant chemo; 86% reported improvement; THC >50% improvement: 50% vs CBD 18%; 71% continued extension; 86% survey completion; 24% minor skin irritation; 1 discontinuation
How They Did This
Randomized open-label trial comparing topical CBD versus THC balms applied three times daily to hands for 2 weeks, with 2-week extension using balm of choice. 21 women with stage 1-3 breast cancer experiencing aromatase inhibitor-associated musculoskeletal syndrome (AIMSS). Used state-approved cannabis dispensaries.
Why This Research Matters
Nearly two-thirds of women on aromatase inhibitors experience joint pain and stiffness, leading many to stop a life-saving cancer medication. If topical cannabis can reduce these side effects, it could improve adherence to breast cancer treatment.
The Bigger Picture
Topical cannabis avoids the systemic effects and stigma concerns that may limit oral cannabis use in cancer patients. This approach targets local inflammation directly, which is particularly relevant for a condition that causes patients to stop beneficial cancer treatment.
What This Study Doesn't Tell Us
Small sample (21 women). Open-label, no placebo control. 2-week primary period is short. Cannot determine if improvements are due to cannabis or placebo/natural fluctuation. Topical THC absorption and potential systemic effects were not measured.
Questions This Raises
- ?Would a placebo-controlled trial confirm the THC balm advantage?
- ?Do topical cannabinoids produce detectable systemic levels?
- ?Could topical cannabis be used for joint pain from other causes?
- ?Would longer-term use maintain benefits?
Trust & Context
- Key Stat:
- 86% of participants reported improvement; THC balm: 50% vs CBD: 18% with >50% improvement
- Evidence Grade:
- Preliminary: small randomized trial without placebo control or blinding. Primarily a feasibility study with encouraging signals.
- Study Age:
- 2026 publication from a randomized trial using state-approved cannabis dispensaries.
- Original Title:
- A Randomized, Open-Label Trial to Assess Feasibility and Tolerability of Topical Cannabis Balms for the Treatment of Aromatase Inhibitor-Associated Musculoskeletal Syndrome (AIMSS).
- Published In:
- Cannabis and cannabinoid research, 11(1), 30-35 (2026)
- Authors:
- Zylla, Dylan(3), Idossa, Dame, Borrero, Maria, Napurski, Char, Dahmer, Stephen, Cowger, Jordan, Gilmore, Grace, Luo, Xianghua, Birnbaum, Angela, Blaes, Anne H
- Database ID:
- RTHC-08748
Evidence Hierarchy
Participants are randomly assigned to treatment or placebo groups to test cause and effect.
What do these levels mean? →Frequently Asked Questions
Can topical cannabis help with joint pain from breast cancer treatment?
This small trial found that 86% of breast cancer survivors reported improvement in hand pain and stiffness after 2 weeks of topical cannabis balm. THC balm appeared more effective than CBD balm, but a placebo-controlled trial is needed.
Is topical cannabis safe for cancer patients?
In this trial, both THC and CBD balms were well tolerated. Minor skin irritation occurred in 24% of users. No serious adverse events were reported, and nearly half of participants had never used cannabis before.
Read More on RethinkTHC
- CBD-oil-quality-guide
- anxiety-medication-after-quitting-weed
- cannabis-chemotherapy-nausea
- cannabis-chronic-pain-research
- cannabis-epilepsy-CBD-Epidiolex
- cbd-anxiety-research-evidence
- cbd-for-weed-withdrawal
- cbd-vs-thc-difference
- medical-benefits-of-cannabis
- quitting-weed-before-surgery
- quitting-weed-medication-interactions
- quitting-weed-pregnancy
- quitting-weed-pregnant
- seniors-older-adults-cannabis-risks-medications
- weed-breastfeeding-THC-breast-milk
Cite This Study
https://rethinkthc.com/research/RTHC-08748APA
Zylla, Dylan; Idossa, Dame; Borrero, Maria; Napurski, Char; Dahmer, Stephen; Cowger, Jordan; Gilmore, Grace; Luo, Xianghua; Birnbaum, Angela; Blaes, Anne H. (2026). A Randomized, Open-Label Trial to Assess Feasibility and Tolerability of Topical Cannabis Balms for the Treatment of Aromatase Inhibitor-Associated Musculoskeletal Syndrome (AIMSS).. Cannabis and cannabinoid research, 11(1), 30-35. https://doi.org/10.1177/25785125251398286
MLA
Zylla, Dylan, et al. "A Randomized, Open-Label Trial to Assess Feasibility and Tolerability of Topical Cannabis Balms for the Treatment of Aromatase Inhibitor-Associated Musculoskeletal Syndrome (AIMSS).." Cannabis and cannabinoid research, 2026. https://doi.org/10.1177/25785125251398286
RethinkTHC
RethinkTHC Research Database. "A Randomized, Open-Label Trial to Assess Feasibility and Tol..." RTHC-08748. Retrieved from https://rethinkthc.com/research/zylla-2026-a-randomized-openlabel-trial
Access the Original Study
Study data sourced from PubMed, a service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.
This study breakdown was produced by the RethinkTHC research team. We analyze and report published research findings without making health recommendations. All interpretations are based solely on the published abstract and study data.