CBD for Tooth Extraction Pain: A Tiny Pilot Trial Shows It's Feasible to Study

In a pilot trial with just 8 patients, oral CBD after tooth extraction was feasible and well-tolerated — but with only 2 patients per group, the study was designed to test the method, not whether CBD actually works for dental pain.

Abidi, Ammaar H et al.·Pharmaceuticals (Basel·2025·Preliminary EvidencePilot Study·1 min read
RTHC-05859Pilot StudyPreliminary Evidence2025RETHINKTHC RESEARCH DATABASErethinkthc.com/research

Quick Facts

Study Type
Pilot Study
Evidence
Preliminary Evidence
Sample
N=8
Participants
N=8 adults, all participants underwent dental extractions.

What This Study Found

Dental extractions are one of the most common surgeries worldwide, and post-operative pain management typically relies on ibuprofen, acetaminophen, or opioids. Could CBD offer a non-opioid alternative? This pilot trial was designed to find out whether that question is even testable — not to answer it.

Eight adults undergoing simple tooth extraction were randomized to four groups of 2 patients each: low-dose CBD (17 mg/mL), high-dose CBD (37 mg/mL), placebo, or standard treatment (ibuprofen/acetaminophen). CBD and placebo groups received 0.5 mL doses every 4-6 hours as needed for 7 days. Pain was tracked using a 0-10 scale via ecological momentary assessment over 72 hours.

With only 2 patients per group, no meaningful efficacy comparisons are possible — this was never the point. The study established that the trial protocol works: patients were successfully randomized, dosed, and assessed using phone-based pain tracking. CBD was well-tolerated with no serious adverse events.

The value of this study is entirely methodological. It lays the groundwork for a properly powered randomized controlled trial that could determine whether CBD has a role in dental pain management. For a field desperate for non-opioid pain alternatives, establishing that the clinical trial infrastructure works is a necessary first step.

Key Numbers

8 patients total. 4 groups of 2. CBD doses: 17 mg/mL and 37 mg/mL, 0.5 mL per dose. Pain tracked over 72 hours via ecological momentary assessment. No serious adverse events reported. Study was powered for feasibility, not efficacy.

How They Did This

Randomized pilot trial (SWAP trial). 8 adults undergoing simple tooth extraction randomized equally to 4 arms (n=2 per arm): CBD 17 mg/mL, CBD 37 mg/mL, placebo, or treatment-as-usual (ibuprofen/acetaminophen). CBD/placebo: 0.5 mL every 4-6 hours as needed for 7 days. Primary endpoint: pain intensity (0-10 NRS) via ecological momentary assessment over 72 hours. Secondary: worst pain, rescue medication use.

Why This Research Matters

The opioid crisis has created urgent demand for non-opioid pain management options, and dental procedures are one of the most common entry points for opioid prescriptions. If CBD could provide meaningful dental pain relief, the impact would be enormous. But first someone has to prove the trial design works — that's what this pilot did.

The Bigger Picture

This is the dental-specific entry in the broader CBD-for-pain cluster. RTHC-00099 (chronic pain patient experiences) showed patients finding medical cannabis helpful for pain, and RTHC-00098 (CBD and innate immunity) provided the mechanistic basis for anti-inflammatory effects. This pilot takes the first step toward controlled clinical evidence in a specific, common pain scenario. The ecological momentary assessment method connects to RTHC-00089 (standard THC units), which used the same real-time tracking approach for a different purpose.

What This Study Doesn't Tell Us

The study was designed for feasibility, not efficacy — 8 patients across 4 groups provides zero statistical power for comparing treatments. Simple extractions may not represent the full range of dental pain (surgical extractions, impacted teeth). The 72-hour assessment window captures only acute pain, not the full recovery period. CBD dosing was not based on established pharmacokinetic data for dental pain specifically. No blood levels measured to confirm CBD absorption.

Questions This Raises

  • ?Will the full-scale RCT show CBD is effective for dental pain?
  • ?What CBD dose would be needed to match ibuprofen/acetaminophen efficacy?
  • ?Could CBD reduce the need for opioid prescriptions after dental surgery?
  • ?Would topical CBD application directly to the extraction site work differently than oral dosing?

Trust & Context

Key Stat:
Evidence Grade:
Pilot feasibility trial with 2 patients per arm. No efficacy conclusions can be drawn. The study's value is entirely in establishing methodology for a future adequately powered trial.
Study Age:
Published in 2025. A larger follow-up trial may be in development based on this pilot.
Original Title:
Oral Cannabidiol for Acute Post-Extraction Pain: A Randomized Pilot Study.
Published In:
Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland), 18(12) (2025)Pharmaceuticals is a peer-reviewed journal focusing on drug development and therapeutic applications.
Database ID:
RTHC-05859

Evidence Hierarchy

Meta-Analysis / Systematic Review
Randomized Controlled Trial
Cohort / Case-Control
Cross-Sectional / ObservationalSnapshot without intervening
This study
Case Report / Animal Study

A small preliminary study to test whether a larger study is feasible.

What do these levels mean? →

Read More on RethinkTHC

Cite This Study

RTHC-05859·https://rethinkthc.com/research/RTHC-05859

APA

Abidi, Ammaar H; Kassan, Modar; Derefinko, Karen. (2025). Oral Cannabidiol for Acute Post-Extraction Pain: A Randomized Pilot Study.. Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland), 18(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/ph18121792

MLA

Abidi, Ammaar H, et al. "Oral Cannabidiol for Acute Post-Extraction Pain: A Randomized Pilot Study.." Pharmaceuticals (Basel, 2025. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph18121792

RethinkTHC

RethinkTHC Research Database. "Oral Cannabidiol for Acute Post-Extraction Pain: A Randomize..." RTHC-05859. Retrieved from https://rethinkthc.com/research/abidi-2025-oral-cannabidiol-for-acute

Access the Original Study

Study data sourced from PubMed, a service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

This study breakdown was produced by the RethinkTHC research team. We analyze and report published research findings without making health recommendations. All interpretations are based solely on the published abstract and study data.