How Genetics and Environment (Including Cannabis) Combine to Influence Psychosis Risk

Genetic risk and environmental exposures like cannabis use appear to contribute independently to psychosis, with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders driven more by genetics and affective psychosis shaped more by environmental factors.

Rodriguez, Victoria et al.·Schizophrenia bulletin·2025·Moderate EvidenceCase-Control
RTHC-07514Case ControlModerate Evidence2025RETHINKTHC RESEARCH DATABASErethinkthc.com/research

Quick Facts

Study Type
Case-Control
Evidence
Moderate Evidence
Sample
Not reported

What This Study Found

In 573 first-episode psychosis cases and 1,005 controls, polygenic risk for schizophrenia was the strongest genetic predictor of schizophrenia-spectrum disorders, with a notably larger effect in people not exposed to strong environmental risks like frequent cannabis use (OR 2.43 unexposed vs 1.35 exposed). For affective psychosis, genetic risk for depression appeared stronger among those exposed to environmental risk factors. No statistical interaction was found between genetic and environmental risk scores.

Key Numbers

573 first-episode psychosis cases, 1,005 controls. Schizophrenia-spectrum PRS-SZ effect: OR 2.43 (cannabis-unexposed) vs 1.35 (cannabis-exposed). Environmental factors examined: migration, paternal age, childhood adversity, frequent cannabis use.

How They Did This

Case-control study analyzing 573 first-episode psychosis patients and 1,005 controls of European ancestry from the EUGEI study. Polygenic risk scores were calculated for schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and depression. Environmental measures included migration, paternal age, childhood adversity, and frequent cannabis use. Regression models tested gene-environment interactions.

Why This Research Matters

Understanding how genes and environment combine in psychosis risk is critical for prevention. The finding that genetic and environmental risks appear to act independently (rather than multiplying each other) has implications for how risk is assessed and communicated.

The Bigger Picture

This study supports a liability threshold model where genetic and environmental risks accumulate independently. For schizophrenia-spectrum disorders, high genetic risk alone may be sufficient, while cannabis use and other environmental factors add risk additively. For affective psychosis, the environmental contribution appears relatively larger.

What This Study Doesn't Tell Us

European ancestry only; findings may not generalize. Cross-sectional design limits causal inference. Environmental exposures measured retrospectively. Cannabis use assessed as binary (frequent vs not), missing dose-response nuance. PRS explains only a fraction of genetic risk.

Questions This Raises

  • ?Why does genetic risk appear to have a larger effect in people not exposed to cannabis?
  • ?Would these patterns replicate in non-European populations?
  • ?Could individual genetic profiles predict who is most vulnerable to cannabis-related psychosis risk?

Trust & Context

Key Stat:
Genetic risk effect: OR 2.43 without cannabis vs 1.35 with cannabis
Evidence Grade:
Moderate: large, well-designed case-control study with polygenic risk scoring, but cross-sectional and limited to European ancestry.
Study Age:
Published in 2025.
Original Title:
Polygenic and Polyenvironment Interplay in Schizophrenia-Spectrum Disorder and Affective Psychosis; the EUGEI First Episode Study.
Published In:
Schizophrenia bulletin, 51(5), 1254-1265 (2025)
Database ID:
RTHC-07514

Evidence Hierarchy

Meta-Analysis / Systematic Review
Randomized Controlled Trial
Cohort / Case-ControlFollows or compares groups over time
This study
Cross-Sectional / Observational
Case Report / Animal Study

Compares people with a condition to similar people without it.

What do these levels mean? →

Frequently Asked Questions

Does cannabis use interact with genetic risk for psychosis?

This study found genetic and environmental risks (including cannabis) appear to contribute independently rather than multiplying each other. Interestingly, genetic risk had a larger effect among those NOT exposed to frequent cannabis use.

Is schizophrenia more genetic or environmental?

This study suggests schizophrenia-spectrum disorders are more strongly associated with genetic factors, while affective psychosis appears to involve a larger environmental contribution, with both types showing additive (not multiplicative) gene-environment effects.

Read More on RethinkTHC

Cite This Study

RTHC-07514·https://rethinkthc.com/research/RTHC-07514

APA

Rodriguez, Victoria; Alameda, Luis; Aas, Monica; Gayer-Anderson, Charlotte; Trotta, Giulia; Spinazzola, Edoardo; Quattrone, Diego; Tripoli, Giada; Jongsma, Hannah E; Stilo, Simona; La Cascia, Caterina; Ferraro, Laura; La Barbera, Daniele; Lasalvia, Antonio; Tosato, Sarah; Tarricone, Ilaria; Bonora, Elena; Jamain, Stéphane; Selten, Jean-Paul; Velthorst, Eva; de Haan, Lieuwe; Llorca, Pierre-Michel; Arrojo, Manuel; Bobes, Julio; Bernardo, Miguel; Arango, Celso; Kirkbride, James; Jones, Peter B; Rutten, Bart P; Richards, Alexander; Sham, Pak C; O'Donovan, Michael; Van Os, Jim; Morgan, Craig; Di Forti, Marta; Murray, Robin M; Vassos, Evangelos. (2025). Polygenic and Polyenvironment Interplay in Schizophrenia-Spectrum Disorder and Affective Psychosis; the EUGEI First Episode Study.. Schizophrenia bulletin, 51(5), 1254-1265. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbae207

MLA

Rodriguez, Victoria, et al. "Polygenic and Polyenvironment Interplay in Schizophrenia-Spectrum Disorder and Affective Psychosis; the EUGEI First Episode Study.." Schizophrenia bulletin, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbae207

RethinkTHC

RethinkTHC Research Database. "Polygenic and Polyenvironment Interplay in Schizophrenia-Spe..." RTHC-07514. Retrieved from https://rethinkthc.com/research/rodriguez-2025-polygenic-and-polyenvironment-interplay

Access the Original Study

Study data sourced from PubMed, a service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

This study breakdown was produced by the RethinkTHC research team. We analyze and report published research findings without making health recommendations. All interpretations are based solely on the published abstract and study data.