Oral THC:CBD capsules tripled the rate of complete response for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in a randomized trial
In a randomized, placebo-controlled trial of 147 cancer patients, oral THC:CBD capsules (2.5mg each, three times daily) improved complete response for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting from 8% to 24% when added to standard antiemetics.
Quick Facts
What This Study Found
THC:CBD improved complete response rate (no vomiting, no rescue medication) from 8% to 24% (absolute difference 16%, 95% CI 4-28, p=0.01) during the first chemotherapy cycle. Similar improvements were seen for absence of significant nausea, reduced rescue medication use, and quality of life. Adverse events included sedation (18% vs 7%), dizziness (10% vs 0%), and transient anxiety (4% vs 1%). No serious adverse events attributed to THC:CBD.
Key Numbers
147 evaluable participants. Complete response: 24% THC:CBD vs 8% placebo (p=0.01). Absolute difference: 16%. Background antiemetics: corticosteroid+5-HT3 antagonist (97%), NK1 antagonist (80%), olanzapine (10%). Sedation: 18% vs 7%. Dizziness: 10% vs 0%.
How They Did This
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, two-stage phase II/III trial. 147 evaluable participants (of planned 250) with refractory nausea/vomiting during moderately or highly emetogenic chemotherapy despite guideline-consistent antiemetics. THC 2.5mg + CBD 2.5mg capsules three times daily, days -1 to 5.
Why This Research Matters
Despite modern antiemetics, many cancer patients still experience nausea and vomiting. This trial demonstrates that low-dose THC:CBD can meaningfully improve outcomes when standard treatments are insufficient, using a product that is standardized and tested rather than ad hoc cannabis use.
The Bigger Picture
This is one of the strongest RCT evidence bases for cannabis in cancer care. The standardized dosing (2.5mg THC + 2.5mg CBD, TID) provides a clear protocol that could be implemented in clinical practice, unlike variable cannabis products.
What This Study Doesn't Tell Us
Enrolled 147 of planned 250 participants. Background antiemetic regimens varied. Additional sedation and dizziness may limit use in some patients. Drug availability, legal status, and cultural attitudes may affect implementation. Cost-effectiveness analysis pending.
Questions This Raises
- ?Would different THC:CBD ratios be more effective or better tolerated?
- ?Could this become standard of care for refractory chemotherapy-induced nausea?
Trust & Context
- Key Stat:
- Complete response tripled: 24% vs 8% (p=0.01)
- Evidence Grade:
- Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with clinically meaningful primary endpoint, though under-enrolled.
- Study Age:
- 2024 study
- Original Title:
- Oral Cannabis Extract for Secondary Prevention of Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: Final Results of a Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Phase II/III Trial.
- Published In:
- Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 42(34), 4040-4050 (2024)
- Authors:
- Grimison, Peter(2), Mersiades, Antony, Kirby, Adrienne, Tognela, Annette, Olver, Ian, Morton, Rachael L, Haber, Paul, Walsh, Anna, Lee, Yvonne, Abdi, Ehtesham, Della-Fiorentina, Stephen, Aghmesheh, Morteza, Fox, Peter, Briscoe, Karen, Sanmugarajah, Jasotha, Marx, Gavin, Kichenadasse, Ganessan, Wheeler, Helen, Chan, Matthew, Shannon, Jenny, Gedye, Craig, Begbie, Stephen, Simes, R John, Stockler, Martin R
- Database ID:
- RTHC-05354
Evidence Hierarchy
Frequently Asked Questions
What dose of cannabis was used?
Patients received capsules containing 2.5 mg THC plus 2.5 mg CBD, taken three times daily from the day before chemotherapy through day 5. This is a low dose compared to recreational cannabis use.
Why were these patients still nauseated despite standard treatment?
The trial enrolled patients whose nausea and vomiting were not adequately controlled by guideline-recommended antiemetics. This "refractory" group is common in oncology, particularly with highly emetogenic chemotherapy regimens.
Read More on RethinkTHC
- CBD-oil-quality-guide
- anxiety-medication-after-quitting-weed
- cannabis-chemotherapy-nausea
- cannabis-chronic-pain-research
- cannabis-epilepsy-CBD-Epidiolex
- cbd-anxiety-research-evidence
- cbd-for-weed-withdrawal
- cbd-vs-thc-difference
- medical-benefits-of-cannabis
- quitting-weed-before-surgery
- quitting-weed-medication-interactions
- quitting-weed-pregnancy
- quitting-weed-pregnant
- seniors-older-adults-cannabis-risks-medications
- weed-breastfeeding-THC-breast-milk
Cite This Study
https://rethinkthc.com/research/RTHC-05354APA
Grimison, Peter; Mersiades, Antony; Kirby, Adrienne; Tognela, Annette; Olver, Ian; Morton, Rachael L; Haber, Paul; Walsh, Anna; Lee, Yvonne; Abdi, Ehtesham; Della-Fiorentina, Stephen; Aghmesheh, Morteza; Fox, Peter; Briscoe, Karen; Sanmugarajah, Jasotha; Marx, Gavin; Kichenadasse, Ganessan; Wheeler, Helen; Chan, Matthew; Shannon, Jenny; Gedye, Craig; Begbie, Stephen; Simes, R John; Stockler, Martin R. (2024). Oral Cannabis Extract for Secondary Prevention of Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: Final Results of a Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Phase II/III Trial.. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 42(34), 4040-4050. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.23.01836
MLA
Grimison, Peter, et al. "Oral Cannabis Extract for Secondary Prevention of Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: Final Results of a Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Phase II/III Trial.." Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.23.01836
RethinkTHC
RethinkTHC Research Database. "Oral Cannabis Extract for Secondary Prevention of Chemothera..." RTHC-05354. Retrieved from https://rethinkthc.com/research/grimison-2024-oral-cannabis-extract-for
Access the Original Study
Study data sourced from PubMed, a service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.
This study breakdown was produced by the RethinkTHC research team. We analyze and report published research findings without making health recommendations. All interpretations are based solely on the published abstract and study data.