The largest cannabis-MS trial found no improvement on the Ashworth spasticity scale, but patients reported significant improvements in spasticity and pain, and objective mobility measures improved.
Read this if you have MS and want to know about the largest clinical trial of cannabis for spasticity.
667 patients: Ashworth scale negative (p=0.40) but patient-reported spasticity improved (p=0.003)
What the researchers found
In this landmark trial of 667 MS patients across 33 UK centers, neither oral cannabis extract nor THC improved spasticity as measured by the Ashworth scale (primary outcome, p=0.40). However, patient-reported spasticity improvement was significantly better with both active treatments compared to placebo (p=0.003): 61% on cannabis extract, 60% on THC, and 46% on placebo reported improvement.
Objective mobility measures also improved in the treatment groups. The trial raised important questions about whether the Ashworth scale, a clinician-rated measure, adequately captured the spasticity improvements that patients experienced.
Why it matters
The CAMS study was the largest randomized trial of cannabis for MS at the time and remains one of the most important. The disconnect between negative objective spasticity results and positive patient-reported outcomes sparked a major debate about outcome measurement in spasticity research and whether clinician-rated scales adequately capture patient experience.
The numbers in context
667 patients enrolled, 630 treated, 611 followed for primary endpoint. Cannabis extract: n=211, THC: n=206, placebo: n=213. Primary outcome p=0.40 (not significant). Patient-reported improvement: 61% cannabis extract, 60% THC, 46% placebo (p=0.003). Trial duration: 15 weeks at 33 UK centers.
How the study worked
This was a randomized, placebo-controlled trial enrolling 667 patients with stable MS and muscle spasticity at 33 UK centers. Patients received oral cannabis extract (n=211), THC (n=206), or placebo (n=213) for 15 weeks. The primary outcome was change in Ashworth scale spasticity scores. Analysis was by intention to treat. Patient-reported outcomes and objective mobility measures were secondary endpoints.
What this study cannot tell us
The primary outcome was negative, and the study technically failed to demonstrate efficacy. Some unmasking occurred (patients could tell they were on active treatment), potentially biasing patient-reported outcomes. The 15-week duration may have been insufficient for full therapeutic effect. Oral dosing required dose titration that some patients may not have optimized.
How to read the evidence
This is a large, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled trial with 667 patients, providing strong evidence despite the mixed results.
When this study was published
Published in 2003. This landmark trial influenced subsequent research and the eventual approval of Sativex for MS spasticity.
The bigger picture
Despite the negative primary outcome, the CAMS study contributed to the eventual approval of Sativex for MS spasticity, partly because it demonstrated meaningful patient-reported benefits. The study also led to a follow-up trial (MUSEC) that used patient-reported outcomes as the primary measure and found positive results. The Ashworth scale has been increasingly questioned as a spasticity measure since this trial.
Questions still open
- Does the Ashworth scale adequately measure spasticity as experienced by patients? Should patient-reported outcomes be primary endpoints in spasticity trials? Did the follow-up MUSEC trial resolve the ambiguity?
Common questions
Did cannabis help with MS spasticity in this trial?
Why do patients and doctors disagree about whether spasticity improved?
Read the original research
Cannabinoids for treatment of spasticity and other symptoms related to multiple sclerosis (CAMS study): multicentre randomised placebo-controlled trial.
Lancet (London, England), 362(9395), 1517-26
Citation
Zajicek, John; Fox, Patrick; Sanders, Hilary; Wright, David; Vickery, Jane; Nunn, Andrew; Thompson, Alan. (2003). Cannabinoids for treatment of spasticity and other symptoms related to multiple sclerosis (CAMS study): multicentre randomised placebo-controlled trial.. Lancet (London, England), 362(9395), 1517-26.
Explore the wider topic
- CBD Oil Quality Guide: How to Avoid Snake Oil
- Anxiety After Quitting Weed: When to Consider Medication
- Cannabis for Chemotherapy Nausea: What the Evidence Actually Shows
- Cannabis for Chronic Pain: What the Research Actually Supports
- Cannabis and Epilepsy: The Epidiolex Story and What It Means
- Does CBD Actually Work for Anxiety? What the Evidence Shows
- Does CBD Help with Weed Withdrawal? What Studies Show
- CBD vs THC: The Differences That Actually Matter
- The Proven Medical Benefits of Cannabis: What Research Supports
- Quitting Weed Before Surgery
- Weed and Medications: What Changes When You Quit
- Quitting Weed During Pregnancy: What You Need to Know
- Quitting Weed While Pregnant: What You Need to Know
- Cannabis and Older Adults: Risks Seniors Should Know
- Cannabis and Breastfeeding: THC in Breast Milk
- THC Patches, Suppositories, and Topicals: Non-Inhalation Methods Explained
- Cannabis and Endometriosis: Why Women Are Turning to THC for Pain
- Cannabis and Menstrual Cramps: Does THC Actually Help Period Pain