rethinkTHC Search
Menu
Study breakdown

Scoping review summarizes what lab-based cannabis self-administration studies reveal about use patterns

Systematic ReviewLow evidence
The takeaway

A scoping review of human laboratory cannabis self-administration studies found these paradigms useful for understanding consumption factors but noted methodological inconsistencies that limit comparability across studies.

Addiction researchers, clinical pharmacologists, and scientists developing cannabis use disorder treatments.

Lab self-administration studies reveal tolerance, sex, and potency effects on cannabis consumption

What the researchers found

Ad libitum cannabis self-administration studies in laboratory settings have identified factors influencing consumption and subjective response, including tolerance, sex differences, and cannabis potency. These paradigms could also test potential CUD medications.

Why it matters

Understanding why people use cannabis and how much they consume under controlled conditions helps develop treatments for cannabis use disorder and inform harm reduction strategies.

The numbers in context

Multiple laboratory self-administration studies reviewed. Factors identified: tolerance effects, sex differences, potency influences on consumption patterns.

How the study worked

Scoping review summarizing existing human laboratory studies where participants could self-administer cannabis ad libitum. Examined what factors have been studied and what has been learned.

What this study cannot tell us

Laboratory settings do not replicate real-world use contexts. Ethical constraints limit who can participate and what doses can be studied. Methodological inconsistencies across studies limit meta-analytic synthesis. Small study samples typical.

How to read the evidence

Scoping review mapping a specialized research area. Identifies themes but does not quantitatively synthesize findings.

When this study was published

Published 2023.

The bigger picture

Laboratory self-administration paradigms have been valuable for studying alcohol and other drugs. Applying these methods to cannabis could accelerate medication development for CUD, a condition with no approved pharmacotherapy.

Questions still open

  • Could standardized laboratory self-administration protocols become a platform for screening CUD medications? Would these paradigms capture the effects of modern high-potency cannabis products?

Common questions

How do researchers study cannabis use in a lab?
In self-administration studies, participants are allowed to use cannabis freely in a controlled laboratory setting while researchers measure how much they consume, how it affects them, and what factors influence their use patterns. These studies help identify what drives cannabis consumption.
Are there medications for cannabis addiction?
Currently, there are no FDA-approved medications for cannabis use disorder. This review suggests that laboratory self-administration studies could be used to screen potential medications, similar to how such paradigms have helped develop treatments for alcohol and opioid use disorders.

Read the original research

Cannabis self-administration in the human laboratory: a scoping review of ad libitum studies.

Psychopharmacology, 240(7), 1393-1415

Citation

Xiao, Ke Bin; Grennell, Erin; Ngoy, Anthony; George, Tony P; Le Foll, Bernard; Hendershot, Christian S; Sloan, Matthew E. (2023). Cannabis self-administration in the human laboratory: a scoping review of ad libitum studies.. Psychopharmacology, 240(7), 1393-1415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-023-06360-4

Explore the wider topic