Low-dose cannabis edibles impaired verbal memory but not other cognitive functions in regular users

In a naturalistic lab study, 22 regular cannabis users who consumed their usual edibles (averaging 7.3 mg THC) showed impaired verbal learning and memory but no effects on executive function, visual attention, or trail-making performance, with blood THC levels unrelated to cognitive outcomes.

Di Ciano, Patricia et al.·Psychopharmacology·2025·Preliminary EvidenceObservational
RTHC-06345ObservationalPreliminary Evidence2025RETHINKTHC RESEARCH DATABASErethinkthc.com/research

Quick Facts

Study Type
Observational
Evidence
Preliminary Evidence
Sample
N=22

What This Study Found

At 150 minutes after consuming a cannabis edible averaging 7.3 mg THC, participants showed decreased performance on two verbal free recall measures. No effects were found on the useful field of view test or trail making test. Significant subjective intoxication was reported. Blood THC was not correlated with any cognitive outcomes.

Key Numbers

22 participants. Mean edible THC dose: 7.3 +/- 2.9 mg. Cognitive testing at 150 and 270 minutes. Two verbal free recall measures impaired at 150 minutes. Trail making and useful field of view unaffected. Blood THC did not correlate with any cognitive outcome.

How They Did This

Observational study where 22 participants consumed their own legally sourced cannabis edibles in the lab. Cognitive testing (verbal free recall, trail making, useful field of view) and subjective experience measures were administered at 150 and 270 minutes post-ingestion. Blood THC and metabolites were measured and correlated with cognitive outcomes.

Why This Research Matters

Edible cannabis use is rising rapidly, yet almost all cognitive research has focused on smoked cannabis. This study provides rare data on how edibles at typical consumer doses affect thinking, finding a narrower cognitive impact than typically seen with smoking.

The Bigger Picture

The finding that blood THC levels do not predict cognitive performance with edibles mirrors similar findings with smoked cannabis in older adults. This disconnect may reflect the complex pharmacokinetics of oral THC, including first-pass metabolism producing 11-OH-THC (which is more psychoactive), variable absorption rates, and individual differences in metabolism.

What This Study Doesn't Tell Us

Very small sample (n=22) of regular users who may have tolerance. Naturalistic dosing means no placebo control. Participants knew they were taking cannabis, so expectancy effects cannot be ruled out. The relatively low average dose (7.3 mg) may not reflect all consumer patterns.

Questions This Raises

  • ?Would higher edible doses affect a broader range of cognitive functions?
  • ?Does the cognitive impact differ between smoked and edible cannabis at equivalent THC exposure?
  • ?Why does blood THC fail to predict cognitive effects with oral consumption?

Trust & Context

Key Stat:
Verbal memory impaired but trail-making and visual attention unaffected at 7.3 mg THC edible dose
Evidence Grade:
Small observational study (n=22) with naturalistic dosing and no placebo control, though with objective cognitive and blood measures.
Study Age:
Published in 2025.
Original Title:
Effects of naturalistic doses of cannabis edibles on cognition and association with blood THC.
Published In:
Psychopharmacology (2025)
Database ID:
RTHC-06345

Evidence Hierarchy

Meta-Analysis / Systematic Review
Randomized Controlled Trial
Cohort / Case-Control
Cross-Sectional / ObservationalSnapshot without intervening
This study
Case Report / Animal Study

Watches what happens naturally without intervening.

What do these levels mean? →

Frequently Asked Questions

Are edibles safer for cognition than smoking cannabis?

This study found edibles impaired only verbal memory at typical doses, whereas smoked cannabis studies often show broader effects. However, the low dose (7.3 mg) and experienced user population limit direct comparison.

Why didn't blood THC predict cognitive effects?

When cannabis is eaten, it undergoes first-pass liver metabolism that converts THC into 11-OH-THC, a more psychoactive metabolite. Blood THC alone may not capture the full picture of what is affecting the brain.

Read More on RethinkTHC

Cite This Study

RTHC-06345·https://rethinkthc.com/research/RTHC-06345

APA

Di Ciano, Patricia; Zhao, Sampson; Kaduri, Pamela; Patel, Siddhi; Bhakta, Kruti; Wickens, Christine M; Chen, Sheng; Le Foll, Bernard; Brands, Bruna. (2025). Effects of naturalistic doses of cannabis edibles on cognition and association with blood THC.. Psychopharmacology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-025-06863-2

MLA

Di Ciano, Patricia, et al. "Effects of naturalistic doses of cannabis edibles on cognition and association with blood THC.." Psychopharmacology, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-025-06863-2

RethinkTHC

RethinkTHC Research Database. "Effects of naturalistic doses of cannabis edibles on cogniti..." RTHC-06345. Retrieved from https://rethinkthc.com/research/di-2025-effects-of-naturalistic-doses

Access the Original Study

Study data sourced from PubMed, a service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

This study breakdown was produced by the RethinkTHC research team. We analyze and report published research findings without making health recommendations. All interpretations are based solely on the published abstract and study data.