Clinical Assessments Predicted Continued Cannabis Use in Psychosis Patients with 73% Accuracy
A prediction model using clinical interviews correctly identified 73% of recent-onset psychosis patients who would continue using cannabis, with lower functioning, urbanicity, and lack of coping strategies as key predictors.
Quick Facts
What This Study Found
Clinical interview data alone predicted continued cannabis use with 73% accuracy in 109 recent-onset psychosis patients. The model generalized to 73 clinical high-risk patients. Lower functioning, specific substance use patterns, urbanicity, and lack of alternative coping strategies were the strongest predictors.
Key Numbers
109 ROP patients, 73 CHR patients. Clinical assessment accuracy: 73% (p<0.05). Cognitive and MRI data did not significantly improve prediction (ps>0.065). Key predictors: lower functioning, substance use patterns, urbanicity, lack of alternative coping strategies.
How They Did This
Prospective study of 109 recent-onset psychosis (ROP) patients who reported lifetime cannabis use at baseline. Machine learning models tested whether clinical assessments, cognitive tests, and brain MRI could predict cannabis use between baseline and 9-month follow-up. The model was validated in 73 clinical high-risk patients.
Why This Research Matters
Continued cannabis use worsens outcomes in psychosis. If clinicians can identify which patients are most likely to keep using, they can target interventions more effectively. This study shows that standard clinical assessments may be sufficient for this prediction.
The Bigger Picture
The finding that brain scans and cognitive tests added nothing beyond clinical interviews is practically important: it means clinicians do not need expensive neuroimaging to identify at-risk patients. The coping strategies finding also points to a specific intervention target.
What This Study Doesn't Tell Us
Moderate sample size (109 ROP, 73 CHR). "Continued use" was defined as any cannabis use in 9 months, not frequency or quantity. The model needs testing in larger, more diverse populations before clinical implementation.
Questions This Raises
- ?Would targeted coping skills interventions reduce continued cannabis use in the identified high-risk patients?
- ?Does the 73% accuracy hold across different cultural contexts and healthcare settings?
Trust & Context
- Key Stat:
- 73% prediction accuracy from clinical assessment alone
- Evidence Grade:
- Moderate: prospective design with cross-validation and external validation in a second patient group, though moderate sample sizes.
- Study Age:
- Published in 2022.
- Original Title:
- Pattern of predictive features of continued cannabis use in patients with recent-onset psychosis and clinical high-risk for psychosis.
- Published In:
- Schizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany), 8(1), 19 (2022)
- Authors:
- Penzel, Nora(2), Sanfelici, Rachele(2), Antonucci, Linda A(2), Betz, Linda T, Dwyer, Dominic, Ruef, Anne, Cho, Kang Ik K, Cumming, Paul, Pogarell, Oliver, Howes, Oliver, Falkai, Peter, Upthegrove, Rachel, Borgwardt, Stefan, Brambilla, Paolo, Lencer, Rebekka, Meisenzahl, Eva, Schultze-Lutter, Frauke, Rosen, Marlene, Lichtenstein, Theresa, Kambeitz-Ilankovic, Lana, Ruhrmann, Stephan, Salokangas, Raimo K R, Pantelis, Christos, Wood, Stephen J, Quednow, Boris B, Pergola, Giulio, Bertolino, Alessandro, Koutsouleris, Nikolaos, Kambeitz, Joseph
- Database ID:
- RTHC-04136
Evidence Hierarchy
Enrolls participants and follows them forward in time.
What do these levels mean? →Frequently Asked Questions
Can doctors predict which psychosis patients will keep using cannabis?
This study found that standard clinical interviews could predict continued use with 73% accuracy. Key indicators were lower overall functioning, specific substance use patterns, living in urban areas, and lacking alternative coping strategies.
Do brain scans help predict cannabis use in psychosis patients?
No. Adding brain MRI and cognitive testing to clinical assessments did not significantly improve prediction, suggesting standard clinical interviews capture the most relevant information.
Read More on RethinkTHC
- THC-amygdala-anxiety-brain
- anandamide-weed-withdrawal
- cannabinoid-receptors-recovery-time
- cannabis-developing-brain-teenagers
- cant-enjoy-anything-without-weed
- dopamine-recovery-after-quitting-weed
- endocannabinoid-system-explained-simply
- endocannabinoid-system-withdrawal
- nervous-system-weed-withdrawal-fight-flight
- teen-weed-use-under-18-effects-brain
- thc-brain-withdrawal
- thc-prefrontal-cortex-brain-effects
- weed-cortisol-stress-hormones
- weed-memory-loss-recovery
- weed-motivation-amotivational-syndrome
- weed-nervous-system-effects
- weed-reward-system-brain
Cite This Study
https://rethinkthc.com/research/RTHC-04136APA
Penzel, Nora; Sanfelici, Rachele; Antonucci, Linda A; Betz, Linda T; Dwyer, Dominic; Ruef, Anne; Cho, Kang Ik K; Cumming, Paul; Pogarell, Oliver; Howes, Oliver; Falkai, Peter; Upthegrove, Rachel; Borgwardt, Stefan; Brambilla, Paolo; Lencer, Rebekka; Meisenzahl, Eva; Schultze-Lutter, Frauke; Rosen, Marlene; Lichtenstein, Theresa; Kambeitz-Ilankovic, Lana; Ruhrmann, Stephan; Salokangas, Raimo K R; Pantelis, Christos; Wood, Stephen J; Quednow, Boris B; Pergola, Giulio; Bertolino, Alessandro; Koutsouleris, Nikolaos; Kambeitz, Joseph. (2022). Pattern of predictive features of continued cannabis use in patients with recent-onset psychosis and clinical high-risk for psychosis.. Schizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany), 8(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41537-022-00218-y
MLA
Penzel, Nora, et al. "Pattern of predictive features of continued cannabis use in patients with recent-onset psychosis and clinical high-risk for psychosis.." Schizophrenia (Heidelberg, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41537-022-00218-y
RethinkTHC
RethinkTHC Research Database. "Pattern of predictive features of continued cannabis use in ..." RTHC-04136. Retrieved from https://rethinkthc.com/research/penzel-2022-pattern-of-predictive-features
Access the Original Study
Study data sourced from PubMed, a service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.
This study breakdown was produced by the RethinkTHC research team. We analyze and report published research findings without making health recommendations. All interpretations are based solely on the published abstract and study data.