rethinkTHC Search
Menu
Study breakdown

Survey of 1,087 chronic pain patients finds those using both inhaled and oral cannabis report the most benefit

Cross SectionalModerate evidence
The takeaway

Among 1,087 chronic pain patients using cannabis, those who combined inhalation and non-inhalation routes reported greater health improvements and more medication substitutions than those using either route alone.

Chronic pain patients using or considering cannabis, clinicians guiding cannabis use, and researchers designing clinical trials.

45% of pain patients use both inhaled and oral cannabis

What the researchers found

Of participants, 45% used both inhalation and non-inhalation routes, 36.2% used inhalation only, and 18.8% used non-inhalation only. The combined group reported significantly greater health improvements and more medication class substitutions than either single-route group. THC-rich products were typically used at night while CBD-rich products were used during the day. All groups reported similar pain reduction.

Why it matters

This is one of the largest studies to characterize how chronic pain patients actually use cannabis in practice, revealing sophisticated self-directed routines involving multiple products, routes, and timing strategies.

The numbers in context

1,087 participants; 45% used combined routes, 36.2% inhalation only, 18.8% non-inhalation only. Combined route users had 0.62 more medication substitutions than non-inhalation users and 0.45 more than inhalation users.

How the study worked

Mixed methods analysis of 1,087 cross-sectional survey responses from adults with chronic pain using cannabis in the US and Canada. Qualitative analysis of open-ended responses about use routines, followed by quantitative comparison of subgroups based on administration routes.

What this study cannot tell us

Cross-sectional self-report data. No verification of diagnoses, products, or outcomes. Selection bias toward cannabis-positive respondents. No control group. Medication substitution self-reported, not verified.

How to read the evidence

Large survey capturing naturalistic use patterns, but self-report and cross-sectional design limit causal claims.

When this study was published

Published in 2022.

The bigger picture

The finding that patients naturally develop multi-route, time-of-day-specific cannabis regimens suggests clinical trials using a single product may not capture how cannabis is most effectively used for pain management.

Questions still open

  • Would prescribing multi-route regimens outperform single-route in clinical trials? Is the nighttime THC / daytime CBD pattern optimal? Do patients using multiple routes have higher tolerance or dependence risk?

Common questions

How do chronic pain patients typically use cannabis?
Most patients (45%) combined inhalation (smoking or vaping) with non-inhalation methods (edibles, tinctures, topicals). A common pattern was THC-rich products at night for sleep and CBD-rich products during the day.
Did using multiple cannabis routes produce better outcomes?
Yes. Patients using both inhaled and oral routes reported greater overall health improvements and substituted more medication classes (like opioids or benzodiazepines) compared to those using only one route.

Read the original research

A mixed methods analysis of cannabis use routines for chronic pain management.

Journal of cannabis research, 4(1), 7

Citation

Boehnke, Kevin F; Yakas, Laura; Scott, J Ryan; DeJonckheere, Melissa; Litinas, Evangelos; Sisley, Suzanne; Clauw, Daniel J; Williams, David A; McAfee, Jenna. (2022). A mixed methods analysis of cannabis use routines for chronic pain management.. Journal of cannabis research, 4(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42238-021-00116-7

Explore the wider topic