Oil and Concentrate Users Had the Most Problematic Cannabis Use Patterns

Among 4,031 US young adults, those who moderately used oils and concentrates had the highest rates of problematic use, worst mental health, and were nearly 4 times more likely to drive after combined cannabis-alcohol use.

Berg, Carla J et al.·Substance abuse treatment·2025·Moderate EvidenceCross-Sectional
RTHC-06050Cross SectionalModerate Evidence2025RETHINKTHC RESEARCH DATABASErethinkthc.com/research

Quick Facts

Study Type
Cross-Sectional
Evidence
Moderate Evidence
Sample
Not reported

What This Study Found

Four cannabis use classes emerged: infrequent-herb/edibles (41.4%), moderate-herb (28.0%), frequent-herb (16.8%), and moderate-oil/other (13.8%). The moderate-oil/other group reported the most problematic use, worst mental health, lowest quitting confidence, and highest odds of driving after cannabis-alcohol co-use (AOR=3.98). Paradoxically, frequent-herb users reported less problematic use than moderate-herb users.

Key Numbers

4,031 young adults, 48.8% past-month use. Moderate-oil/other (13.8%): highest problematic use (B=0.39), lowest quitting confidence (B=-1.27), most mental health symptoms (B=1.03), driving after co-use AOR=3.98. Frequent-herb reported less problematic use than moderate-herb (B=-0.18).

How They Did This

Latent class analysis of 2023 survey data from 4,031 US young adults (mean age 26.3, 48.8% past-month use). Indicators included days used, frequency per day, and type usually used. Regressions examined class associations with problematic use, quitting factors, and mental health.

Why This Research Matters

Not all cannabis use is the same. The type of product matters as much as frequency, with oil and concentrate users showing a distinct risk profile that warrants targeted prevention messaging.

The Bigger Picture

The cannabis product landscape has diversified far beyond flower. Oils, concentrates, and other high-potency products appear to carry distinct risk profiles. Prevention efforts focused only on frequency may miss users whose product choice puts them at higher risk.

What This Study Doesn't Tell Us

Cross-sectional design. Self-reported measures. Cannot determine whether product type drives risk or whether risk-prone individuals select certain products. Young adult sample may not generalize.

Questions This Raises

  • ?What about oils and concentrates drives problematic use?
  • ?Is it potency, ease of use, or user characteristics?
  • ?Would product-specific education reduce these risks?

Trust & Context

Key Stat:
4x higher odds of driving after cannabis-alcohol co-use for oil/concentrate users
Evidence Grade:
Moderate: large sample with sophisticated latent class analysis, but cross-sectional design and self-reported outcomes
Study Age:
Published in 2025 using 2023 survey data
Original Title:
Cannabis use characteristics and associations with problematic use outcomes, quitting-related factors, and mental health among US young adults.
Published In:
Substance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy, 20(1), 1 (2025)
Database ID:
RTHC-06050

Evidence Hierarchy

Meta-Analysis / Systematic Review
Randomized Controlled Trial
Cohort / Case-Control
Cross-Sectional / ObservationalSnapshot without intervening
This study
Case Report / Animal Study

A snapshot of a population at one point in time.

What do these levels mean? →

Frequently Asked Questions

Are oils and concentrates more risky than flower?

In this study, moderate users of oils and concentrates had higher rates of problematic use, worse mental health, and were nearly 4 times more likely to drive after combined cannabis-alcohol use compared to moderate flower users. Product type appears to matter for risk.

Why did frequent flower users report less problematic use?

Paradoxically, frequent-herb users reported less problematic use than moderate-herb users. This may reflect that daily flower users have developed tolerance and stable use patterns, while moderate users may be in a more variable and potentially escalating phase.

Read More on RethinkTHC

Cite This Study

RTHC-06050·https://rethinkthc.com/research/RTHC-06050

APA

Berg, Carla J; LoParco, Cassidy R; Romm, Katelyn F; Cui, Yuxian; McCready, Darcey M; Wang, Yan; Yang, Y Tony; Szlyk, Hannah S; Kasson, Erin; Chakraborty, Rishika; Cavazos-Rehg, Patricia A. (2025). Cannabis use characteristics and associations with problematic use outcomes, quitting-related factors, and mental health among US young adults.. Substance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy, 20(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13011-025-00634-0

MLA

Berg, Carla J, et al. "Cannabis use characteristics and associations with problematic use outcomes, quitting-related factors, and mental health among US young adults.." Substance abuse treatment, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13011-025-00634-0

RethinkTHC

RethinkTHC Research Database. "Cannabis use characteristics and associations with problemat..." RTHC-06050. Retrieved from https://rethinkthc.com/research/berg-2025-cannabis-use-characteristics-and

Access the Original Study

Study data sourced from PubMed, a service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

This study breakdown was produced by the RethinkTHC research team. We analyze and report published research findings without making health recommendations. All interpretations are based solely on the published abstract and study data.