The prescription synthetic cannabinoid nabilone showed extremely rare abuse potential after nearly 30 years of use

A comprehensive search of scientific literature, internet forums, law enforcement, and medical professionals found extremely rare evidence of nabilone abuse despite being available since 1981.

Ware, Mark A et al.·Addiction (Abingdon·2010·Moderate EvidenceReview
RTHC-00461ReviewModerate Evidence2010RETHINKTHC RESEARCH DATABASErethinkthc.com/research

Quick Facts

Study Type
Review
Evidence
Moderate Evidence
Sample
Not reported

What This Study Found

Researchers conducted a comprehensive evaluation of whether the synthetic cannabinoid nabilone (approved in Canada since 1981 for chemotherapy nausea) was being abused, particularly as off-label pain management prescribing increased.

The scientific literature and popular press contained very little reference to nabilone abuse. Internet searches revealed only rare, isolated instances of recreational use. Law enforcement database review showed some seizures and thefts in Canada (particularly Ontario) but most officers reported no encounters with nabilone abuse. The drug had no known street value.

Several factors limited abuse potential: nabilone produced more undesirable side effects than smoked cannabis, had a slower onset of action, and cost more. Medical professionals did not perceive nabilone as a concern for abuse.

Key Numbers

Nabilone approved in Canada since 1981. Some seizures and thefts documented, primarily in Ontario. No known street value. Law enforcement and medical professionals reported minimal concern.

How They Did This

Multi-source investigation including systematic searches of scientific literature, popular press, and internet databases, plus focused interviews with medical professionals and law enforcement agencies across Canada.

Why This Research Matters

The finding of negligible abuse potential after nearly 30 years of availability was reassuring for clinicians prescribing nabilone for pain management, while still recommending ongoing monitoring.

The Bigger Picture

This evaluation helped distinguish between different cannabinoid formulations in terms of abuse liability, showing that the pharmaceutical properties of a cannabinoid (onset time, side effect profile, cost) strongly influence abuse potential.

What This Study Doesn't Tell Us

Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. Nabilone prescribing was relatively limited in 2010. Under-reporting of abuse is possible. The study predated the expansion of nabilone use for pain.

Questions This Raises

  • ?As nabilone prescribing increases for pain management, will abuse patterns emerge?
  • ?What pharmaceutical properties most effectively reduce the abuse potential of therapeutic cannabinoids?

Trust & Context

Key Stat:
Extremely rare abuse reported after nearly 30 years of availability
Evidence Grade:
Multi-source investigation including literature, internet, law enforcement, and medical professional interviews providing a comprehensive abuse potential assessment.
Study Age:
Published in 2010. Nabilone prescribing patterns have evolved since, and ongoing vigilance was recommended.
Original Title:
The abuse potential of the synthetic cannabinoid nabilone.
Published In:
Addiction (Abingdon, England), 105(3), 494-503 (2010)
Database ID:
RTHC-00461

Evidence Hierarchy

Meta-Analysis / Systematic Review
Randomized Controlled Trial
Cohort / Case-Control
Cross-Sectional / ObservationalSnapshot without intervening
This study
Case Report / Animal Study

Summarizes existing research on a topic.

What do these levels mean? →

Frequently Asked Questions

Can people get addicted to nabilone?

After nearly 30 years of availability, abuse reports were extremely rare. Nabilone's slower onset, more side effects, and higher cost compared to cannabis appeared to limit its appeal for recreational use.

What is nabilone used for?

Nabilone is a synthetic cannabinoid prescription drug approved for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. It has increasingly been used off-label for chronic pain management.

Read More on RethinkTHC

Cite This Study

RTHC-00461·https://rethinkthc.com/research/RTHC-00461

APA

Ware, Mark A; St Arnaud-Trempe, Emmanuelle. (2010). The abuse potential of the synthetic cannabinoid nabilone.. Addiction (Abingdon, England), 105(3), 494-503. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02776.x

MLA

Ware, Mark A, et al. "The abuse potential of the synthetic cannabinoid nabilone.." Addiction (Abingdon, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02776.x

RethinkTHC

RethinkTHC Research Database. "The abuse potential of the synthetic cannabinoid nabilone." RTHC-00461. Retrieved from https://rethinkthc.com/research/ware-2010-the-abuse-potential-of

Access the Original Study

Study data sourced from PubMed, a service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

This study breakdown was produced by the RethinkTHC research team. We analyze and report published research findings without making health recommendations. All interpretations are based solely on the published abstract and study data.