Louisiana Medical Marijuana Patients Report Less Pain and Fewer Prescription Painkillers
Among 2,000+ Louisiana medical marijuana patients, pain levels dropped by an average of 3.4 points, and those who stopped prescription painkillers used more medical marijuana.
Quick Facts
What This Study Found
Respondents reported lower pain levels with medical marijuana use by an average of 3.4 points on a 10-point scale. Patients using prescription painkillers were 1.5 times more likely to use medical marijuana less frequently. Those who stopped prescription painkillers had 26.5% higher odds of using more medical marijuana, suggesting substitution.
Key Numbers
Over 2,000 respondents. Pain reduced by 3.4 points on 10-point scale (Z=-35.77, p<0.001). Prescription pain users 1.5x more likely to use MM less frequently (OR=1.524, 95% CI: 1.114-2.074, p<0.01). Stopping prescriptions increased odds of more MM use by 26.5% (OR=0.735, 95% CI: 0.586-0.923, p<0.001).
How They Did This
Survey of more than 2,000 Louisiana medical marijuana program participants examining frequency and amount of use, with analysis of relationships between race, age, reason for use, prescription use, and program duration.
Why This Research Matters
With the U.S. opioid crisis ongoing, evidence that medical marijuana may serve as a substitute for prescription painkillers supports the case for expanded access in states still debating legalization.
The Bigger Picture
A growing body of evidence from patient surveys across multiple states consistently shows medical marijuana patients report reduced pain and decreased use of prescription opioids. The Louisiana data adds to this pattern.
What This Study Doesn't Tell Us
Self-reported pain reduction without objective measures. Survey participants are self-selected medical marijuana users, introducing bias toward positive outcomes. No control group. Cross-sectional design cannot establish causation.
Questions This Raises
- ?Would a randomized trial confirm pain reduction of this magnitude with medical marijuana?
- ?Which forms of medical marijuana (flower, oil, edibles) are most effective for pain substitution?
Trust & Context
- Key Stat:
- Medical marijuana patients reported pain reduction averaging 3.4 points on a 10-point scale
- Evidence Grade:
- Large survey with significant statistical findings, but self-report design without controls limits strength of evidence.
- Study Age:
- 2025 publication.
- Original Title:
- Medical Marijuana and Opioid Usage: An Analysis of Patient Perceptions in Louisiana.
- Published In:
- Substance use & misuse, 1-6 (2025)
- Database ID:
- RTHC-06695
Evidence Hierarchy
Read More on RethinkTHC
- CBD-oil-quality-guide
- anxiety-medication-after-quitting-weed
- cannabis-chemotherapy-nausea
- cannabis-chronic-pain-research
- cannabis-epilepsy-CBD-Epidiolex
- cbd-anxiety-research-evidence
- cbd-for-weed-withdrawal
- cbd-vs-thc-difference
- medical-benefits-of-cannabis
- quitting-weed-before-surgery
- quitting-weed-medication-interactions
- quitting-weed-pregnancy
- quitting-weed-pregnant
- seniors-older-adults-cannabis-risks-medications
- weed-breastfeeding-THC-breast-milk
Cite This Study
https://rethinkthc.com/research/RTHC-06695APA
Hummel, Daniel; Sutherlin, John W; Hawkins, Ashley; Thomas, Kathryn; Corbett, Kym. (2025). Medical Marijuana and Opioid Usage: An Analysis of Patient Perceptions in Louisiana.. Substance use & misuse, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1080/10826084.2025.2584703
MLA
Hummel, Daniel, et al. "Medical Marijuana and Opioid Usage: An Analysis of Patient Perceptions in Louisiana.." Substance use & misuse, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1080/10826084.2025.2584703
RethinkTHC
RethinkTHC Research Database. "Medical Marijuana and Opioid Usage: An Analysis of Patient P..." RTHC-06695. Retrieved from https://rethinkthc.com/research/hummel-2025-medical-marijuana-and-opioid
Access the Original Study
Study data sourced from PubMed, a service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.
This study breakdown was produced by the RethinkTHC research team. We analyze and report published research findings without making health recommendations. All interpretations are based solely on the published abstract and study data.