Adults Who Screened Positive for ADHD Did Not Report More Driving Incidents
In a representative sample of 4,014 Ontario adults, those screening positive for ADHD symptoms reported higher substance use but no more driving after drinking, driving after cannabis use, or collision involvement.
Quick Facts
What This Study Found
Of 3,485 licensed drivers surveyed, 3.22% screened positive for ADHD symptoms. Those screening positive were younger, reported more distress, antisocial behavior, anti-anxiety and antidepressant medication use, substance use, and social problems compared to those screening negative.
However, there were no statistically significant differences between ADHD-positive and ADHD-negative groups on any driving outcome: driving after 2+ drinks, driving within an hour of cannabis use, street racing, or collision involvement in the past year.
When a regression model controlled for age, sex, and kilometers driven, ADHD screening status was not associated with collision risk. Cannabis use ever approached but did not reach statistical significance as a collision predictor.
Key Numbers
4,014 adults sampled, 3,485 licensed drivers. 3.22% screened positive for ADHD. No significant differences in driving after drinking, driving after cannabis, street racing, or collisions. Cannabis use approached significance for collision risk.
How They Did This
Data came from the CAMH Ontario Monitor, a repeated cross-sectional telephone survey. 4,014 Ontario adults were sampled over 2 years. ADHD was assessed using the Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale (ASRS-V1.1). Multiple psychiatric, substance use, and driving measures were collected.
Why This Research Matters
This is the first population-based study in Ontario to examine ADHD screening and driving outcomes in a representative adult sample. The null finding for driving risks is reassuring but should be interpreted cautiously given the limitations of self-report screening versus clinical diagnosis.
The Bigger Picture
ADHD has been associated with increased driving risk in clinical samples, but this population-based study did not confirm that association. The difference may reflect selection bias in clinical studies or the use of a screening tool rather than clinical diagnosis in this study.
What This Study Doesn't Tell Us
ADHD was assessed by self-report screener, not clinical diagnosis. The ADHD-positive sample was small (3.22% of 4,014). Self-reported driving outcomes may underestimate risky behaviors. The telephone survey format excludes people without landlines. These results should be interpreted as preliminary.
Questions This Raises
- ?Would clinically diagnosed ADHD show a different relationship with driving outcomes?
- ?Does ADHD medication use modify driving risk?
- ?Would a larger ADHD sample reveal differences that were underpowered here?
Trust & Context
- Key Stat:
- No difference in driving incidents between ADHD-positive and ADHD-negative adults
- Evidence Grade:
- This is a population-based cross-sectional study, but the ADHD measure was a screening tool rather than clinical diagnosis, limiting its sensitivity.
- Study Age:
- Published in 2014. Research on ADHD and driving safety continues with more sophisticated methods.
- Original Title:
- Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, other mental health problems, substance use, and driving: examination of a population-based, representative canadian sample.
- Published In:
- Traffic injury prevention, 15 Suppl 1, S1-9 (2014)
- Authors:
- Vingilis, Evelyn(3), Mann, Robert E(11), Erickson, Patricia, Toplak, Maggie, Kolla, Nathan J, Seeley, Jane, Jain, Umesh
- Database ID:
- RTHC-00889
Evidence Hierarchy
A snapshot of a population at one point in time.
What do these levels mean? →Frequently Asked Questions
Why does this contradict other ADHD driving studies?
Many ADHD driving studies use clinical samples (people seeking treatment), which may overrepresent severe cases. This population-based study captures the full spectrum of ADHD symptoms, including milder presentations that may not affect driving.
Does this mean ADHD has no effect on driving?
Not necessarily. The screening tool may miss some ADHD cases, and the self-reported driving outcomes may not capture all incidents. The result is reassuring but should be replicated with clinical diagnoses and objective driving data.
Read More on RethinkTHC
Cite This Study
https://rethinkthc.com/research/RTHC-00889APA
Vingilis, Evelyn; Mann, Robert E; Erickson, Patricia; Toplak, Maggie; Kolla, Nathan J; Seeley, Jane; Jain, Umesh. (2014). Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, other mental health problems, substance use, and driving: examination of a population-based, representative canadian sample.. Traffic injury prevention, 15 Suppl 1, S1-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2014.926341
MLA
Vingilis, Evelyn, et al. "Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, other mental health problems, substance use, and driving: examination of a population-based, representative canadian sample.." Traffic injury prevention, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2014.926341
RethinkTHC
RethinkTHC Research Database. "Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, other mental healt..." RTHC-00889. Retrieved from https://rethinkthc.com/research/vingilis-2014-attention-deficit-hyperactivity-disorder
Access the Original Study
Study data sourced from PubMed, a service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.
This study breakdown was produced by the RethinkTHC research team. We analyze and report published research findings without making health recommendations. All interpretations are based solely on the published abstract and study data.