THC and Endocannabinoid-Boosting Drugs Reduced Brain Reward Signaling in Mice
THC and drugs that boost the endocannabinoid 2-AG reduced self-stimulation of the brain's reward system in mice, while boosting anandamide alone had little effect.
Quick Facts
What This Study Found
Researchers tested how THC and drugs that increase natural brain cannabinoids affected the brain's reward system in mice using intracranial self-stimulation (ICSS), where animals press a lever to electrically stimulate the medial forebrain bundle.
THC and JZL184 (a MAGL inhibitor that boosts 2-AG) both reduced operant responding for brain stimulation, food, and spontaneous movement. The FAAH inhibitor PF-3845 (which boosts anandamide) had little effect.
The dual FAAH-MAGL inhibitor SA-57, which boosts both anandamide and 2-AG, produced ICSS depression similar in magnitude to THC. All effects were blocked by the CB1 receptor antagonist rimonabant but not by a CB2 antagonist.
Key Numbers
THC and JZL184 attenuated ICSS, food responding, and locomotion. PF-3845 had minimal effects. SA-57 depression was similar in magnitude to THC. JZL184 elevated brain 2-AG. SA-57 elevated both anandamide and 2-AG. CB1 antagonist rimonabant blocked all effects.
How They Did This
Male mice underwent intracranial self-stimulation testing, operant responding for food, and locomotor activity measurements. THC, JZL184, PF-3845, and SA-57 were tested at multiple doses. Brain endocannabinoid levels were quantified. CB1 and CB2 antagonists were used to determine receptor involvement.
Why This Research Matters
The finding that THC and 2-AG boosting reduce brain reward signaling, rather than enhance it, helps explain why THC's reinforcing effects have been difficult to detect in rodent models. It also clarifies that the two main endocannabinoids (anandamide and 2-AG) have different effects on reward circuits.
The Bigger Picture
This research complicates the simple narrative that cannabinoids activate the reward system like other drugs of abuse. Instead, THC and endocannabinoid elevation appear to suppress reward-seeking behavior in this paradigm, which may help explain why cannabis has a lower addictive potential than some other substances.
What This Study Doesn't Tell Us
ICSS is one model of reward but does not capture all aspects of drug reinforcement. Mice were tested acutely, and chronic effects may differ. The doses used may not reflect typical human cannabis exposure patterns. Rodent reward neurobiology does not perfectly map to human experience.
Questions This Raises
- ?Why does THC reduce brain reward stimulation rather than enhance it?
- ?Would chronic exposure to MAGL inhibitors change their effects on the reward system?
Trust & Context
- Key Stat:
- THC reduced brain reward self-stimulation rather than enhancing it
- Evidence Grade:
- This is an animal study using operant behavior paradigms in mice. It provides mechanistic insights about cannabinoid effects on reward circuits that require interpretation for human relevance.
- Study Age:
- Published in 2015. Understanding of endocannabinoid roles in reward and motivation has continued to develop.
- Original Title:
- Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol and endocannabinoid degradative enzyme inhibitors attenuate intracranial self-stimulation in mice.
- Published In:
- The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics, 352(2), 195-207 (2015)
- Authors:
- Wiebelhaus, Jason M(3), Grim, Travis W(2), Owens, Robert A(3), Lazenka, Matthew F, Sim-Selley, Laura J, Abdullah, Rehab A, Niphakis, Micah J, Vann, Robert E, Cravatt, Benjamin F, Wiley, Jenny L, Negus, S Stevens, Lichtman, Aron H
- Database ID:
- RTHC-01078
Evidence Hierarchy
Tests effects in animals (usually mice or rats), not humans.
What do these levels mean? →Frequently Asked Questions
If THC reduces reward signaling, why do people use cannabis recreationally?
The ICSS paradigm measures one specific type of reward response. Human cannabis use involves complex experiences including altered perception, relaxation, and social context that are not captured by lever-pressing for brain stimulation in mice.
What is the difference between anandamide and 2-AG?
Both are endocannabinoids, the brain's own cannabis-like molecules, but they are produced and broken down by different enzymes and appear to have different functional roles. This study found that boosting 2-AG mimicked THC's effects while boosting anandamide alone did not.
Read More on RethinkTHC
- THC-amygdala-anxiety-brain
- anandamide-weed-withdrawal
- cannabinoid-receptors-recovery-time
- cannabis-developing-brain-teenagers
- cant-enjoy-anything-without-weed
- dopamine-recovery-after-quitting-weed
- endocannabinoid-system-explained-simply
- endocannabinoid-system-withdrawal
- nervous-system-weed-withdrawal-fight-flight
- teen-weed-use-under-18-effects-brain
- thc-brain-withdrawal
- thc-prefrontal-cortex-brain-effects
- weed-cortisol-stress-hormones
- weed-memory-loss-recovery
- weed-motivation-amotivational-syndrome
- weed-nervous-system-effects
- weed-reward-system-brain
Cite This Study
https://rethinkthc.com/research/RTHC-01078APA
Wiebelhaus, Jason M; Grim, Travis W; Owens, Robert A; Lazenka, Matthew F; Sim-Selley, Laura J; Abdullah, Rehab A; Niphakis, Micah J; Vann, Robert E; Cravatt, Benjamin F; Wiley, Jenny L; Negus, S Stevens; Lichtman, Aron H. (2015). Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol and endocannabinoid degradative enzyme inhibitors attenuate intracranial self-stimulation in mice.. The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics, 352(2), 195-207. https://doi.org/10.1124/jpet.114.218677
MLA
Wiebelhaus, Jason M, et al. "Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol and endocannabinoid degradative enzyme inhibitors attenuate intracranial self-stimulation in mice.." The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1124/jpet.114.218677
RethinkTHC
RethinkTHC Research Database. "Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol and endocannabinoid degradative enzy..." RTHC-01078. Retrieved from https://rethinkthc.com/research/wiebelhaus-2015-9tetrahydrocannabinol-and-endocannabinoid-degradative
Access the Original Study
Study data sourced from PubMed, a service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.
This study breakdown was produced by the RethinkTHC research team. We analyze and report published research findings without making health recommendations. All interpretations are based solely on the published abstract and study data.