Cannabis Users May Need More Sedation for GI Procedures

Cannabis users often require higher and less predictable doses of propofol during endoscopy, and inhalation users face increased airway risks including bronchospasm.

Goudra, Basavana et al.·Journal of clinical medicine·2025·Moderate EvidenceReview
RTHC-06571ReviewModerate Evidence2025RETHINKTHC RESEARCH DATABASErethinkthc.com/research

Quick Facts

Study Type
Review
Evidence
Moderate Evidence
Sample
Not reported

What This Study Found

This narrative review found that cannabis users frequently need higher doses of propofol and other sedatives for GI endoscopy. Inhalation-based cannabis use is associated with airway hyperreactivity, increasing the risk of bronchospasm and laryngospasm. Cardiovascular effects including tachycardia and hypertension may also complicate sedation. Acute intoxication can impair the ability to provide informed consent.

Key Numbers

Review article; specific effect sizes vary across cited studies; key concerns: higher propofol requirements, airway hyperreactivity, cardiovascular effects (tachycardia, hypertension), impaired consent capacity with acute intoxication

How They Did This

Narrative review summarizing existing literature on the pharmacology of cannabis and its implications for sedation during GI endoscopy procedures.

Why This Research Matters

With cannabis use increasingly common, sedation providers for routine procedures like colonoscopies need to anticipate altered drug responses in cannabis users. The practical implications for dosing, airway management, and consent are directly relevant to clinical practice.

The Bigger Picture

As cannabis legalization expands, the proportion of patients presenting for procedures with recent cannabis exposure will continue to grow, making this a routine rather than exceptional clinical consideration.

What This Study Doesn't Tell Us

Narrative review without systematic methodology. Most evidence comes from case reports and small studies. Effects during routine screening procedures may differ from complex therapeutic endoscopy.

Questions This Raises

  • ?Should pre-procedure questionnaires specifically screen for cannabis use timing and route?
  • ?What propofol dose adjustments are appropriate for regular cannabis users?

Trust & Context

Key Stat:
Evidence Grade:
Moderate: narrative review synthesizing clinical evidence, but without systematic methodology or meta-analysis.
Study Age:
2025 review article
Original Title:
Perioperative Repercussions of Cannabis Use-Implications for GI Endoscopy Sedation.
Published In:
Journal of clinical medicine, 14(19) (2025)
Database ID:
RTHC-06571

Evidence Hierarchy

Meta-Analysis / Systematic Review
Randomized Controlled Trial
Cohort / Case-Control
Cross-Sectional / ObservationalSnapshot without intervening
This study
Case Report / Animal Study

Summarizes existing research on a topic.

What do these levels mean? →

Read More on RethinkTHC

Cite This Study

RTHC-06571·https://rethinkthc.com/research/RTHC-06571

APA

Goudra, Basavana; Green, Michael. (2025). Perioperative Repercussions of Cannabis Use-Implications for GI Endoscopy Sedation.. Journal of clinical medicine, 14(19). https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14197028

MLA

Goudra, Basavana, et al. "Perioperative Repercussions of Cannabis Use-Implications for GI Endoscopy Sedation.." Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14197028

RethinkTHC

RethinkTHC Research Database. "Perioperative Repercussions of Cannabis Use-Implications for..." RTHC-06571. Retrieved from https://rethinkthc.com/research/goudra-2025-perioperative-repercussions-of-cannabis

Access the Original Study

Study data sourced from PubMed, a service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

This study breakdown was produced by the RethinkTHC research team. We analyze and report published research findings without making health recommendations. All interpretations are based solely on the published abstract and study data.