Neighborhood deprivation and daily cannabis use independently linked to psychosis rates across Europe

Lower homeownership rates and higher prevalence of daily cannabis use each independently contributed to variation in psychosis incidence across 14 European settings.

Brink, Vera et al.·Schizophrenia bulletin·2024·Moderate Evidenceepidemiological
RTHC-05160EpidemiologicalModerate Evidence2024RETHINKTHC RESEARCH DATABASErethinkthc.com/research

Quick Facts

Study Type
epidemiological
Evidence
Moderate Evidence
Sample
Not reported

What This Study Found

Lower owner-occupancy was independently associated with increased first-episode psychosis incidence (aIRR: 0.76) and non-affective psychosis (aIRR: 0.68). Daily cannabis use prevalence was associated with affective psychosis incidence (aIRR: 1.53). High-potency cannabis use was not independently associated with psychosis incidence after adjustment.

Key Numbers

Data from 14 European settings. Lower owner-occupancy aIRR: 0.76 (95% CI: 0.61-0.95) for all FEP. Daily cannabis use aIRR: 1.53 (95% CI: 1.02-2.31) for affective psychosis. No association found with unemployment or high-potency cannabis use prevalence.

How They Did This

Researchers used incidence data from 14 settings in the EU-GEI study for people aged 18-64. Cannabis use prevalence was estimated from population controls with multiple imputation for missing data. Negative binomial regression modeled psychosis incidence while controlling for population density, age, sex, and migrant/ethnic group.

Why This Research Matters

This is one of the first studies to examine both social deprivation and cannabis use simultaneously as predictors of psychosis incidence across multiple settings. The finding that both factors contribute independently suggests neither alone explains the variation in psychosis rates.

The Bigger Picture

The debate about whether cannabis causes psychosis often overlooks the social context in which cannabis use occurs. This study highlights that neighborhood-level poverty and cannabis use patterns are both relevant, and that public health interventions targeting either factor could potentially reduce psychosis burden.

What This Study Doesn't Tell Us

Ecological study design means individual-level conclusions cannot be drawn. Cannabis use prevalence was estimated from controls, not directly measured in the population. Cross-sectional design limits causal inference. Only 14 settings were included.

Questions This Raises

  • ?Why was daily cannabis use associated with affective but not non-affective psychosis?
  • ?Does social deprivation increase cannabis use, increase psychosis risk independently, or both?
  • ?Would similar patterns emerge in non-European settings?

Trust & Context

Key Stat:
53% higher affective psychosis incidence in settings with more daily cannabis use
Evidence Grade:
Multi-site European study with rigorous statistical adjustment, though the ecological design and estimated cannabis prevalence measures limit causal interpretation.
Study Age:
Published in 2024 in Schizophrenia Bulletin using EU-GEI study data.
Original Title:
The Role of Social Deprivation and Cannabis Use in Explaining Variation in the Incidence of Psychotic Disorders: Findings From the EU-GEI Study.
Published In:
Schizophrenia bulletin, 50(5), 1039-1049 (2024)
Database ID:
RTHC-05160

Evidence Hierarchy

Meta-Analysis / Systematic Review
Randomized Controlled Trial
Cohort / Case-Control
Cross-Sectional / ObservationalSnapshot without intervening
This study
Case Report / Animal Study
What do these levels mean? →

Frequently Asked Questions

Does cannabis cause psychosis?

This study found that areas with higher daily cannabis use had higher rates of affective psychosis, but the ecological design means it cannot prove individual-level causation. Social deprivation was also an independent predictor.

Was high-potency cannabis more strongly linked to psychosis?

Surprisingly, high-potency cannabis use prevalence was not independently associated with psychosis incidence after controlling for other factors. Daily frequency of use appeared to matter more than potency at the population level.

Read More on RethinkTHC

Cite This Study

RTHC-05160·https://rethinkthc.com/research/RTHC-05160

APA

Brink, Vera; Andleeb, Humma; Gayer-Anderson, Charlotte; Arango, Celso; Arrojo, Manuel; Berardi, Domenico; Bernardo, Miquel; Bobes, Julio; Del-Ben, Cristina Marta; Ferraro, Laura; de Haan, Lieuwe; La Barbera, Daniele; La Cascia, Caterina; Lasalvia, Antonio; Llorca, Pierre-Michel; Menezes, Paolo Rossi; Pignon, Baptiste; Sanjuán, Julio; Santos, José Luis; Selten, Jean-Paul; Tarricone, Ilaria; Tortelli, Andrea; Tripoli, Giada; Velthorst, Eva; Rutten, Bart P F; van Os, Jim; Quattrone, Diego; Murray, Robin M; Jones, Peter B; Morgan, Craig; Di Forti, Marta; Jongsma, Hannah E; Kirkbride, James B. (2024). The Role of Social Deprivation and Cannabis Use in Explaining Variation in the Incidence of Psychotic Disorders: Findings From the EU-GEI Study.. Schizophrenia bulletin, 50(5), 1039-1049. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbae072

MLA

Brink, Vera, et al. "The Role of Social Deprivation and Cannabis Use in Explaining Variation in the Incidence of Psychotic Disorders: Findings From the EU-GEI Study.." Schizophrenia bulletin, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbae072

RethinkTHC

RethinkTHC Research Database. "The Role of Social Deprivation and Cannabis Use in Explainin..." RTHC-05160. Retrieved from https://rethinkthc.com/research/brink-2024-the-role-of-social

Access the Original Study

Study data sourced from PubMed, a service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

This study breakdown was produced by the RethinkTHC research team. We analyze and report published research findings without making health recommendations. All interpretations are based solely on the published abstract and study data.