rethinkTHC Search
Menu
Study breakdown

When Drug Quality Drops, Users Switch to Alcohol and Other Substances

Cross SectionalPreliminary evidence
The takeaway

In a simulated drug market, cannabis demand was sensitive to quality changes, with users switching to alcohol when cannabis quality decreased, while alcohol demand was unaffected by quality.

Read this if you're interested in how drug policy and market changes affect substance use patterns.

Cannabis demand was quality elastic; users switched to alcohol when quality dropped

What the researchers found

Eighty polydrug users completed a simulated purchasing task where drug prices stayed fixed but perceived quality changed for alcohol, amphetamine, cannabis, cocaine, and ecstasy.

Alcohol demand was "quality inelastic," meaning users kept buying the same amount regardless of quality, and alcohol quality changes didn't affect purchases of other drugs.

Cannabis demand was "quality elastic," meaning purchases dropped as quality decreased, and alcohol substituted for cannabis as its effective unit price rose. Similarly, cocaine demand was quality elastic, with alcohol, cannabis, and ecstasy substituting for it. Ecstasy showed the same pattern, with alcohol and cocaine as substitutes.

The key finding was that drug markets behave like economic markets: when one product becomes less appealing, consumers switch to substitutes rather than simply using less.

Why it matters

Understanding how drug users respond to quality changes has direct implications for drug policy. If cannabis quality decreases (through regulation, contamination, or enforcement), users may shift to alcohol or other substances rather than reducing total substance use.

The numbers in context

80 polydrug users. Alcohol: quality inelastic. Cannabis: quality elastic, alcohol substitutes. Cocaine: quality elastic, alcohol/cannabis/ecstasy substitute. Ecstasy: quality elastic, alcohol/cocaine substitute.

How the study worked

Cross-sectional behavioral economics study. 80 polydrug users completed questionnaires (DAST-A, SDS, AUDIT, HADS) and a simulated drug purchasing task where price remained fixed but quality varied, effectively changing the unit price.

What this study cannot tell us

Simulated purchasing tasks may not reflect real-world behavior. The sample of 80 polydrug users may not represent all drug-using populations. The study examined stated preferences rather than actual purchases.

How to read the evidence

This is a simulated market study with a modest sample size. While the economic framework is sound, stated preferences in simulations may not predict real behavior.

When this study was published

Published in 2008. Behavioral economics of drug use has become a more established research field since then.

The bigger picture

This study applied economic theory to drug markets, demonstrating that substance use decisions follow rational economic patterns. This has implications for drug policy: enforcement that reduces cannabis quality may inadvertently increase alcohol use or use of other drugs.

Questions still open

  • Do real-world drug quality fluctuations produce the substitution patterns predicted by this simulation? Could regulated cannabis markets with quality standards reduce substitution toward more harmful substances?

Common questions

What does "quality elastic" mean?
It means demand changes in response to quality. If cannabis quality drops, users buy less cannabis. "Quality inelastic" (like alcohol in this study) means users keep buying the same amount regardless of quality.
Why does this matter for drug policy?
If cracking down on cannabis quality causes users to switch to alcohol or other drugs, the policy may not reduce overall harm. Understanding substitution patterns helps design policies that actually reduce total substance-related harm.

Read the original research

The effects of perceived quality on the behavioural economics of alcohol, amphetamine, cannabis, cocaine, and ecstasy purchases.

Drug and alcohol dependence, 94(1-3), 183-90

Citation

Cole, Jon C; Goudie, Andrew J; Field, Matt; Loverseed, Anne-Claire; Charlton, Sarah; Sumnall, Harry R. (2008). The effects of perceived quality on the behavioural economics of alcohol, amphetamine, cannabis, cocaine, and ecstasy purchases.. Drug and alcohol dependence, 94(1-3), 183-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2007.11.014

Explore the wider topic