CBD Reduced Seizures in Most Children with Drug-Resistant Epilepsy
Among 50 children with drug-resistant epilepsy who took CBD for at least six months, 56% achieved meaningful seizure reduction and 16% became seizure-free.
Quick Facts
What This Study Found
In a retrospective review of 50 children with drug-resistant epilepsy (mostly Lennox-Gastaut syndrome), CBD as add-on therapy produced complete seizure response (>90% reduction) in 10 children, partial response (30-90% reduction) in 18, and no response in 14. Eight children became entirely seizure-free. Adverse effects occurred in 44% but none required hospitalization. Eight children discontinued treatment.
Key Numbers
50 children; mean age 7.8 years; complete response in 10 (20%), partial in 18 (36%), no response in 14 (28%); 8 (16%) seizure-free; adverse effects in 22 (44%); 8 discontinued (4 for lack of efficacy, 3 for adverse effects, 1 for seizure worsening)
How They Did This
Retrospective chart review of children with drug-resistant epilepsy who received CBD for at least six months at a single center. Assessed seizure frequency reduction, parent-reported adverse effects, and discontinuation rates. Epilepsy types included Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (n=32), Dravet syndrome (n=4), and tuberous sclerosis complex (n=2).
Why This Research Matters
Drug-resistant epilepsy leaves families with few options. This real-world data from a clinical setting supports the growing evidence that CBD can meaningfully reduce seizures in children who have not responded to standard treatments.
The Bigger Picture
CBD (as Epidiolex) is already FDA-approved for certain seizure disorders. Studies like this one extend the evidence base to broader clinical practice, showing consistent results outside of controlled trial settings.
What This Study Doesn't Tell Us
Retrospective design without a control group. Single center. Parent-reported outcomes subject to recall bias. No standardized dosing protocol described. Heterogeneous epilepsy types grouped together.
Questions This Raises
- ?Which seizure types respond best to CBD add-on therapy?
- ?Could optimized dosing improve the 28% non-response rate?
Trust & Context
- Key Stat:
- Evidence Grade:
- Moderate: retrospective cohort at a single center with meaningful follow-up period, but no control group.
- Study Age:
- 2025 publication
- Original Title:
- Cannabidiol in Drug-Resistant Epilepsy (DRE) in Children: A Retrospective Study.
- Published In:
- Indian pediatrics, 62(7), 501-505 (2025)
- Database ID:
- RTHC-06573
Evidence Hierarchy
Looks back at existing records to find patterns.
What do these levels mean? →Read More on RethinkTHC
- CBD-oil-quality-guide
- anxiety-medication-after-quitting-weed
- cannabis-chemotherapy-nausea
- cannabis-chronic-pain-research
- cannabis-epilepsy-CBD-Epidiolex
- cbd-anxiety-research-evidence
- cbd-for-weed-withdrawal
- cbd-vs-thc-difference
- medical-benefits-of-cannabis
- quitting-weed-before-surgery
- quitting-weed-medication-interactions
- quitting-weed-pregnancy
- quitting-weed-pregnant
- seniors-older-adults-cannabis-risks-medications
- weed-breastfeeding-THC-breast-milk
Cite This Study
https://rethinkthc.com/research/RTHC-06573APA
Gowda, Vykuntaraju K; Simin, Halima; Kinhal, Uddhava V; Basavaraja, G V; Sanjay, K S. (2025). Cannabidiol in Drug-Resistant Epilepsy (DRE) in Children: A Retrospective Study.. Indian pediatrics, 62(7), 501-505. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13312-025-00075-9
MLA
Gowda, Vykuntaraju K, et al. "Cannabidiol in Drug-Resistant Epilepsy (DRE) in Children: A Retrospective Study.." Indian pediatrics, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13312-025-00075-9
RethinkTHC
RethinkTHC Research Database. "Cannabidiol in Drug-Resistant Epilepsy (DRE) in Children: A ..." RTHC-06573. Retrieved from https://rethinkthc.com/research/gowda-2025-cannabidiol-in-drugresistant-epilepsy
Access the Original Study
Study data sourced from PubMed, a service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.
This study breakdown was produced by the RethinkTHC research team. We analyze and report published research findings without making health recommendations. All interpretations are based solely on the published abstract and study data.