Cannabis and stimulant use drove different psychotic symptom trajectories over 10 years after first-episode psychosis

In a 10-year follow-up of 192 first-episode psychosis patients, four distinct symptom trajectories emerged, with frequent cannabis use in the first five years linked to delayed remission and stimulant use linked to relapse.

Kreis, Isabel et al.·Schizophrenia research·2024·Strong EvidenceObservational
RTHC-05438ObservationalStrong Evidence2024RETHINKTHC RESEARCH DATABASErethinkthc.com/research

Quick Facts

Study Type
Observational
Evidence
Strong Evidence
Sample
N=192

What This Study Found

Four trajectories emerged: Stable Remission (54.2%), Delayed Remission (15.6%), Psychotic Relapse (7.8%), and Persistent Symptoms (22.4%). Delayed Remission was associated with frequent cannabis and stimulant use during the first five years, with dose-dependent effects for cannabis but not stimulants. Psychotic Relapse was associated with sporadic stimulant use throughout the full follow-up period.

Key Numbers

192 participants; 10-year follow-up; 54.2% Stable Remission; 15.6% Delayed Remission; 7.8% Psychotic Relapse; 22.4% Persistent Symptoms; dose-dependent cannabis effect on unfavorable trajectories; all unfavorable trajectories had more schizophrenia diagnoses and longer untreated psychosis

How They Did This

Ten-year follow-up of 192 participants with first-episode psychosis using growth mixture modeling to identify psychotic symptom trajectories. Associations with baseline characteristics and concurrent cannabis/stimulant use during follow-up were tested.

Why This Research Matters

Understanding which substance use patterns drive specific long-term psychosis trajectories can help clinicians prioritize substance use interventions. The dose-dependent cannabis effect suggests even reduction (not just cessation) may improve outcomes.

The Bigger Picture

The finding that cannabis has dose-dependent effects while stimulants show binary effects on psychosis trajectories suggests these substances operate through different mechanisms and may require different intervention approaches.

What This Study Doesn't Tell Us

Observational design cannot prove causation; substance use assessed during follow-up may be a consequence rather than cause of symptoms; 10-year attrition; cannot distinguish cannabis types or potencies; relatively small trajectory subgroups

Questions This Raises

  • ?Would structured cannabis reduction interventions during the first five years of psychosis treatment shift patients from the Delayed Remission to Stable Remission trajectory?
  • ?Why does stimulant use show a different temporal pattern of risk than cannabis?

Trust & Context

Key Stat:
10-year follow-up of 192 first-episode psychosis patients
Evidence Grade:
Long-term prospective cohort with data-driven trajectory analysis, though limited by observational design and modest sample sizes within trajectory groups.
Study Age:
2024 study with 10-year follow-up data
Original Title:
Behind the heterogeneity in the long-term course of first-episode psychosis: Different psychotic symptom trajectories are associated with different patterns of cannabis and stimulant use.
Published In:
Schizophrenia research, 271, 91-99 (2024)
Database ID:
RTHC-05438

Evidence Hierarchy

Meta-Analysis / Systematic Review
Randomized Controlled Trial
Cohort / Case-Control
Cross-Sectional / ObservationalSnapshot without intervening
This study
Case Report / Animal Study

Watches what happens naturally without intervening.

What do these levels mean? →

Frequently Asked Questions

What were the long-term outcomes for first-episode psychosis patients?

Just over half (54.2%) achieved stable remission. About 15.6% eventually remitted but were delayed, 7.8% relapsed after initial improvement, and 22.4% had persistent psychotic symptoms over the 10 years.

How did cannabis and stimulant use affect outcomes differently?

Cannabis had a dose-dependent effect, meaning more frequent use was associated with worse outcomes, particularly delayed remission during the first five years. Stimulant use showed a different pattern: even sporadic use throughout the follow-up period was associated with psychotic relapse. This suggests cannabis reduction (not just cessation) may help, while stimulant avoidance may need to be complete.

Read More on RethinkTHC

Cite This Study

RTHC-05438·https://rethinkthc.com/research/RTHC-05438

APA

Kreis, Isabel; Lagerberg, Trine Vik; Wold, Kristin Fjelnseth; Åsbø, Gina; Simonsen, Carmen; Flaaten, Camilla Bärthel; Engen, Magnus Johan; Lyngstad, Siv Hege; Widing, Line Hustad; Ueland, Torill; Melle, Ingrid. (2024). Behind the heterogeneity in the long-term course of first-episode psychosis: Different psychotic symptom trajectories are associated with different patterns of cannabis and stimulant use.. Schizophrenia research, 271, 91-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2024.07.006

MLA

Kreis, Isabel, et al. "Behind the heterogeneity in the long-term course of first-episode psychosis: Different psychotic symptom trajectories are associated with different patterns of cannabis and stimulant use.." Schizophrenia research, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2024.07.006

RethinkTHC

RethinkTHC Research Database. "Behind the heterogeneity in the long-term course of first-ep..." RTHC-05438. Retrieved from https://rethinkthc.com/research/kreis-2024-behind-the-heterogeneity-in

Access the Original Study

Study data sourced from PubMed, a service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

This study breakdown was produced by the RethinkTHC research team. We analyze and report published research findings without making health recommendations. All interpretations are based solely on the published abstract and study data.