Cannabis Use Disorder Linked to More Complications After Brain Tumor Surgery

Glioblastoma patients with cannabis use disorder had higher rates of complications during hospitalization and more neurologic problems at 6 and 12 months after craniotomy compared to matched controls.

Sreenivasan, Sanjeev et al.·World neurosurgery·2024·Moderate EvidenceRetrospective Cohort
RTHC-05732Retrospective CohortModerate Evidence2024RETHINKTHC RESEARCH DATABASErethinkthc.com/research

Quick Facts

Study Type
Retrospective Cohort
Evidence
Moderate Evidence
Sample
Not reported

What This Study Found

After balancing groups, patients with cannabis abuse disorder (CAD) had higher complication rates during initial hospitalization (32% vs 15%, p=0.001) and higher neurologic complications at 6 months (27% vs 8%, p<0.001) and 12 months (31% vs 12%, p<0.001). CAD patients were significantly younger (median 37 vs 51 years) and had higher rates of opioid abuse (16% vs 5%). At one year, CAD patients sought fewer outpatient services.

Key Numbers

CAD group: median age 37 vs 51 years, 19% women vs 45%. Index stay complications: 32% vs 15%. Opioid abuse: 16% vs 5%. 6-month neurologic complications: 27% vs 8%. 12-month neurologic complications: 31% vs 12%. Fewer outpatient visits at 1 year (p=0.012).

How They Did This

Retrospective population-based study using Merative MarketScan data (2008-2019, >265 million patients). Adults with GBM diagnosis who underwent craniotomy were identified. Inverse probability treatment weighting balanced cannabis abuse disorder and non-CAD groups on age, gender, insurance, comorbidities, and opioid dependence.

Why This Research Matters

Glioblastoma already has a dismal prognosis (14-16 month median survival). Finding that cannabis use disorder is associated with additional complications after surgery, combined with reduced outpatient follow-up, suggests this patient population may need extra monitoring and support.

The Bigger Picture

Some patients use cannabis hoping for anti-tumor effects. This study found the opposite of a protective effect: more complications, more neurologic problems, and less follow-up care. While this does not prove cannabis caused the worse outcomes, it challenges the therapeutic narrative.

What This Study Doesn't Tell Us

Cannabis abuse disorder diagnosis is based on billing codes, which may not accurately capture all cannabis users. The much younger age of CAD patients suggests systematic differences between groups that may not be fully addressed by weighting. Cannot determine if cannabis itself caused complications or if CAD is a marker for other risk factors.

Questions This Raises

  • ?Is the higher complication rate caused by cannabis use itself, or by the behavioral and socioeconomic factors associated with cannabis use disorder?
  • ?Would controlled cannabis use (vs disorder-level use) show different results?
  • ?Why did CAD patients seek fewer outpatient services?

Trust & Context

Key Stat:
32% complication rate vs 15% in non-cannabis group
Evidence Grade:
Large population-based dataset with statistical balancing, but billing-code-based diagnosis and age differences between groups limit causal inference.
Study Age:
2024 study using 2008-2019 data
Original Title:
Cannabis and Craniotomy for Glioblastoma: Impact on Complications and Health Care Utilization.
Published In:
World neurosurgery, 190, e707-e715 (2024)
Database ID:
RTHC-05732

Evidence Hierarchy

Meta-Analysis / Systematic Review
Randomized Controlled Trial
Cohort / Case-ControlFollows or compares groups over time
This study
Cross-Sectional / Observational
Case Report / Animal Study

Looks back at existing records to find patterns.

What do these levels mean? →

Frequently Asked Questions

Does cannabis use affect brain tumor surgery outcomes?

This study found patients with cannabis use disorder had roughly double the complication rate after glioblastoma surgery and significantly more neurologic problems at 6 and 12 months compared to matched controls.

Does cannabis protect against brain tumors?

This study found no evidence of a protective effect. Patients with cannabis use disorder actually had worse outcomes after glioblastoma surgery, though the study cannot prove cannabis caused the worse outcomes.

Read More on RethinkTHC

Cite This Study

RTHC-05732·https://rethinkthc.com/research/RTHC-05732

APA

Sreenivasan, Sanjeev; Kaoutzani, Lydia; Ugiliweneza, Beatrice; Boakye, Maxwell; Schulder, Michael; Sharma, Mayur. (2024). Cannabis and Craniotomy for Glioblastoma: Impact on Complications and Health Care Utilization.. World neurosurgery, 190, e707-e715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2024.07.210

MLA

Sreenivasan, Sanjeev, et al. "Cannabis and Craniotomy for Glioblastoma: Impact on Complications and Health Care Utilization.." World neurosurgery, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2024.07.210

RethinkTHC

RethinkTHC Research Database. "Cannabis and Craniotomy for Glioblastoma: Impact on Complica..." RTHC-05732. Retrieved from https://rethinkthc.com/research/sreenivasan-2024-cannabis-and-craniotomy-for

Access the Original Study

Study data sourced from PubMed, a service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

This study breakdown was produced by the RethinkTHC research team. We analyze and report published research findings without making health recommendations. All interpretations are based solely on the published abstract and study data.