National Survey Identifies Five Distinct Patterns of Drug Abuse, With Cannabis-Only Being the Most Common
Analysis of 43,093 Americans identified five drug abuse patterns: no abuse (92.5%), cannabis-only (5.8%), stimulants/hallucinogens (0.6%), prescription drugs (0.6%), and polysubstance (0.5%), each with distinct psychiatric profiles.
Quick Facts
What This Study Found
Using latent class analysis of the National Epidemiological Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (43,093 participants), researchers identified five distinct patterns of illicit drug abuse/dependence.
The largest class (92.5%) had no drug abuse/dependence. Cannabis abuse/dependence only was the most common drug problem (5.8%). Three smaller classes were identified: stimulants/hallucinogens (0.6%), prescription drugs including sedatives, tranquilizers, and opiates (0.6%), and polysubstance abuse/dependence (0.5%).
Each class had a distinct psychiatric profile. The polysubstance class had the strongest associations with major depression and nicotine dependence. The prescription drug class had the strongest association with anxiety disorders. All drug classes (2-5) were associated with alcohol abuse/dependence and antisocial personality disorder compared to the no-abuse class.
Key Numbers
43,093 participants. Class 1: no abuse/dependence (92.5%). Class 2: cannabis only (5.8%). Class 3: stimulants/hallucinogens (0.6%). Class 4: prescription drugs (0.6%). Class 5: polysubstance (0.5%). Polysubstance: strongest link to depression. Prescription drugs: strongest link to anxiety.
How They Did This
Latent class analysis of 43,093 participants from the National Epidemiological Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. Multinomial logistic regression examined associations between drug abuse classes and psychiatric disorders (DSM-IV diagnoses of depression, anxiety, panic, social phobia, antisocial personality).
Why This Research Matters
Identifying distinct patterns of drug abuse rather than treating all illicit drug use as one category allows for better-targeted prevention and treatment. The finding that cannabis-only abuse is by far the most common pattern (5.8% vs. 0.5-0.6% for other patterns) and has the mildest psychiatric profile informs risk stratification.
The Bigger Picture
This study helped move the field away from treating "drug abuse" as a monolithic category. By showing that different drug abuse patterns have different psychiatric profiles, it supported the development of more targeted assessment and treatment approaches.
What This Study Doesn't Tell Us
Cross-sectional design cannot determine whether drug abuse preceded or followed psychiatric disorders. Self-reported drug use in a national survey may underestimate prevalence. The latent class solution depends on the analytic approach and sample characteristics.
Questions This Raises
- ?Do these five classes have different treatment needs and outcomes?
- ?Is the cannabis-only class at risk of progressing to polysubstance use?
Trust & Context
- Key Stat:
- Cannabis-only abuse (5.8%) was the most common drug problem pattern, 10x more prevalent than polysubstance (0.5%)
- Evidence Grade:
- Large nationally representative sample (43,093) with standardized diagnostic assessments. Strong methodology for descriptive epidemiology.
- Study Age:
- Published in 2007. Subsequent analyses have replicated these general patterns, though legalization may be changing the landscape.
- Original Title:
- A latent class analysis of illicit drug abuse/dependence: results from the National Epidemiological Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions.
- Published In:
- Addiction (Abingdon, England), 102(1), 94-104 (2007)
- Authors:
- Agrawal, Arpana(39), Lynskey, Michael T(26), Madden, Pamela A F(15), Bucholz, Kathleen K, Heath, Andrew C
- Database ID:
- RTHC-00258
Evidence Hierarchy
A snapshot of a population at one point in time.
What do these levels mean? →Frequently Asked Questions
How common is cannabis-only abuse compared to other drug problems?
Cannabis-only abuse/dependence (5.8% of the population) was by far the most common illicit drug problem, about 10 times more prevalent than stimulant/hallucinogen, prescription drug, or polysubstance abuse patterns (each about 0.5-0.6%).
Do people who only use cannabis have mental health problems?
The cannabis-only class was described as "milder" compared to other drug abuse patterns. It was associated with alcohol abuse and antisocial personality disorder but had weaker associations with depression and anxiety compared to the prescription drug and polysubstance classes.
Read More on RethinkTHC
- cannabis-dependence-physical-psychological-addiction-science
- cannabis-perception-vs-evidence-gap
- cannabis-use-disorder-test
- cross-addiction-quit-weed-start-drinking
- is-weed-addictive
- is-weed-addictive-science
- quitting-weed-and-alcohol
- rehab-for-weed-addiction-necessary
- signs-of-cannabis-use-disorder
- weed-vape-pen-addiction
- why-does-weed-make-you-paranoid-amygdala
- why-weed-makes-me-anxious-now-not-before
- thc-and-ssris-cannabis-antidepressants
- thc-and-benzodiazepines-dangerous-overlap
- cannabis-and-socializing-only-use-around-others
Cite This Study
https://rethinkthc.com/research/RTHC-00258APA
Agrawal, Arpana; Lynskey, Michael T; Madden, Pamela A F; Bucholz, Kathleen K; Heath, Andrew C. (2007). A latent class analysis of illicit drug abuse/dependence: results from the National Epidemiological Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions.. Addiction (Abingdon, England), 102(1), 94-104.
MLA
Agrawal, Arpana, et al. "A latent class analysis of illicit drug abuse/dependence: results from the National Epidemiological Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions.." Addiction (Abingdon, 2007.
RethinkTHC
RethinkTHC Research Database. "A latent class analysis of illicit drug abuse/dependence: re..." RTHC-00258. Retrieved from https://rethinkthc.com/research/agrawal-2007-a-latent-class-analysis
Access the Original Study
Study data sourced from PubMed, a service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.
This study breakdown was produced by the RethinkTHC research team. We analyze and report published research findings without making health recommendations. All interpretations are based solely on the published abstract and study data.