Daily Cannabis Use Doubled While Cannabis Use Disorder Rates Dropped Nearly 50% From 2002-2019
Between 2002 and 2019, daily cannabis use prevalence increased 94% while CUD prevalence among daily users dropped 48%, suggesting changing cultural norms are redefining what counts as "disordered" use.
Quick Facts
What This Study Found
Daily cannabis use prevalence increased 94% (AARC 11.68%). CUD among daily users decreased 47.9% (AARC -10.30%). Individual CUD criteria prevalence decreased 13.4-59.6% among daily users. In contrast, daily alcohol use decreased 10.86% while AUD among daily drinkers decreased only 3.9%. Treatment engagement and perceived need both decreased for cannabis.
Key Numbers
Daily cannabis use: +94% (AARC 11.68%). CUD among daily users: -47.9% (AARC -10.30%). Daily alcohol use: -10.86% (AARC -1.90%). AUD among daily drinkers: -3.9% (AARC -0.67%). Individual CUD criteria changes: -13.4% to -59.6%. Treatment engagement decreased for cannabis, increased for alcohol.
How They Did This
Analysis of National Survey on Drug Use and Health data from 2002 to 2019. Computed temporal trends and average annual rates of change for CUD and AUD symptoms, treatment engagement, and perceived treatment need. Compared divergent trajectories of cannabis and alcohol use disorders.
Why This Research Matters
The paradox of more daily use but less diagnosed disorder suggests that how people define "problematic" cannabis use is shifting with cultural acceptance. This has profound implications for diagnostic frameworks: if the same behavior is disorder in one cultural context but not another, the diagnostic criteria themselves may need examination.
The Bigger Picture
This study raises fundamental questions about how substance use disorders are diagnosed. Many CUD criteria reference "harm" (e.g., continued use despite problems, failure to fulfill obligations). If legalization and normalization reduce the social and legal harms of use, fewer people meet these criteria even while using more cannabis.
What This Study Doesn't Tell Us
NSDUH data are cross-sectional and self-reported, with possible changes in reporting honesty over time as cannabis became more accepted. Diagnostic criteria did not change between 2002 and 2019 (transition from DSM-IV to DSM-5 in 2013 may have affected comparability). The study ends in 2019 before the pandemic.
Questions This Raises
- ?Should CUD diagnostic criteria be revised to account for changing social contexts?
- ?Are declining CUD rates a positive sign of reduced harm or a concerning sign of declining treatment engagement?
Trust & Context
- Key Stat:
- Daily cannabis use +94% while CUD among daily users -48% (2002-2019)
- Evidence Grade:
- Strong: large national dataset spanning nearly two decades with systematic trend analysis comparing cannabis and alcohol as reference substances.
- Study Age:
- 2025 study using 2002-2019 NSDUH data.
- Original Title:
- Divergence in cannabis and alcohol use disorder prevalence trends from 2002 to 2019.
- Published In:
- Drug and alcohol dependence, 266, 112521 (2025)
- Authors:
- Acuff, Samuel F(3), Strickland, Justin C(9)
- Database ID:
- RTHC-05864
Evidence Hierarchy
A snapshot of a population at one point in time.
What do these levels mean? →Frequently Asked Questions
How can more people use cannabis daily but fewer have a use disorder?
Many CUD criteria reference harm and impairment. As cannabis becomes legal and normalized, the social, legal, and occupational consequences of use decrease. With fewer consequences, fewer daily users meet diagnostic thresholds for disorder, even though pharmacological use patterns may be similar.
Is the same thing happening with alcohol?
No. AUD among daily drinkers decreased only 3.9% compared to 47.9% for CUD among daily cannabis users. The cultural context around alcohol has been relatively stable, while cannabis norms have shifted dramatically, supporting the interpretation that cultural context shapes disorder prevalence.
Read More on RethinkTHC
- cannabis-dependence-physical-psychological-addiction-science
- cannabis-perception-vs-evidence-gap
- cannabis-use-disorder-test
- cross-addiction-quit-weed-start-drinking
- is-weed-addictive
- is-weed-addictive-science
- quitting-weed-and-alcohol
- rehab-for-weed-addiction-necessary
- signs-of-cannabis-use-disorder
- weed-vape-pen-addiction
Cite This Study
https://rethinkthc.com/research/RTHC-05864APA
Acuff, Samuel F; Strickland, Justin C. (2025). Divergence in cannabis and alcohol use disorder prevalence trends from 2002 to 2019.. Drug and alcohol dependence, 266, 112521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2024.112521
MLA
Acuff, Samuel F, et al. "Divergence in cannabis and alcohol use disorder prevalence trends from 2002 to 2019.." Drug and alcohol dependence, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2024.112521
RethinkTHC
RethinkTHC Research Database. "Divergence in cannabis and alcohol use disorder prevalence t..." RTHC-05864. Retrieved from https://rethinkthc.com/research/acuff-2025-divergence-in-cannabis-and
Access the Original Study
Study data sourced from PubMed, a service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.
This study breakdown was produced by the RethinkTHC research team. We analyze and report published research findings without making health recommendations. All interpretations are based solely on the published abstract and study data.