Blocking CB1 receptors in the liver raised blood sugar by activating sympathetic nerves, a warning for obesity drug developers

A potent CB1 receptor blocker stimulated glucose production in the liver through sympathetic nerve signaling, revealing that strong CB1 inverse agonism could raise fasting blood sugar and should be avoided in weight-loss drugs.

Chen, Wei et al.·European journal of pharmacology·2017·Preliminary EvidenceAnimal StudyAnimal Study
RTHC-01357Animal StudyPreliminary Evidence2017RETHINKTHC RESEARCH DATABASErethinkthc.com/research

Quick Facts

Study Type
Animal Study
Evidence
Preliminary Evidence
Sample
Not reported

What This Study Found

MJ08, a CB1 receptor antagonist/inverse agonist more potent than rimonabant, was found to stimulate hepatic glucose production (HGP) in a dose-dependent manner in perfused rat livers. It also promoted expression of gluconeogenic genes.

The mechanism involved the liver's sympathetic nervous system. MJ08 triggered noradrenaline release from hepatic nerves and increased cAMP content in the liver. These effects were blocked by propranolol (a beta-blocker) and reserpine (which depletes noradrenaline), confirming the sympathetic pathway.

Importantly, when tested on isolated hepatocytes (liver cells without nerve connections), only slight increases were seen, confirming that the main effect requires intact nerve connections to the liver.

Key Numbers

MJ08 showed superior inverse agonism compared to rimonabant. Dose-dependent increase in hepatic glucose production. Effects blocked by propranolol (beta-blocker), reserpine (sympathetic inhibitor), NF449 and H89 (cAMP pathway inhibitors), and WIN 55,212-2 (CB1 agonist).

How They Did This

Perfused rat liver preparations to study glucose production. Primary cultured hepatocytes for comparison. Pharmacological blocking experiments using CB1 agonist, cAMP pathway inhibitors, beta-blocker, and sympathetic inhibitor to dissect the mechanism. Monoamine neurotransmitter and cAMP measurements.

Why This Research Matters

This finding has direct implications for the development of peripheral CB1 blockers for obesity. Strong inverse agonist activity at liver CB1 receptors can raise blood sugar through sympathetic nerve activation, potentially worsening metabolic disease rather than treating it. This means CB1 weight-loss drugs must be carefully designed to avoid high inverse agonistic activity.

The Bigger Picture

Not all CB1 blockers are equal. The distinction between antagonism (simply blocking the receptor) and inverse agonism (actively suppressing baseline receptor activity) has real metabolic consequences. This study shows that inverse agonism specifically activates hepatic sympathetic nerves, which could explain some of the metabolic side effects seen with rimonabant and guide development of safer compounds.

What This Study Doesn't Tell Us

Animal study using perfused liver preparations, which may not fully replicate intact organism physiology. Only acute effects were studied. The relevance of this mechanism to human liver physiology is assumed but not confirmed. MJ08 is a research tool compound, not a drug candidate.

Questions This Raises

  • ?Can CB1 antagonists be designed with minimal inverse agonism to avoid the glucose production problem?
  • ?Did rimonabant's metabolic effects in humans partly reflect this hepatic sympathetic mechanism?
  • ?Would peripheral CB1 blockers with neutral antagonism avoid blood sugar elevation?

Trust & Context

Key Stat:
Strong CB1 inverse agonism raised liver glucose production through sympathetic nerve activation
Evidence Grade:
Animal pharmacology study using perfused liver preparations. Provides important mechanistic insights for drug development but is far from clinical application.
Study Age:
Published in 2017. The distinction between CB1 antagonism and inverse agonism continues to guide metabolic drug design.
Original Title:
Cannabinoid CB1 receptor inverse agonist MJ08 stimulates glucose production via hepatic sympathetic innervation in rats.
Published In:
European journal of pharmacology, 814, 232-239 (2017)
Database ID:
RTHC-01357

Evidence Hierarchy

Meta-Analysis / Systematic Review
Randomized Controlled Trial
Cohort / Case-Control
Cross-Sectional / Observational
Case Report / Animal StudyOne case or non-human subjects
This study

Tests effects in animals (usually mice or rats), not humans.

What do these levels mean? →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the difference between an antagonist and an inverse agonist?

An antagonist blocks a receptor, preventing other molecules from activating it. An inverse agonist goes further, actively reducing the receptor's baseline activity below normal levels. This study shows the distinction matters: inverse agonism at liver CB1 receptors triggered glucose production that simple antagonism might not.

Could this affect people taking weight-loss drugs?

This finding warns drug developers that CB1-blocking weight-loss drugs with strong inverse agonist properties could raise blood sugar, potentially worsening diabetes risk in obese patients. Drugs with neutral antagonism (blocking without suppressing baseline activity) may be safer.

Read More on RethinkTHC

Cite This Study

RTHC-01357·https://rethinkthc.com/research/RTHC-01357

APA

Chen, Wei; Liu, Hongying; Guan, Hua; Xue, Nina; Wang, Lili. (2017). Cannabinoid CB1 receptor inverse agonist MJ08 stimulates glucose production via hepatic sympathetic innervation in rats.. European journal of pharmacology, 814, 232-239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejphar.2017.08.030

MLA

Chen, Wei, et al. "Cannabinoid CB1 receptor inverse agonist MJ08 stimulates glucose production via hepatic sympathetic innervation in rats.." European journal of pharmacology, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejphar.2017.08.030

RethinkTHC

RethinkTHC Research Database. "Cannabinoid CB1 receptor inverse agonist MJ08 stimulates glu..." RTHC-01357. Retrieved from https://rethinkthc.com/research/chen-2017-cannabinoid-cb1-receptor-inverse

Access the Original Study

Study data sourced from PubMed, a service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

This study breakdown was produced by the RethinkTHC research team. We analyze and report published research findings without making health recommendations. All interpretations are based solely on the published abstract and study data.