Low-Dose THC-CBD Extract Showed Cognitive Benefit in 26-Week Alzheimer's Trial

In the longest clinical trial of cannabinoids in Alzheimer's patients to date, a very low dose THC-CBD extract led to significantly higher cognitive scores compared to placebo over 26 weeks.

Cury, Rafael de Morais et al.·Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD·2025·Moderate EvidenceRandomized Controlled Trial
RTHC-06280Randomized Controlled TrialModerate Evidence2025RETHINKTHC RESEARCH DATABASErethinkthc.com/research

Quick Facts

Study Type
Randomized Controlled Trial
Evidence
Moderate Evidence
Sample
Not reported

What This Study Found

Patients receiving low-dose THC-CBD extract (0.350 mg THC + 0.245 mg CBD daily) had significantly higher Mini-Mental State Exam scores at week 26 compared to placebo.

Key Numbers

Daily dose: 0.350 mg THC + 0.245 mg CBD. Duration: 26 weeks. Significant improvement in MMSE total score vs placebo.

How They Did This

Phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Participants aged 60-80 with Alzheimer's dementia received either placebo or THC-CBD extract orally for 26 weeks.

Why This Research Matters

Alzheimer's has very few effective treatments. A 26-week trial showing cognitive benefit with a remarkably low cannabinoid dose could open a new treatment avenue.

The Bigger Picture

This is the first long-duration RCT to show a cognitive signal with cannabinoids in Alzheimer's.

What This Study Doesn't Tell Us

Phase 2 trial, likely small sample. Only the primary outcome was significant. Requires replication.

Questions This Raises

  • ?What is the mechanism at such a low dose?
  • ?Can results be replicated in a larger Phase 3 trial?

Trust & Context

Key Stat:
26-week RCT: low-dose THC-CBD significantly improved cognitive scores vs placebo
Evidence Grade:
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase 2 trial; moderate because it needs replication.
Study Age:
2025 publication of a 26-week trial
Original Title:
A randomized clinical trial of low-dose cannabis extract in Alzheimer's disease.
Published In:
Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD, 108(4), 1602-1613 (2025)
Database ID:
RTHC-06280

Evidence Hierarchy

Meta-Analysis / Systematic Review
Randomized Controlled TrialGold standard for testing treatments
This study
Cohort / Case-Control
Cross-Sectional / Observational
Case Report / Animal Study

Participants are randomly assigned to treatment or placebo groups to test cause and effect.

What do these levels mean? →

Frequently Asked Questions

How low was the dose used?

Extremely low: 0.350 mg of THC and 0.245 mg of CBD per day. A typical recreational dose might contain 5-10 mg of THC.

Does this mean cannabis can treat Alzheimer's?

It is too early to say. This is a single Phase 2 trial. Larger and longer trials are necessary.

Read More on RethinkTHC

Cite This Study

RTHC-06280·https://rethinkthc.com/research/RTHC-06280

APA

Cury, Rafael de Morais; da Silva, Taynara; Cezar-Dos-Santos, Fernando; Fakih, Yasmin Rafaela Correia; Narvaez, Karlin Andrea Ramírez; Gouvea, Murilo Chaves; Espínola, Carlos; Ferreira, Charles Francisco; de Castro, Wagner Antonio Chiba; Pamplona, Fabrício Alano; Silva, Elton Gomes da; Bicca, Maíra Assunção; Nascimento, Francisney Pinto. (2025). A randomized clinical trial of low-dose cannabis extract in Alzheimer's disease.. Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD, 108(4), 1602-1613. https://doi.org/10.1177/13872877251389608

MLA

Cury, Rafael de Morais, et al. "A randomized clinical trial of low-dose cannabis extract in Alzheimer's disease.." Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1177/13872877251389608

RethinkTHC

RethinkTHC Research Database. "A randomized clinical trial of low-dose cannabis extract in ..." RTHC-06280. Retrieved from https://rethinkthc.com/research/cury-2025-a-randomized-clinical-trial

Access the Original Study

Study data sourced from PubMed, a service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

This study breakdown was produced by the RethinkTHC research team. We analyze and report published research findings without making health recommendations. All interpretations are based solely on the published abstract and study data.