Cannabis Use Disorder Linked to More Complications After Brain Tumor Surgery
Glioblastoma patients with cannabis use disorder had higher rates of complications during hospitalization and more neurologic problems at 6 and 12 months after craniotomy compared to matched controls.
Quick Facts
What This Study Found
After balancing groups, patients with cannabis abuse disorder (CAD) had higher complication rates during initial hospitalization (32% vs 15%, p=0.001) and higher neurologic complications at 6 months (27% vs 8%, p<0.001) and 12 months (31% vs 12%, p<0.001). CAD patients were significantly younger (median 37 vs 51 years) and had higher rates of opioid abuse (16% vs 5%). At one year, CAD patients sought fewer outpatient services.
Key Numbers
CAD group: median age 37 vs 51 years, 19% women vs 45%. Index stay complications: 32% vs 15%. Opioid abuse: 16% vs 5%. 6-month neurologic complications: 27% vs 8%. 12-month neurologic complications: 31% vs 12%. Fewer outpatient visits at 1 year (p=0.012).
How They Did This
Retrospective population-based study using Merative MarketScan data (2008-2019, >265 million patients). Adults with GBM diagnosis who underwent craniotomy were identified. Inverse probability treatment weighting balanced cannabis abuse disorder and non-CAD groups on age, gender, insurance, comorbidities, and opioid dependence.
Why This Research Matters
Glioblastoma already has a dismal prognosis (14-16 month median survival). Finding that cannabis use disorder is associated with additional complications after surgery, combined with reduced outpatient follow-up, suggests this patient population may need extra monitoring and support.
The Bigger Picture
Some patients use cannabis hoping for anti-tumor effects. This study found the opposite of a protective effect: more complications, more neurologic problems, and less follow-up care. While this does not prove cannabis caused the worse outcomes, it challenges the therapeutic narrative.
What This Study Doesn't Tell Us
Cannabis abuse disorder diagnosis is based on billing codes, which may not accurately capture all cannabis users. The much younger age of CAD patients suggests systematic differences between groups that may not be fully addressed by weighting. Cannot determine if cannabis itself caused complications or if CAD is a marker for other risk factors.
Questions This Raises
- ?Is the higher complication rate caused by cannabis use itself, or by the behavioral and socioeconomic factors associated with cannabis use disorder?
- ?Would controlled cannabis use (vs disorder-level use) show different results?
- ?Why did CAD patients seek fewer outpatient services?
Trust & Context
- Key Stat:
- 32% complication rate vs 15% in non-cannabis group
- Evidence Grade:
- Large population-based dataset with statistical balancing, but billing-code-based diagnosis and age differences between groups limit causal inference.
- Study Age:
- 2024 study using 2008-2019 data
- Original Title:
- Cannabis and Craniotomy for Glioblastoma: Impact on Complications and Health Care Utilization.
- Published In:
- World neurosurgery, 190, e707-e715 (2024)
- Authors:
- Sreenivasan, Sanjeev, Kaoutzani, Lydia, Ugiliweneza, Beatrice(2), Boakye, Maxwell, Schulder, Michael, Sharma, Mayur
- Database ID:
- RTHC-05732
Evidence Hierarchy
Looks back at existing records to find patterns.
What do these levels mean? →Frequently Asked Questions
Does cannabis use affect brain tumor surgery outcomes?
This study found patients with cannabis use disorder had roughly double the complication rate after glioblastoma surgery and significantly more neurologic problems at 6 and 12 months compared to matched controls.
Does cannabis protect against brain tumors?
This study found no evidence of a protective effect. Patients with cannabis use disorder actually had worse outcomes after glioblastoma surgery, though the study cannot prove cannabis caused the worse outcomes.
Read More on RethinkTHC
- CBD-oil-quality-guide
- anxiety-medication-after-quitting-weed
- cannabis-chemotherapy-nausea
- cannabis-chronic-pain-research
- cannabis-epilepsy-CBD-Epidiolex
- cbd-anxiety-research-evidence
- cbd-for-weed-withdrawal
- cbd-vs-thc-difference
- medical-benefits-of-cannabis
- quitting-weed-before-surgery
- quitting-weed-medication-interactions
- quitting-weed-pregnancy
- quitting-weed-pregnant
- seniors-older-adults-cannabis-risks-medications
- weed-breastfeeding-THC-breast-milk
Cite This Study
https://rethinkthc.com/research/RTHC-05732APA
Sreenivasan, Sanjeev; Kaoutzani, Lydia; Ugiliweneza, Beatrice; Boakye, Maxwell; Schulder, Michael; Sharma, Mayur. (2024). Cannabis and Craniotomy for Glioblastoma: Impact on Complications and Health Care Utilization.. World neurosurgery, 190, e707-e715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2024.07.210
MLA
Sreenivasan, Sanjeev, et al. "Cannabis and Craniotomy for Glioblastoma: Impact on Complications and Health Care Utilization.." World neurosurgery, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2024.07.210
RethinkTHC
RethinkTHC Research Database. "Cannabis and Craniotomy for Glioblastoma: Impact on Complica..." RTHC-05732. Retrieved from https://rethinkthc.com/research/sreenivasan-2024-cannabis-and-craniotomy-for
Access the Original Study
Study data sourced from PubMed, a service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.
This study breakdown was produced by the RethinkTHC research team. We analyze and report published research findings without making health recommendations. All interpretations are based solely on the published abstract and study data.