Only 18% of prescribed cannabinoid patients in Manitoba were still using them after one year

In a population-based study of 5,452 new cannabinoid prescription users in Manitoba, only 18% continued use at one year, with median duration of just 31 days and significant variation by diagnosis and medication type.

Alkabbani, Wajd et al.·Addiction (Abingdon·2019·Moderate EvidenceRetrospective Cohort
RTHC-01907Retrospective CohortModerate Evidence2019RETHINKTHC RESEARCH DATABASErethinkthc.com/research

Quick Facts

Study Type
Retrospective Cohort
Evidence
Moderate Evidence
Sample
Not reported

What This Study Found

Among 5,452 new prescribed cannabinoid users, 18.1% continued use at 1 year. Median duration was 31 days. Nabilone had the longest median use (33 days) and nabiximols the shortest (20 days). Fibromyalgia, osteoarthritis, and substance use disorder were associated with longer use, while cancer was associated with much shorter use.

Key Numbers

5,452 new users studied. 18.1% (95% CI 17.08-19.12) still using at 1 year. Median duration: 31 days (IQR 25-193). Nabilone median: 33 days. Nabiximols median: 20 days. Cancer patients had HR 2.73 for discontinuation (95% CI 2.02-3.67). Substance use disorder had HR 0.85 for discontinuation.

How They Did This

Retrospective population-based cohort study using administrative health data from the Manitoba Population Research Data Repository. Included all new cannabinoid prescription users from April 2004 to April 2016, followed for 1 year.

Why This Research Matters

Real-world persistence data reveals that most prescribed cannabinoid patients stop relatively quickly. The reasons differ by condition: cancer patients may stop due to disease progression or death, while chronic pain patients may persist longer because their conditions are ongoing.

The Bigger Picture

Prescription persistence is a proxy for real-world effectiveness and tolerability. The finding that most patients stop within a month suggests either the medications are not meeting expectations, side effects are problematic, or the conditions they are treating are self-limited.

What This Study Doesn't Tell Us

Administrative data cannot capture reasons for discontinuation (inefficacy, side effects, symptom resolution, or death). Cannabis obtained outside the medical system was not tracked. The study period predated Canadian recreational legalization.

Questions This Raises

  • ?Why do most patients stop so quickly?
  • ?Does the low persistence reflect poor efficacy, intolerable side effects, or access to non-prescription cannabis?
  • ?How has recreational legalization affected medical cannabis prescription patterns?

Trust & Context

Key Stat:
18% still using at 1 year
Evidence Grade:
Rated moderate because this is a large population-based cohort study with over 5,000 subjects and 12 years of data, though it lacks information on reasons for discontinuation.
Study Age:
Published in 2019, covering prescriptions from 2004-2016. Canadian recreational cannabis was legalized in 2018, which may have changed prescribing patterns.
Original Title:
Persistence of use of prescribed cannabinoid medicines in Manitoba, Canada: a population-based cohort study.
Published In:
Addiction (Abingdon, England), 114(10), 1791-1799 (2019)
Database ID:
RTHC-01907

Evidence Hierarchy

Meta-Analysis / Systematic Review
Randomized Controlled Trial
Cohort / Case-ControlFollows or compares groups over time
This study
Cross-Sectional / Observational
Case Report / Animal Study

Looks back at existing records to find patterns.

What do these levels mean? →

Frequently Asked Questions

How long do people typically use prescribed cannabinoids?

In this study, the median was only 31 days. Only about 1 in 5 patients were still using them after a year.

Which conditions led to longer use?

Fibromyalgia, osteoarthritis, and substance use disorder were associated with longer persistence. Cancer patients tended to stop much sooner (2.7 times more likely to discontinue).

Does this mean cannabinoid medications do not work?

Not necessarily. The study could not determine why patients stopped. Possible reasons include side effects, symptom resolution, switching to non-prescription cannabis, or disease progression.

Read More on RethinkTHC

Cite This Study

RTHC-01907·https://rethinkthc.com/research/RTHC-01907

APA

Alkabbani, Wajd; Marrie, Ruth Ann; Bugden, Shawn; Alessi-Severini, Silvia; Bolton, James M; Daeninck, Paul; Leong, Christine. (2019). Persistence of use of prescribed cannabinoid medicines in Manitoba, Canada: a population-based cohort study.. Addiction (Abingdon, England), 114(10), 1791-1799. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.14719

MLA

Alkabbani, Wajd, et al. "Persistence of use of prescribed cannabinoid medicines in Manitoba, Canada: a population-based cohort study.." Addiction (Abingdon, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.14719

RethinkTHC

RethinkTHC Research Database. "Persistence of use of prescribed cannabinoid medicines in Ma..." RTHC-01907. Retrieved from https://rethinkthc.com/research/alkabbani-2019-persistence-of-use-of

Access the Original Study

Study data sourced from PubMed, a service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

This study breakdown was produced by the RethinkTHC research team. We analyze and report published research findings without making health recommendations. All interpretations are based solely on the published abstract and study data.