'Willingness to Take Again' Better Predicted Cannabis Abuse Potential Than 'Drug Liking'

In a retrospective analysis of 89 daily cannabis users across four studies, subjective ratings of 'Willingness to Take Again' were a better predictor of actual cannabis self-administration than the FDA-recommended 'Drug Liking' measure.

Shellenberg, Thomas P et al.·The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics·2025·Moderate Evidenceclinical-trial
RTHC-07636Clinical TrialModerate Evidence2025RETHINKTHC RESEARCH DATABASErethinkthc.com/research

Quick Facts

Study Type
clinical-trial
Evidence
Moderate Evidence
Sample
Not reported

What This Study Found

Higher ratings of Willingness to Take Again (OR=1.04) were significantly associated with increased odds of self-administering active THC cannabis over a monetary alternative. Higher Stimulated ratings were associated with decreased odds of choosing placebo cannabis (OR=0.94). Drug Liking was not the most predictive measure, contrary to FDA recommendations.

Key Numbers

89 daily users (71 male, 18 female). 4 studies, 2 sites. THC: 5.5-5.9%. Willingness to Take Again: OR 1.04 (significant). Stimulated (for placebo): OR 0.94 (significant). Drug Liking: not the top predictor. Money alternatives: $0.50 or $1.00.

How They Did This

Retrospective analysis combining data from 4 previous studies across 2 research sites. 89 daily cannabis users (71 male, 18 female) completed cannabis self-administration sessions with a money alternative ($0.50 or $1.00) and subjective effects questionnaires. THC concentrations were 5.5-5.9%. Generalized linear models tested which subjective ratings predicted self-administration.

Why This Research Matters

The FDA uses Drug Liking as the primary measure in abuse potential assessments for new drugs. If this measure is not the best predictor of actual drug-taking behavior for cannabinoids, regulatory evaluations of novel cannabinoid products may need updating.

The Bigger Picture

As the cannabinoid product market expands with novel compounds (delta-8, THCA, HHC), regulators need accurate tools to assess abuse potential. This study suggests the current FDA-recommended approach may miss the mark for cannabinoids, potentially leading to inaccurate risk assessments.

What This Study Doesn't Tell Us

Retrospective analysis of combined datasets with methodological differences between studies. Small sample with predominantly male participants. Daily cannabis users may not represent occasional users. Low monetary alternatives ($0.50-$1.00) may limit ecological validity. THC concentrations were similar across studies but administration procedures varied.

Questions This Raises

  • ?Whether Willingness to Take Again is a better predictor for non-cannabis drug abuse potential as well
  • ?How these findings should change FDA guidance for evaluating novel cannabinoid products

Trust & Context

Key Stat:
Evidence Grade:
Retrospective pooled analysis with behavioral outcome validation, but combined datasets and predominantly male sample limit generalizability.
Study Age:
Published 2025.
Original Title:
Subjective drug-effect ratings predict cannabis self-administration in people who use cannabis daily.
Published In:
The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics, 392(7), 103622 (2025)
Database ID:
RTHC-07636

Evidence Hierarchy

Meta-Analysis / Systematic Review
Randomized Controlled Trial
Cohort / Case-Control
Cross-Sectional / ObservationalSnapshot without intervening
This study
Case Report / Animal Study
What do these levels mean? →

Frequently Asked Questions

Why does it matter how abuse potential is measured?

When new cannabinoid products seek FDA approval or regulatory classification, their abuse potential determines scheduling and marketing restrictions. If the primary measurement tool (Drug Liking) is not the best predictor of actual drug-taking, products may be incorrectly classified as more or less risky than they actually are.

What is the difference between Drug Liking and Willingness to Take Again?

Drug Liking captures the immediate pleasurable experience. Willingness to Take Again captures the overall assessment including both positive effects and negative effects. Someone might like a drug's effect but still not want to take it again due to side effects, making it a more comprehensive predictor.

Read More on RethinkTHC

Cite This Study

RTHC-07636·https://rethinkthc.com/research/RTHC-07636

APA

Shellenberg, Thomas P; Strickland, Justin C; Regnier, Sean D; Tolbert, Preston T; Lake, Stephanie; Wesley, Michael J; Stoops, William W; Cooper, Ziva D; Haney, Margaret; Lile, Joshua A. (2025). Subjective drug-effect ratings predict cannabis self-administration in people who use cannabis daily.. The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics, 392(7), 103622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpet.2025.103622

MLA

Shellenberg, Thomas P, et al. "Subjective drug-effect ratings predict cannabis self-administration in people who use cannabis daily.." The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpet.2025.103622

RethinkTHC

RethinkTHC Research Database. "Subjective drug-effect ratings predict cannabis self-adminis..." RTHC-07636. Retrieved from https://rethinkthc.com/research/shellenberg-2025-subjective-drugeffect-ratings-predict

Access the Original Study

Study data sourced from PubMed, a service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

This study breakdown was produced by the RethinkTHC research team. We analyze and report published research findings without making health recommendations. All interpretations are based solely on the published abstract and study data.