Women did better than men in early psychosis treatment, but the gap narrowed after 10 years

Women with first-episode psychosis showed better recovery rates than men during the first 3 years of specialized treatment (50% vs 31%), but after 10 years, the difference was no longer statistically significant, possibly because specialized care had ended.

Ayesa-Arriola, Rosa et al.·NPJ schizophrenia·2020·Moderate EvidenceLongitudinal Cohort
RTHC-02402Longitudinal CohortModerate Evidence2020RETHINKTHC RESEARCH DATABASErethinkthc.com/research

Quick Facts

Study Type
Longitudinal Cohort
Evidence
Moderate Evidence
Sample
N=209

What This Study Found

At first contact, women were older at onset, had higher premorbid adjustment and IQ, were more often employed and living independently. During the first 3 years in specialized early intervention services (EIS), women had higher recovery rates (50% vs 30.8%) and responded better to lower antipsychotic doses. After 10 years (following discharge from EIS to community services), women only maintained an advantage in negative symptoms; recovery rates no longer differed significantly (46.7% vs 34.4%). Antipsychotic doses increased after EIS discharge. Cannabis use remained more common among men at all time points.

Key Numbers

209 patients (95 females, 114 males). 3-year recovery: 50% women vs 30.8% men. 10-year recovery: 46.7% women vs 34.4% men (not significant). Cannabis use more common in men at all time points. Antipsychotic doses increased after EIS discharge.

How They Did This

Longitudinal cohort of 209 first-episode psychosis patients (95 females, 114 males) reassessed 8-16 years after initial contact with the PAFIP early intervention program in Spain.

Why This Research Matters

The narrowing of the sex gap after specialized care ends raises questions about whether longer-duration EIS programs could maintain women's early advantage.

The Bigger Picture

This study suggests that the well-known female advantage in psychosis outcomes may partly reflect the benefit of specialized, lower-dose treatment rather than an inherent biological advantage that persists indefinitely.

What This Study Doesn't Tell Us

Single EIS program. Some attrition over 10 years. Observational design. Cannabis use differences may contribute to sex differences beyond biological factors.

Questions This Raises

  • ?Would longer EIS involvement maintain women's recovery advantage?
  • ?Is the increase in antipsychotic doses after EIS discharge clinically justified or reflects less individualized care?

Trust & Context

Key Stat:
50% vs 31% recovery during specialized care; gap narrowed at 10 years
Evidence Grade:
Long-term longitudinal cohort from a well-established EIS program, though single-site and observational.
Study Age:
2020 study with 8-16 year follow-up.
Original Title:
Understanding sex differences in long-term outcomes after a first episode of psychosis.
Published In:
NPJ schizophrenia, 6(1), 33 (2020)
Database ID:
RTHC-02402

Evidence Hierarchy

Meta-Analysis / Systematic Review
Randomized Controlled Trial
Cohort / Case-ControlFollows or compares groups over time
This study
Cross-Sectional / Observational
Case Report / Animal Study

Follows a group of people over time to track how outcomes develop.

What do these levels mean? →

Frequently Asked Questions

Do women recover from psychosis better than men?

In this study, women had higher recovery rates during the first 3 years of specialized care (50% vs 31%), but after 10 years the difference was no longer significant, possibly because specialized treatment had ended.

Does cannabis affect psychosis outcomes differently by sex?

Cannabis use was more common among men at all time points (first contact, 3 years, and 10 years), which may contribute to their lower recovery rates.

Read More on RethinkTHC

Cite This Study

RTHC-02402·https://rethinkthc.com/research/RTHC-02402

APA

Ayesa-Arriola, Rosa; de la Foz, Víctor Ortíz-García; Setién-Suero, Esther; Ramírez-Bonilla, María Luz; Suárez-Pinilla, Paula; Son, Jacqueline Mayoral-van; Vázquez-Bourgon, Javier; Juncal-Ruiz, María; Gómez-Revuelta, Marcos; Tordesillas-Gutiérrez, Diana; Crespo-Facorro, Benedicto. (2020). Understanding sex differences in long-term outcomes after a first episode of psychosis.. NPJ schizophrenia, 6(1), 33. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41537-020-00120-5

MLA

Ayesa-Arriola, Rosa, et al. "Understanding sex differences in long-term outcomes after a first episode of psychosis.." NPJ schizophrenia, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41537-020-00120-5

RethinkTHC

RethinkTHC Research Database. "Understanding sex differences in long-term outcomes after a ..." RTHC-02402. Retrieved from https://rethinkthc.com/research/ayesa-arriola-2020-understanding-sex-differences-in

Access the Original Study

Study data sourced from PubMed, a service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

This study breakdown was produced by the RethinkTHC research team. We analyze and report published research findings without making health recommendations. All interpretations are based solely on the published abstract and study data.